For the last 100 years, we have seen climate prediction labels go from global warming, global cooling, global warming, climate change, climate catastrophe, climate emergency, and climate collapse.
The goal has been to scare the public and especially the children to give up their freedom and money to the powerful government.
Instead of journalists investigating and saying how wrong previous predictions have been, they go along with the indoctrination to try to force the radical leftist agenda and policies on the public.
These people all pretend they care about the poor and middle class, but the proposed policies would destroy tens of millions of jobs, would make income and wealth inequality much worse, and would make many millions more people dependent on government.
Everyone should stop pretending that Biden, Mayor Pete, Bloomberg or any other Democrat is moderate. They are all willing to destroy the economy and give much greater power to the government on climate and fossil fuels.
Here is a small sample of predictions on the climate that almost all of the media regurgitate with no questions asked:
- 2019-The UN says we only have a few years left because of warming.
- 2008-On ABC, Good Morning America. By 2015, New York City would be underwater, milk would be $13 per gallon and gasoline would be $9 per gallon, very little of Miami would be left. (they were so close)
- 2005-After Katrina we were told hurricanes would be more frequent and severe than ever. Instead, we had a ten-year lull in serious hurricanes hitting the U.S.
- 1989- The UN says we only have a few years left because of warming.
- 1970-First Earth Day. Billions would die soon because of global cooling and an ice age.
- 1922-AP and Washington Post-Coastal cities would soon be underwater because the ice caps have melted due to global warming.
Here is a small sample of questions for politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, educators, Time person’s of the year, and people who pretend to be journalists peddling the indoctrination and pushing the agenda.
- Why should we believe current predictions when previous predictions have been 100% wrong?
- What caused the floods that created oceans, lakes, and rivers over billions of years?
- What caused all the ice ages to start and stop throughout history?
- What caused the Sahara Desert to go from a lush savannah to a desert around 9,000 years ago (and have a 9,000-year drought so far)?
- How did so much of California become a desert?
- Why was Greenland warmer 1,000 years ago than today?
- How did we go from predicting disastrous warming in the 1920s to predicting disastrous global cooling in 1970 if rising CO2, fossil fuel use, humans and industrialization cause warming?
It is truly a shame that the media is willing to repeat talking points to push a radical, leftist agenda instead of doing their job of investigating and asking questions and telling the public the truth.
Why should we believe that if we give bureaucrats and politicians trillions of dollars and more control of our lives that the can control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever when these are the same people that peddled the lies about Russian collusion and Obamacare for years?
The greatest existential threat to our freedom and prosperity is the people pushing for getting rid of fossil fuels.
It is certainly not Trump, who is trying to give the power, purse, and freedom back to the people as fast as possible. It is he who is working to allow the poor and middle class to move up, not Democrats.
Read more at American Thinker
A few more questions:
Is temperature a sufficient indicator of climate?
Does a global mean temperature have any significance?
What is the true extent of global temperature readings over the last 150 years?
How is a temperature proxy calibrated?
Why have plants evolved to grow best with CO2 concentrations of 1000 ppm or more?
There is absolutely no way to calculate a global mean temperature based on the poorly distributed, daily minimum and daily maximum temperature readings. Local temperatures are very dynamic during a 24 hr period even when you do get data. Claiming “hottest year on record by 100ths of a degree when your data set yields a SWAG at best is just CRIMINAL. SWAG = Scientific Wild Ass Guess
Why do lotteries require your picture and name if you win?
To keep the scam alive. Proof that losers only need to be right, once.
That’s what The Weather Wreckage Channel is doing every time a tornado, wildfire or hurricane strikes, they’re making it seem local. You could be next.
When you run the numbers, climate science is bad science, just like a lottery.
All those rediculous predictions and not one of them has ever happened or ever will happen this Fragile Earth,Delicate Balance of Nature are the biggist scams ever I can still remember all that load of malarkey about a earth so polluted we would need to wear gas masks to go outside and all our cities be kept under giant domes and still they preach this nonsense to us