It seems that every day we’re force-fed nightmarish stories about how the Earth is constantly warming because there are too many humans and we consume too much oil, coal, natural gas, and even meat. [emphasis, links added]
The solution is always more government control, regulation, and higher taxes.
The powers that be seek to destroy companies that produce reasonably priced energy, and use the weight of government to force us to buy electric vehicles powered by the highly flammable pollutant lithium, and inefficient appliances.
It is a shame they refuse to recognize how our use of these natural resources has greatly improved mankind’s quality and length of life, allowing humans to survive hot summers and cold winters with central air and heat.
This article and headline are meant to spread pure propaganda to the public that the Earth has constantly warmed, but nothing could be further from the truth:
Is indoor summer the new normal? Climate change delivers scorching heat across America
For millions of Americans, rising global temperatures have transformed summertime, pushing them to spend more and more time each year inside air-conditioned spaces, sealed off from the sweltering outdoors.
…
While summer is the hottest season in the Northern Hemisphere, it has been getting even hotter thanks to climate change. In every decade since the 1960s, heat waves have become more frequent, last longer and pack higher temperatures, according to data from the Environmental Protection Agency. Between 1971 and 2000, average summer temperatures rose by 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit in the U.S., and by 2.7 degrees across much of the West.
If journalists were curious, instead of talking puppets pushing the Democrat agenda, they could ask a simple question like I did, and use a search engine to find the answer: “What are the warmest summers on record?”
The following information populated: The warmest summer on record was in 1936 during the Dust Bowl, which was before we had central air…so it was colder for more than eight decades, while the population was rising rapidly, and while our use of the natural resources (which supposedly causes warming) was exploding. (It should be noted that there was essentially no air conditioning of any type in 1936.)
Some of the other warm summers were in 1934, 1901, 1911, and 1913. They were clearly not caused by gas-powered cars, so getting rid of them can’t possibly change the temperature.
And, see this, from the LA Times:
July’s average temperature across the Golden State was 81.7 degrees, surpassing the prior record from July 2021 by almost two degrees, according to data published Thursday by the National Centers for Environmental Information, a division of NOAA. The agency’s statewide climate data goes back to 1895.
Why was it so hot in California in 1895? There weren’t cars, gas stoves, A/C units, and gas heating systems to worry about, so what gives?
When you have junk science, you end up with mad scientists.
The following article is about an egotistical idiot who believes we can override all the natural variables in the climate and control temperatures by shooting a pollutant into the atmosphere. What could go wrong? (via Yahoo! News)
Scientist Defends an Audacious Plan to Block Sunlight and Cool the Earth
Today, Keith cites that event as validation of an idea that has become his life’s work: He believes that by intentionally releasing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, it would be possible to lower temperatures worldwide, blunting global warming.
Anthony Fauci is also an example of a power-hungry mad scientist. He constantly supported government edicts based on nothing but lies, yet if anyone disagreed with him they were derided as anti-science, and accused of wanting people to die.
His pronouncements caused massive destruction in the economy and to children, yet most of the media and other Democrats continue to laud him.
If Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, or any other power-hungry Democrat pushing the destructive “green” agenda is ever willing to answer questions, and if the compliant media ever cared, they should be asked two simple questions:
1. Where is the scientific data that links our use of oil to global temperatures? Hint: There is none!
2. How could Earth have cooled from 1940–1975 if all the things you say cause warming did cause warming? If these “green” pushers believed in science, they would recognize that if there is no correlation, there can be no causation.
Kamala and the Democrats say that everything they do is focused on helping the poor and middle classes, along with tackling inflation, so why are they seeking to destroy so many companies that produce reasonably priced energy?
Their policies have caused crude oil to rise around 100% since Biden-Harris took office, and that alone destroys the purchasing power of average Americans, while the rich do just fine.
I would ask journalists and everyone else to name one tax or regulation that Democrats support that helps the poor and middle classes instead of helping the government become more powerful.
When will the media care?
Top photo by Ninan John on Unsplash
Read more at American Thinker
The anthropogenic warming/extreme weather argument is based on nothing more than a bunch of fraudulent climate models. The ‘attribution’ of an increase in ‘extreme weather’ to an increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases ramped up with the publication of the Third IPCC Climate Assessment Report (TAR) in 2001. However, the computer modeling fraud started with Manabe and Wetherald in 1967 and the foundation of the pseudoscience of radiative forcings, feedbacks and climate sensitivity was established by Hansen et al in 1981. The basic steady state air column model was first described by Arrhenius in 1896.
A detailed description of the development of these fraudulent models is given in the paper ‘A Nobel Prize for Climate Modeling Errors’, Science of Climate Change 4(1) pp. 1-73 (2024) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202404/17.
And yes, Manabe was awarded part of the 2021 Nobel Prize in physics for climate modeling errors.
To R. Greene:
#1 What was the number of cars/trucks in 1940 USA? What number in 1975?
#2 What was the number of commercial & residential AC units in 1940? In 1975?
#3 between 1940 – 1970, there was not even ANY measure to reduce the
pollutants released by burning fossil fuels in autos & trucks.
Those pollutants released have been MASSIVELY Reduced since 1970.
#4 Notice the population numbers and infrastructure amounts in OUR large
cities from 1940-1970. Compare with those numbers INCREASED from 1970-2000.
POINT BEING the placement of taking readings in OUR large, VERY Cemented urban centers is giving False indications of OUR Country overall. As Our country is still
about 70%-80% undeveloped, place the reading instruments across those areas to
get TRURE indications about rising temperatures in OUR Country – I It’s ENTIRETY!
Climate researchers had to have known that air pollution abatement would let more of the sun’s energy reach the earth’s surface. The encroachment of cities on data collection stations adds to new temperature records. There is plenty of proof that urban temperatures are higher, I don’t dispute that. Edward is right, they extrapolate these elevated readings to the majority of the country that isn’t paved over, but put the blame on rising CO2 readings. It is deliberate and unscientific.
We get the relentless propaganda in the headlines daily.
Well said Edward.
The author is ignorant on the subject of climate science and should be ignored. He starts by conflating TMAX with TAVG and goes downhill from there.
2023 was the warmest year in the instrument record. That fact that the US, 1.5% of global surface area, had a very hot summer in 1936 is irrelevant. Greenhouse warming mainly affects TMIN, not TMAX.
The claim there is no connection between buring hydrocarbon fuels and the globa average temperature is wht you hear fromm gnorant science eniers.
Th claim that global cooling from 1940 to 1975 proves CO does nothing is another ignorant claim. The growth of atmospheric CO2 was only 7% in that period, a minor climate change variable before 1975, offset by global cooling from increasing air pollution that blocked sunlight.
American Thinker usually has decent articles
Not this one.
The increase in TMIN is the result of urban heat. Pavement and building materials retain heat overnight more than grass and trees. Cities have over-run the data collection sites, especially airports where most of them are located.
Evolution is a poor comparison which, unlike the notion of rapidly rising temperatures, has been observed in various ways, including in short lifespan organisms such as fruitflies. But the completely false claims of dangerous warming and climate change have been drilled into many heads, resulting in damage to the environment and all of us.
Use the false threat of Global Warming/Climate Change I mean like repeating a Lie long enough i until people believe it its just like with Evolution A unproven Theory being taught as the truth