• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Hurricane Forecasts Are Fizzling Out, Leaving Some Climate Scientists Scrambling

by Kevin Killough
September 17, 2024, 10:29 AM
in Extreme Weather, News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
1

hurricane landfall

Penn State celebrity climate scientist Michael Mann announced in April that his research group’s 2024 North Atlantic season forecast was expecting an “unprecedented” 33 named storms, with a range between 27 and 39. [emphasis, links added]

That prediction has turned out to be a dud.

With Hurricane Francine hitting the coasts Thursday, the total number of named storms only comes to six, making it one of the quietest hurricane seasons to date. The Atlantic hurricane season continues through Nov. 30.

It’s possible, but highly unlikely, that the season will produce 27 more named storms and make Mann’s prediction accurate.

“Scientists can make successful seasonal predictions based on the climate information they have, providing grounds for trust in longer-term climate predictions, particularly human-caused warming and its impacts,” a report on Mann’s forecast in the Penn State publication Penn Today explained.

In the politicized world of climate science, the science is supposed to be “settled.” Those who have doubts about climate change predictions are labeled deniers. So, failed forecasts have scientists eating crow.

mann Amanpour
Christiane Amanpour’s softball interview with Michael E Mann.

Mann’s prediction received the usual media attention from a number of different outlets, making references to how warming oceans and climate change were fueling extreme weather events.

Now with the hurricane season refusing to produce the “turbocharged” extreme weather that climate journalists have been warning about, these reporters are worried that people will start to doubt the alarm.

Mann is infamous for suing critics of his work for defamation.

The Washington Post noted that it’s the “longest stretch in more than half a century without a single late-summer cyclone.”

Meteorologists, the Post reports, are “wrestling with confusion” and hoping they can still “protect the delicate public trust.”

Universities, private entities, and government agencies make predictions every year on what the season may look like, including the number of hurricanes and major hurricanes.

Mann’s Research Group wasn’t the only university entity whose models predicted an above-normal season.

Colorado State University (CSU) researchers are considered some of the most reliable forecasters, and they predicted the season would be “extremely active.”

A tropical storm is named when its winds hit 39 mph or higher. When winds reach 74 mph, the named storm is classified as a hurricane. The CSU researchers predicted 20-26 hurricanes, and there have only been four.

The Barcelona Supercomputing Center hosts a chart of the various organizations’ forecast models for the season. There are different types of organizations, different model types, different forecast metrics, and different times of the season the forecasts are released.

Mann’s Research Group — marked as PENN on the Barcelona chart — stands out high above the others, but most models were predicting an unusually high number of named storms, including CSU.

The same is true for hurricanes, though Mann’s group doesn’t have a separate forecast for hurricanes.

Research meteorologist Ryan Maue told Just the News that there are different approaches to modeling and different motivations.

Universities and government entities, for example, are going to have different reasons for making forecasts than private companies.

“Sometimes people put out the seasonal forecasts at certain times of the year for branding and advertising for their products,” Maue said.

Trying to come to some average across them all wouldn’t produce a useful metric, he explained. It would be like an election forecaster weighing all polls the same.

Polls are done with different questions, from different groups with different agendas, different sample sizes, and different margins of error.

Mann’s Research Group openly posts their past forecasts and how they hold up to the actual counts. Where they’ve been off, it’s usually because they were too low.

In 2021, 2022, and 2023, the group’s forecast range for the number of named storms was accurate. In 2020, there were 30 named storms, and the team projected 15-24. Same with 2019 — they predicted 7-13, and there were 18.

Phil Klotzbach with CSU published a 30-page examination of why the CSU forecast doesn’t appear to be panning out. Klotzbach still predicts an above-normal season with more activity appearing in the middle of September.

“I would entertain an argument that something about the Atlantic has changed. It’s maybe warmed to the point where the Atlantic warmth compared to the rest of the tropics, that difference has decreased. And it’s more difficult to produce tropical cyclones like that,” Maue proposed.

These predictions are used in all kinds of ways. They help people who live on the coasts to prepare. They help the insurance industry. They help energy markets, as a lot of U.S. refining capacity is on the Gulf Coast.

“This is very important work, and the more eyes on it, the better,” Maue said.

Climate science is full of uncertainties and nuance, so it’s not surprising that forecasting complex models is a difficult process with a lot of trial and error.

Perhaps if climate scientists were more focused on improving models than fighting “deniers,” inaccurate forecasts would be widely accepted as part of the process.

Just the News reached out to Mann for comment but didn’t receive a response.

Read more at Just The News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    1 year ago

    Mann is a Con Artists trying to sell his Snake Oil to the same Gullible fools who bought Gores two fake films and Books and recited Gores stupid poem

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Gavin Newsom Sao PaoloNewsom Accuses Trump Of Giving Brazil The ‘Middle Finger’ With Tariffs, Skipping COP30
    Nov 11, 2025
    Newsom blasted Trump for slapping tariffs on Brazil over human rights abuses and skipping COP30, calling it a diplomatic ‘middle finger.’ […]
  • Belem shanty by the riverCOP30 In Belém Exposes Climate Elites’ Rank Hypocrisy
    Nov 11, 2025
    Belém faces raw sewage and poor sanitation as COP30 delegates lecture on emissions, ignoring actual eco-crises harming millions today. […]
  • Pres. Lula COP30Brazil’s Lula Calls For Climate Truth At COP30, But Facts Tell A Different Story
    Nov 11, 2025
    Lula vowed truth would save the planet at Brazil COP30, but the facts on Net Zero and the Paris Agreement tell a harsher story. […]
  • Hurricane winds key west2025 Hurricane Forecast Was Overly Alarmist (Again)… Atlantic Season Ending Near Normal
    Nov 10, 2025
    NOAA’s 2025 hurricane forecast hyped an active season, but storm activity is ending up close to average. […]
  • protest global warningAs The Left Tunes Out Climate Change, Democrats Push Costly Green Energy
    Nov 10, 2025
    As the Left tunes out climate change, Dems pivot to costly green energy framed around affordability. […]
  • COP30Climate Doom Patrol: COP30 Opens In Brazil As Top Emitters Skip Summit
    Nov 10, 2025
    COP30 kicks off in Brazil as top emitters skip, and the Amazon is cleared for a summit road that goes nowhere. […]
  • BBC headquartersBBC Launches Investigation Into Bias Of Its Climate Change Coverage
    Nov 10, 2025
    The BBC will investigate its climate change coverage as the broadcaster faces a mounting credibility crisis. […]
  • lana iiiLula’s Diesel-Guzzling Hotel Boat Heads To COP30 Climate Summit
    Nov 7, 2025
    Brazilian President Lula’s hotel boat will burn 4,000 liters of diesel to attend COP30, highlighting climate hypocrisy. […]
  • Queasy cowUdder Chaos: Cows Collapse After Eating Danish Gov’t’s Methane-Lowering Feed
    Nov 7, 2025
    Danish cows are collapsing after the gov’t pushes methane-lowering, greenie-drugged feed, sparking outrage among farmers. […]
  • GreenlandNew Study: Greenland Ice Melt Still Defies Alarmist Warming Claims
    Nov 7, 2025
    New study finds Greenland has had almost no net warming over the past century, challenging alarmist climate claims of rapid ice melt and sea level rise. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky