Among its top search results today for “climate change,” Google News is highlighting an article titled, “Massive Wildfires Will Keep Getting Worse – Even in ‘Best Case’ Climate Scenarios.”
For something to “keep” getting worse, however, it must be getting worse in the first place.
In reality, objective measurements of wildfires by NASA satellites show wildfires are burning less land than in decades past.
The Google-highlighted article is published by a leftist website called Truthout. The website self-identifies as “dedicated to providing independent reporting and commentary on a diverse range of social justice issues.”
That did not stop Google News from placing Truthout’s article at the very top of its search results for the scientific topic of climate change.
According to the article, “Massive wildfires have shattered records across the world in recent years.” To seemingly support its assertion, the article provides an embedded link in the words “shattered records.”
The link, however, is to a propaganda article published by the climate activist group Carbon Brief. That is not science.
So, what do objective scientific data report?
As we documented in a recent article here on Climate Realism, wildfires globally are in long-term decline. NASA satellites have measured a 25-percent decrease in global lands burned since 2003. That is an objective scientific fact.
Also, U.S. acres burned each year are much fewer now – even in our worst years – than was the case in the early 20th century. This is also a scientific fact.
Also, as documented in Climate at a Glance: Drought, drought in the United States is far less frequent and severe than in decades past. In two of the past three years, new records were set for the least amount of U.S. land experiencing drought.
Also, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports we are currently enjoying the longest period in recorded history without more than 40 percent of the country experiencing “Very Dry” conditions.
Truthout and Google News are either ignorant of the “facts” they are reporting, or they believe the ends of motivating climate action justify the means of being dishonest in their reporting.
Either way, the objective truth is wildfires are not currently getting worse, so they cannot “keep” getting worse.
Read more at Climate Realism
More & bigger wildfires? I think not. Just more of the “97% collusion” of alarmists … https://newtube.app/user/RAOB/drbkiaw
Bushfires become larger and more frequent when environmentalism rules over proper conservation in the management of public land. Another cause is arson.
In Australia, green journalists – a tautology if there ever was one – don’t take kindly to debates about the role of arson in bushfire policy any more than they do to debates about fuel reduction.
Arson causing bushfires is a difficult subject to pin down. However, there is likely an increased probability of bushfire arson when green journalists repeatedly talk up fire panic in the summer months, which is effectively all of the time.
From the title of the alarmist article, “Even in ‘Best Case’ Climate Scenarios.” They didn’t even get this right. The best case scenario is INMCM5, which predicts warming of 1.4 degrees by 2100. This is hardly enough to cause massive wildfires.
By the way, INMCM5 matches real world data more closely than another other model. However, its prediction of 1.4 degrees of warming makes it useless to justify drastic changes for climate change so that model is ignored.