A climate council that Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (pictured) established in 2019 suggested the Democratic governor implement a state carbon-tax plan to address climate change in a leaked draft of recommendations obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
A carbon tax could lower emissions and generate revenue for Montana’s economy, as well as expand the state’s private industry, a document from Montana’s Climate Solution Council reads.
The draft document, titled “Montana Climate Solutions Plan” and dated August 2020, has not been signed by Bullock but suggests several ways for the state to tackle climate change.
Four members of the 41-person council dissented to the recommendation to tax carbon emissions.
“A carbon pricing mechanism – if structured thoughtfully and with appropriate stakeholder input – has the ability to both lower emissions (through either a cap on emissions or through a price on carbon) as well as generate revenues that can be invested back into the economy to expand Montana business and/or further reduce Montana [greenhouse gas] emissions,” a section of the draft plan reads.
Bullock, a Democrat, is running in a tight Senate race against incumbent Republican Sen. Steve Daines.
“Montana should consider both the mechanism for pricing carbon (e.g., fee vs. cap), the efficacy of reducing carbon emissions, and how revenues generated from carbon pricing will be invested back into the economy,” the document said.
Such a tax should also consider “any disproportionate impacts to low-income and vulnerable communities,” it adds.
The four dissenting council members raised concerns “regarding the implementation of carbon pricing, its potential disproportionate impacts on Montana businesses and low-income communities, and potential for carbon pricing to compound [the] known challenges facing the state’s fiscal health,” according to the draft document.
The council has not responded to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment about the climate plan.
“The governor has not formally received the recommendations, which are in draft form, and it would be inaccurate to say the governor supports any of the recommendations in the report at this time,” Erin Loranger, press secretary for Bullock, said in a statement to the DCNF.
The draft noted that there is an “important need for considering the impacts of federal legislation on the state and its economy. The recommendation makes clear that any discussion at the federal level should include Montana stakeholders at the table,” Loranger added.
“This reckless proposal is a gut punch to the over 35,000 oil, gas, and coal jobs in Montana, not to mention the thousands of manufacturing and transportation jobs that would be crippled under such policy,” Daines wrote in a letter to Bullock.
“Montanans rely on these jobs to support their families and revenues from these industries support our schools, communities, and essential services.”
The governor announced in February that the Montana Climate Solutions Council rolled out a set of draft recommendations for reducing carbon emissions. The recommendations were issued for public review and comment through March 31, 2020.
“We are excited to share the early recommendations of the Montana Climate Solutions Council with partners and the public to encourage the engagement of all Montanans in the work of the Council as they identify and refine options to prepare our state and our economy for climate impacts,” Bullock said in a statement in February.
Nearly one-third of the nation’s coal reserves are in Montana, and the northern and eastern areas of the state contain deposits of crude oil and natural gas, according to the Energy Information Administration.
The United States has dramatically reduced its dependence on coal power, with natural gas and other renewable energies taking the place of coal.
Read rest at Daily Caller
Circular firing squad:
“A carbon tax could lower emissions and generate revenue for Montana’s economy, as well as expand the state’s private industry”
We’re going to take money away from Montana’s private businesses then expand that business by giving SOME of their money back after we take our cut.
How is that going to work? I’ll wait.
We don’t need anymore stupid taxes on something that’s only appearing on fake charts and faked Data and the politics and lies of the various Eco-Freaks and the Globalists
A carbon tax is just another tax. Nothing more. The only way any tax might reduce pollution, which by the way has nothing to do with CO2, is to make everything more expensive. Naturally, when stuff gets more expensive, some people simply stop buying it. Cap & trade is equally stunned. A company making widgets has such a demand they exceed some imaginary mythical limit of CO2 which would force them to buy other imaginary carbon credits from some jerk like Gore. The widget guy then simply adds this increased cost to his selling price and naturally includes their profit markup.
Example, for politicians, as I can’t draw pictures here:
Widget guy sells his widgets at 90 cents including his 10% profit margin. the State Carbon Tax charges him 10 cents/widget, so he ups his price to $1 plus his profit margin of 1 cent. What used to be a 90 cent widget with happy customers is now a $1.01 widget with fewer customers due to the price increase. Widget guy loses money and is forced to turn to a Chinese manufacturer who doesn’t give a damn about pollution. Money leaves the country, people lose their manufacturing jobs and pollution increases due to horrible Chinese pollution standards. Another politician’s brainwave. Obviously a Liberal or Democrat. Oh, that was already said in the article. How did I know?
Another dumb tax to pay for their pet projects Biden and Harris Dumb and Dumber are real