• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Hurricane Forecasts Are Fizzling Out, Leaving Some Climate Scientists Scrambling

by Kevin Killough
September 17, 2024, 10:29 AM
in Extreme Weather, News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
1

hurricane landfall

Penn State celebrity climate scientist Michael Mann announced in April that his research group’s 2024 North Atlantic season forecast was expecting an “unprecedented” 33 named storms, with a range between 27 and 39. [emphasis, links added]

That prediction has turned out to be a dud.

With Hurricane Francine hitting the coasts Thursday, the total number of named storms only comes to six, making it one of the quietest hurricane seasons to date. The Atlantic hurricane season continues through Nov. 30.

It’s possible, but highly unlikely, that the season will produce 27 more named storms and make Mann’s prediction accurate.

“Scientists can make successful seasonal predictions based on the climate information they have, providing grounds for trust in longer-term climate predictions, particularly human-caused warming and its impacts,” a report on Mann’s forecast in the Penn State publication Penn Today explained.

In the politicized world of climate science, the science is supposed to be “settled.” Those who have doubts about climate change predictions are labeled deniers. So, failed forecasts have scientists eating crow.

mann Amanpour
Christiane Amanpour’s softball interview with Michael E Mann.

Mann’s prediction received the usual media attention from a number of different outlets, making references to how warming oceans and climate change were fueling extreme weather events.

Now with the hurricane season refusing to produce the “turbocharged” extreme weather that climate journalists have been warning about, these reporters are worried that people will start to doubt the alarm.

Mann is infamous for suing critics of his work for defamation.

The Washington Post noted that it’s the “longest stretch in more than half a century without a single late-summer cyclone.”

Meteorologists, the Post reports, are “wrestling with confusion” and hoping they can still “protect the delicate public trust.”

Universities, private entities, and government agencies make predictions every year on what the season may look like, including the number of hurricanes and major hurricanes.

Mann’s Research Group wasn’t the only university entity whose models predicted an above-normal season.

Colorado State University (CSU) researchers are considered some of the most reliable forecasters, and they predicted the season would be “extremely active.”

A tropical storm is named when its winds hit 39 mph or higher. When winds reach 74 mph, the named storm is classified as a hurricane. The CSU researchers predicted 20-26 hurricanes, and there have only been four.

The Barcelona Supercomputing Center hosts a chart of the various organizations’ forecast models for the season. There are different types of organizations, different model types, different forecast metrics, and different times of the season the forecasts are released.

Mann’s Research Group — marked as PENN on the Barcelona chart — stands out high above the others, but most models were predicting an unusually high number of named storms, including CSU.

The same is true for hurricanes, though Mann’s group doesn’t have a separate forecast for hurricanes.

Research meteorologist Ryan Maue told Just the News that there are different approaches to modeling and different motivations.

Universities and government entities, for example, are going to have different reasons for making forecasts than private companies.

“Sometimes people put out the seasonal forecasts at certain times of the year for branding and advertising for their products,” Maue said.

Trying to come to some average across them all wouldn’t produce a useful metric, he explained. It would be like an election forecaster weighing all polls the same.

Polls are done with different questions, from different groups with different agendas, different sample sizes, and different margins of error.

Mann’s Research Group openly posts their past forecasts and how they hold up to the actual counts. Where they’ve been off, it’s usually because they were too low.

In 2021, 2022, and 2023, the group’s forecast range for the number of named storms was accurate. In 2020, there were 30 named storms, and the team projected 15-24. Same with 2019 — they predicted 7-13, and there were 18.

Phil Klotzbach with CSU published a 30-page examination of why the CSU forecast doesn’t appear to be panning out. Klotzbach still predicts an above-normal season with more activity appearing in the middle of September.

“I would entertain an argument that something about the Atlantic has changed. It’s maybe warmed to the point where the Atlantic warmth compared to the rest of the tropics, that difference has decreased. And it’s more difficult to produce tropical cyclones like that,” Maue proposed.

These predictions are used in all kinds of ways. They help people who live on the coasts to prepare. They help the insurance industry. They help energy markets, as a lot of U.S. refining capacity is on the Gulf Coast.

“This is very important work, and the more eyes on it, the better,” Maue said.

Climate science is full of uncertainties and nuance, so it’s not surprising that forecasting complex models is a difficult process with a lot of trial and error.

Perhaps if climate scientists were more focused on improving models than fighting “deniers,” inaccurate forecasts would be widely accepted as part of the process.

Just the News reached out to Mann for comment but didn’t receive a response.

Read more at Just The News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    1 year ago

    Mann is a Con Artists trying to sell his Snake Oil to the same Gullible fools who bought Gores two fake films and Books and recited Gores stupid poem

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • WMO reportHow The World Meteorological Organization Lies To You—Using Your Taxes
    Oct 22, 2025
    The WMO’s 2025 greenhouse gas report hides key data that undercuts the so-called climate 'crisis' narrative—funded by your tax dollars. […]
  • Hurricane generating ocean waves2025 Hurricane Season Is Flopping As Alarmist Predictions Fail
    Oct 22, 2025
    The 2025 hurricane season so far has seen no major U.S. landfalls, exposing alarmists’ failed predictions of catastrophic storms. […]
  • africa cookingAmerica’s Policy Shift Gives Developing Nations Freedom To Harness Fossil Fuels
    Oct 22, 2025
    New U.S. energy policy lets developing nations use fossil fuels to power factories and boost economic growth. […]
  • How Geological Heat Powers Greenland’s Vast Subglacial Rivers And Lakes
    Oct 22, 2025
    Research reveals that Greenland's vast, active network of rivers, streams, and lakes beneath its ice was largely created by geothermal heat. […]
  • France Aude wildfireWhen Climate Science Gets Ignored, Weather Porn Drives Headlines And Policy
    Oct 21, 2025
    Climate warnings rely on debunked, overstated science, so when new data disproves the scare, media and officials stay largely silent. […]
  • Markey Warren, the OGs of the Green New ScamDems Dial Back Climate Alarm, Pivot To Soaring Electricity Bills They Caused
    Oct 21, 2025
    Democrats downplay climate policy as they shift to rising electricity costs that their green policies and unsustainable subsidies caused. […]
  • climate griftThe Climate Grift Unravels: Sec. Wright Saves Billions By Canceling Wasteful Projects
    Oct 21, 2025
    Secretary Wright has exposed Biden-era climate waste, clawing back billions lost to corruption and green boondoggles. […]
  • Unloading cargo shipRough Seas Ahead: The Coming Fight Over Net Zero Shipping
    Oct 20, 2025
    Net-zero shipping can’t work — but that won’t stop UN bureaucrats from trying to institute a carbon tax again and profiting off its failure. […]
  • Eagle sits on power pole near wind farmSecretary Burgum Orders Crackdown On Wind Turbines Killing Bald And Golden Eagles
    Oct 20, 2025
    Secretary Burgum orders action against wind turbines killing Bald and Golden Eagles, targeting years of government neglect. […]
  • day after tomorrowNew Study Shows AMOC Stable, Contradicting Alarmist Narrative
    Oct 20, 2025
    New research finds the AMOC is stable, challenging claims that the Atlantic current is weakening and triggering extreme cooling. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky