• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

New Poll Shows 53% of Likely Voters Oppose Dems’ $3.5T Spending Bill

by Joseph Vazquez
September 30, 2021, 10:59 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

stelterAmerican voters are not buying any of the propaganda the liberal media has been pushing in trying to sell the $3.5 trillion spending monstrosity put forward by the Democratic Party.

A new poll of 1,000 likely voters by Rasmussen Reports released Sept. 27 found that “Fifty-three percent (53%) are opposed to the passage of the $3.5 trillion [reconciliation] spending measure, including 41% who Strongly Oppose passage.”

As Rasmussen described it, “[m]ost voters are against the $3.5 trillion ‘reconciliation’ budget bill now pending in Congress.”

The report also noted that the majority of voters are “also opposed to raising the national debt ceiling.” The results of the poll slam against the media’s sugar-coating, virtue-signaling, and advocacy for the spending measure’s passage.

CNN Chief Media Correspondent Brian Stelter actually tried to gaslight viewers on the gargantuan price tag of the bill.

Stelter bleated during a Sept. 26 Reliable Sources segment that “there are labels like $3.5 trillion, huge numbers thrown around. They can be incredibly misleading.”

The segment got worse.

Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell actually attempted to claim that the $3.5 trillion figure was “a weird shorthand used but the bill itself will not cost $3.5 trillion in the sense it will be entirely paid for. So the actual cost will be smaller than that, perhaps zero.” Uh, what?

Staying true to form, CNN even attacked Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) for being against the massive spending bill.

CNN anchor Dana Bash tried to smear Manchin for daring to exercise a bit of austerity during an interview on the Sept. 12 segment of CNN’s State of the Union: “There are a number of your fellow Democrats who say that you’re opposed to this because you’re bought and paid for by corporate donors.”

In July, NBC News Business Correspondent Stephanie Ruhle praised the socialist bill as a “Barbie DreamHouse of improvements to the human condition.”

But based on analysis by CATO Director for Tax Policy Studies Chris Edwards, the bill is more like a left-wing crazy house of measures that would cripple the U.S. economy. It doesn’t look like voters are buying Ruhle’s pro-spending cheerleading.

Luckily, based on Rassmussen’s polling, it appears voters are rejecting the media narrative. Perhaps CNN, NBC, and others should start paying attention.

Read more at NewsBusters

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 3

  1. David Lewis says:
    5 years ago

    What 53% of the voters believe has much less meaning than once had. What really counts is what do the people who are likely to commit voter fraud believe.

    Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    Tax and spend tax and spend tax and spend is what the Democrats have become notorious for over the years and Biden the Worst will make it worst

    Reply
  3. Steve Bunten says:
    5 years ago

    The left-wing media will start to pay attention to actual voters the day after never. As to their attacking Manchin (also the attacks on him by the far-left on twitter), the more likely outcome will be that he digs his heals in more.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • boston summer sunUrban Heat Islands — Not Climate Change — Are Driving Up City Temperatures
    Jul 15, 2026
    Governing magazine blames climate change for extreme heat, but the real culprit is urban development driving the urban heat island effect. […]
  • tranmission lines reactorUnder Trump’s EO, Four Companies Have Jumpstarted America’s Nuclear Race
    Jul 15, 2026
    Four reactor companies hit criticality within 30 days, meeting Trump's July 4th deadline under DOE's nuclear pilot program. […]
  • A nuclear power plant in Europe operates cooling towers amid an overcast sky, part of the aging Soviet-designed reactor fleet still powering the continent's electricity grid.Europe’s Russian Reactor Problem Is A Growing NATO Problem
    Jul 15, 2026
    NATO's alliance runs on more than defense budgets — its aging Russian-designed reactors reveal a hidden threat to Western energy security. […]
  • neighborhood some homes for saleHow Wall Street’s Climate Alarmist Scorecard Is Quietly Torching Home Values
    Jul 14, 2026
    A private, unregulated climate score is contradicting FEMA flood maps — and quietly wrecking home values across the U.S. […]
  • mliband interviewEd Miliband Wants to Run the Treasury. Britain Should Be Terrified
    Jul 14, 2026
    Ed Miliband wants to be Chancellor. Given his North Sea flip-flopping and eco-zealot record, that should terrify Britain, not reassure it. […]
  • cartoon usgcrp summitTrump Taps Credentialed Scientist to Lead Federal Climate Program, Lefty Media Cringes
    Jul 14, 2026
    Dr. Matthew Wielicki’s appointment signals a course correction toward true scientific rigor and away from narrative-driven climate alarmism. […]
  • supreme court buildingAdvocates Call For Justice Kagan Investigation On Climate Change Bias
    Jul 13, 2026
    Advocates urged the Senate to investigate Justice Kagan’s potential conflict of interest in a major climate change case, and called for her recusal. […]
  • A tidal wave of legal defeats is swamping climate lawfare.After Eight Years, Maryland’s Climate Lawsuits Die A Quiet Death
    Jul 13, 2026
    Maryland's Supreme Court dealt the climate litigation campaign a clear defeat, rejecting three lawsuits as SCOTUS eyes a similar case. […]
  • cartoon battery storage costsRenewable Advocates’ Battery Bet Proves Cost Prohibitive: Report
    Jul 13, 2026
    A new report finds a wind-solar-battery grid would cost ratepayers $4 trillion over 20 years — far more than emissions benefits justify. […]
  • Washington Monument and National Mall on a blistering hot summer day in July.Climate Change Wasn’t Behind July Fourth’s Extreme Heat — Attribution Science Was
    Jul 13, 2026
    USA Today claims climate change caused deadly July heat waves and floods, but the data tells a very different story. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky