After decades of alarm calls over the impact of human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) on global temperatures and climate change, a glaring lack of factually demonstrated and scientifically proven evidence remains.
The evidence presented has been based on computer modeling of temperatures from global weather stations, a larger percentage of which are sited in towns and cities and no data, numerous studies show.
For the 70% of oceans, seas, and lakes, satellite measurements are routinely adjusted to take account of anomalies and sea level rise alarm, expressed in measurements of millimeters per century, does not quantify in that tidal gauges are subjected to landmass upheavals and/or subsidence, none of which can be taken to represent empirical evidence. See Also: New study shows coastlines gaining land despite sea level alarmism)
The very concept of a global temperature has been called into question by numerous studies and considering that there are no data for the 70% of oceans, seas, and lakes, the concept that a global temperature can be derived from a few thousand weather stations is rather dubious.
Observing the ever-changing high and low-pressure patterns – specifically in this case with regard to the UK – it becomes clear that most of the measured temperatures on land are the direct result of the direction from whence the wind has come.
Huge hot air masses are routinely blown from the Sahara; cold air masses from Siberia; temperate air from the Atlantic.
Nitrogen and oxygen could also be seen as greenhouse gases since they retain heat to some degree before cooling, whereas water vapor and carbon dioxide are actually cooling gases as they are the only gases that can emit the infrared radiation to the void of space.
Sending that same radiation back to the surface of the earth can not make the Earth any warmer than it was in the first place – c/f the Laws of Thermodynamics.
There is no evidence of ongoing and catastrophic melting of ice at the Arctic, Antarctic, or Greenland icecaps – the only evidence indicates a cyclical nature of melting and freezing.
The list of climate-related alarm calls is endless, so suffice to ask for evidence that can stand the scrutiny of scientific investigation, not the incidental, subjective and emotionally charged evidence that is presented on an almost daily basis by those who seek to control our lives by demonizing the emissions of CO2from human sources.
The UN IPCC* scientists set human emissions contribution of CO2 at 4% of total atmospheric CO2 of which only 16 parts per million of CO2 is man-made.
See figure 1:
There remains a need to establish what forces were at play predating mankind’s presence when atmospheric CO2 levels were higher and temperatures 2-3 degrees warmer than today and how and why that climate was created.
*https://tech-know-group.com/archives/IPCC_deception.pdf
Hans Schreuder trained as an analytical chemist in The Hague and spent 15 years working in that field, testing pharmaceutical products as well as researching the recycling of plastics and rubber. For another 15 years, he gained extensive experience as an international technical contractor, including writing quality control manuals whilst working in South Africa. He was accepted as a member of MENSA after passing the relevant tests. He has long been a staunch and studied critic of the greenhouse gas theory and is an outspoken commentator using his two websites as a publishing hub for fellow scientists critical of that theory.
Please consider a DONATION To Help Us With Server And Hosting Costs.
Global average temperature wasn’t an issue until the IPCC made it an issue. Their version is synthetic, sculpted to impress the impressionable. If you’re into it , you’ll buy their money – sucking carbon tax scheme, too.
China? India? Not worried at all.
You can talk about the climate, you can talk about the weather. Only fools believe we can do anything about it. Adapt . Work at things you can improve.
Has the AWG ‘consensus’ ever had a single prediction come to pass? They’ve had 35 years of making predictions – and I’ve never seen any report that even one prediction has come true.
Correct Hans on all points. I’m at 43N 79W Niagara Falls, Ontario. Give me the wind direction and I will give you the air temperature. The North American continent has a Westerly prevailing wind. S/SW gives us hot air and N/NW gives us cold air. These directions seem to cycle bi-weekly through an approximate 180 degrees arc. That pattern has been consistent for my 70 years of life, UNCHANGING.
Cheers
The trouble with liberals is they dint need or want any evidence all that matters to them is to acheive their goals and create the North American(Soviet)Union all run by the Useless Nations
To date, nobody on Earth has been able to replicate the so-called “greenhouse effect” experimentally in a laboratory or otherwise. However, there have been several laboratory experiments that have empirically demonstrated that a so-called “greenhouse effect” is impossible. Here is but one of those experiments: https://principia-scientific.org/filament-experiment-proves-co2-causes-temperature-to-fall-not-rise/
Thanks Squidly, here’s another one: http://www.biocab.org/Wood_Experiment_Repeated.html yet many well-known “skeptics” (CFACT, CEI, GWPF etc. etc.) accept that such a concept actually exists and they all refuse to debate the issue – yet they call themselves “skeptics”. There were, at one stage, some 67 versions of the effect – all of them debunked yet the idiocy over it continues.