• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Study: Pollution Dramatically Lowering Solar Power Output In China

by Bob Yirka
July 09, 2019, 4:13 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
4

China Air PollutionAn international team of researchers has found that air pollution in China is dramatically reducing the amount of power that is generated by solar cells in that country.

In their paper published in the journal Nature Energy, the group describes studying data from solar observational stations over the past several decades and what they found.

China currently leads the world in solar energy production—the country produced 170 gigawatts of power at the end of last year. And the country has plans to add a lot more.

But according to the new study, China is not realizing the full potential of its solar installations due to air pollution—particles in the air block some of the solar radiation.

To find out how much of an impact air pollution has on solar production in China, the researchers obtained data from 119 solar measuring stations across the country going all the way back to 1960.

They also collected data on black carbon and sulfur dioxide emissions for the same period as a way to make sure that any reductions in solar radiation they found came from air pollution rather than climate change.

The researchers were able to work out how much less solar radiation was reaching the ground over the years 1960 to 2015. They then compared solar radiation levels with solar energy installations and production.

Doing so allowed them to see just how much less power was being produced due to air pollution.

They report that in 2016, China produced 14 terawatt-hours less than it could have if pollution levels were the same as in 1960.

They further report that because China is planning to triple its solar energy production by 2030, the country could be losing out on 74 TWh a year, if pollution levels hold steady.

They note also that at 2016 rates, the country lost out on $1.9 billion worth of electricity that year—and that could rise to $6.7 billion by 2030.

The researchers also found that measures taken by the government in recent years to reduce air pollution have had a small impact on diminishing solar radiation—they describe it as a “minor reversal” for the years 2010 to 2015.

Read more at Phys.org

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 4

  1. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    Yet Canada’s Prime Minister idolizes China worlds biggest polluter .
    Why is it Canada has 6 immigration offices in a communist country like China
    and most other countries have maybe 1 or 2 ?
    Trudeau has allowed for the invasion of Canada without a shot being fired .
    Can’t wait for election day . The Liberals and their preachy PC agenda are
    going to be gone .

    Reply
    • Del says:
      7 years ago

      Much of this pollution comes from coal. This coal could be replaced by natural gas but of course the Liberals and the rest of the far left radical terrorists hate pipelines and want to shut down Canadian resource production. The seemingly alcoholic Green leader, E. May, claims natural gas would contribute to pollution. Excess alcohol consumption is proven to damage brain cells.

      Reply
  2. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    Green job creation, people wiping soot off solar panels.
    President Trump derides China for stealing our jobs through unfair trading practises. Why not state the obvious? They’re a Communist dictatorship and they’re stinking up the place.

    Reply
    • Rhee says:
      7 years ago

      It’s not just wiping off the panels, they’ve got to wash out the smog & soot that’s permanently suspended in the airspace dimming the sunlight.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • cattle livestockClimate Activists Demand Costly Cattle Methane Rules. Ranchers Pay The Price
    Jul 28, 2026
    Climate activists demand costly cattle methane rules from a safe distance, while ranchers absorb the real cost of compliance. […]
  • air conditioning unitYes, Air Conditioning Saves Lives — And No, It’s Not Causing Climate Doom
    Jul 28, 2026
    Popular Mechanics says A/C could doom us all. It won't — air conditioning saves lives, and its climate impact is negligible at best. […]
  • Nighttime view of a wildfire blazing through forests in Puerto de la Cruz, Spain.Europe’s Wildfires Expose Decades Of Bad Forestry, Dry Fuel Loads
    Jul 28, 2026
    Bad forestry policies and dry fuel loads—not climate change—are fueling Europe's wildfires, especially near urban centers. […]
  • hawaii tropical cycloneThe El Niño Paradox — Calmer Atlantic Hurricane Season, Wilder Pacific Cyclones
    Jul 27, 2026
    El Niño means fewer Atlantic hurricanes, but tropical cyclone activity rises worldwide, with U.S. damage costs telling a different story. […]
  • german defunct car factoryEurope’s ‘Green’ Energy Transition Is A Delusion, Global Data Shows
    Jul 27, 2026
    An Energy Institute report shows Europe's energy transition is a costly climate illusion — while fossil fuels power record global growth elsewhere. […]
  • cartoon climate asylumOne Year After The ICJ’s Climate Ruling, The Cult Just Won’t Quit
    Jul 27, 2026
    One year after the UN's ICJ climate ruling, climate alarmism refuses to fade — despite mounting data undercutting the doomsday narrative. […]
  • NAS weather witchesHow Do You Get Science 180 Degrees Backwards? Ask the National Academy Of Sciences
    Jul 24, 2026
    The National Academies got causation backwards in a court manual, and now its extreme weather report goes all in on attribution pseudoscience. […]
  • cars vehicles roadwaySenate GOP Unveils First-of-Its-Kind Bill To Kill Costly Fuel Economy Standards
    Jul 24, 2026
    Supporters say the measure would lower vehicle costs by ending decades-old CAFE rules they argue have functioned as a de facto EV mandate. […]
  • Ships have switched to low-sulfur diesel, which has reduced aerosol emissions that block the sun.Scientists Now Blame Reduced Aerosol Emissions For Rising Temperatures
    Jul 24, 2026
    A new study blames Europe's heat waves and rising temperatures on reduced aerosol emissions — the unintended fallout of decades of cleaner air. […]
  • ambulance seattleDespite Doubts, Judge Allows Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Big Oil To Proceed
    Jul 23, 2026
    Rockefeller-funded groups push a new legal theory as a wrongful death lawsuit against Big Oil survives dismissal — but the judge remains skeptical. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky