• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Hochul Signs $75B Climate Superfund Act Targeting Oil And Gas Firms For CO2 Emissions

Critics Say Customers Will Really Foot The Tab

by David Unsworth
December 27, 2024, 10:15 AM
in Energy, Lawfare, News, Politics
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
7

gas station shell
Today New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law the Climate Change Superfund Act, which will charge oil and gas firms an estimated $75 billion over the next 25 years. [emphasis, links added]

The controversial measure, sponsored by Senator Liz Krueger and Assembly Member Jeffrey Dinowitz, is modeled on federal and state superfund laws, which charge firms accused of pollution.

While environmental groups heralded the legislation, business groups argued that it would increase the cost of doing business in the state and that consumers would ultimately bear the brunt in terms of higher energy prices.

“The Climate Change Superfund Act is now law,” said Senator Krueger. “Too often over the last decade, courts have dismissed lawsuits against the oil and gas industry by saying that the issue of climate culpability should be decided by legislatures. Well, the Legislature of the State of New York – the 10th largest economy in the world – has accepted the invitation, and I hope we have made ourselves very clear: the planet’s largest climate polluters bear a unique responsibility for creating the climate crisis, and they must pay their fair share to help regular New Yorkers deal with the consequences.”

However, critics have deemed the bill impractical and contend that it will be subject to protracted legal challenges.

“What would you have them do? Not sell fuel in New York State,” said Ken Pokalsky, vice president of the New York State Business Council.

A group of business and industry leaders also lambasted the measure:

“This legislation is bad public policy that raises significant implementation questions and constitutional concerns. Moreover, its $75 billion price tag will result in unintended consequences and increased costs for households and businesses.”

However, Gov. Hochul heralded the legislation as a victory for the state’s citizens, stating that the funds would be used for climate mitigation efforts.

“This bill would allow the state to recoup $75 billion from major polluters…For too long New Yorkers have borne the costs of the climate crisis, which is impacting every part of the state.”

gas pump station

The bill will result in significant assessments for both domestic and foreign energy producers, with Saudi Aramco of Saudi Arabia likely facing the largest charge at $640 million a year, while state-owned Mexican firm Pemex will be looking at a $193 million annual charge.

Russia’s Lukoil will likely face charges of around $100 million per year.

The assessments are based on estimated yearly CO2 emissions, measured in millions of tons of greenhouse gases.

In total, 38 firms deemed carbon polluters will be on the hook, including American oil giants Exxon and Chevron, the UK’s Shell and BP, and Brazil’s Petrobras.

Critics of the legislation have also noted the potential difficulty in collecting the stipulated assessments from foreign firms.

The bill is also concerning consumer advocacy groups in light of its implementation in conjunction with other new measures that stand to greatly affect commuters and consumers:

“We also note this measure would come on the heels of the reinstatement of congestion pricing in New York City, and in advance of the Environmental Department’s pending `cap and invest’ rule, which combined will also impose billions of dollars in new assessments on fossil fuel usage, impacting a wide range of consumers,” stated bill opponents.

Read more at Fox News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 7

  1. Terry Mains says:
    2 years ago

    Hochol is one of the reasons that there are many people fleeing this state, just like California. No one with a functional brain will remain in this state when governments make decisions like this, that will do nothing but increase the cost of living. As soon as reality hits, there will be an exodus. It is presently happening in British Columbia where I live.
    When the average family cannot afford to buy a home and having difficulty putting food on the table they will leave.
    Government spending on ridiculous issues like the so called climate change issue, which is nothing but a massive globalist hoax, will be an incentive to do one of two things; re- elect a new government or leave.

    Reply
  2. David Lewis says:
    2 years ago

    The three motivations that started the global warming movement were an excuse for new taxes and increasing existing taxes, force deindustrialization, and increase the size and power of government. Only the most naive or mentally challenged believe the $75 billion will come out of cooperate profits. The oil companies will cover the cost by increasing prices. That has an identical impact as a tax. With a population of 19.57 million, just the cost of the $75 billion that will be passed on to consumers will be $3,822 per person of the effective period of the legislation. The cost to consumers will be greater than just what they pay for energy. If you got it, a truck brought it. Most goods have at least two truck trips, one to the distribution center and second from there to retail store. The cost of the fuel for these delivers will be higher and that will also be passed on to the consumers.

    Steve Bunten is right in that people are already fleeing the state. The cost of Superfund Act and other measures that will increase the cost to consumers will increase the exodus. The people leaving will not be the homeless drug users but rather the mechanics and engineers and other professions needed by any state.

    Reply
  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    Time has come to Vote Out the Liberal Democrat/Globalists their the Real Enemies of America and the Enviroment they claim they want to Protect for Newsom the Nuisance

    Reply
  4. alan stewart says:
    2 years ago

    Hochul and the rest of you morons. There’s a New Sheriff in town. Your idiot law is legal Nowheresville. The Internet has taken over and you’re DEAD POLITICAL MEAT.

    Reply
  5. Steve Bunten says:
    2 years ago

    California is finding out what happens when they make doing business in the state for refiners–they refineries announce they are closing shop with one of the largest refineries in the state shutting down instead of dealing with the ever increasing cost of doing business in the state. NY state may soon find the same thing happening.

    And I guess these fools for politicians don’t see what is happening in their states. California is leading the way with their citizens fleeing to states that are still open for business with NY next in line. Both have lost enough population that they lost legislative seats in Congress to red states like Texas, Florida, NC, etc… Keep doing what you do and find your population and tax revenue plummet.

    Reply
  6. ddwieland says:
    2 years ago

    There’s apparently no end to the useless and stupidly damaging laws that dogmatic nature deniers, a.k.a. climate alarmists, inflict on us. Start with science denial, add an appetite for authoritarian decree, and you get Hochul and her ilk.

    Reply
  7. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    Always count on a Demo-Rat to lay stupid and useless laws upon their Citizens like our own Governor Nuisance I mean Globalists need to be Voted Out and that means Voting out Liberal Demo-Rats

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • hawaii tropical cycloneThe El Niño Paradox — Calmer Atlantic Hurricane Season, Wilder Pacific Cyclones
    Jul 27, 2026
    El Niño means fewer Atlantic hurricanes, but tropical cyclone activity rises worldwide, with U.S. damage costs telling a different story. […]
  • german defunct car factoryEurope’s ‘Green’ Energy Transition Is A Delusion, Global Data Shows
    Jul 27, 2026
    An Energy Institute report shows Europe's energy transition is a costly climate illusion — while fossil fuels power record global growth elsewhere. […]
  • cartoon climate asylumOne Year After The ICJ’s Climate Ruling, The Cult Just Won’t Quit
    Jul 27, 2026
    One year after the UN's ICJ climate ruling, climate alarmism refuses to fade — despite mounting data undercutting the doomsday narrative. […]
  • NAS weather witchesHow Do You Get Science 180 Degrees Backwards? Ask the National Academy Of Sciences
    Jul 24, 2026
    The National Academies got causation backwards in a court manual, and now its extreme weather report goes all in on attribution pseudoscience. […]
  • cars vehicles roadwaySenate GOP Unveils First-of-Its-Kind Bill To Kill Costly Fuel Economy Standards
    Jul 24, 2026
    Supporters say the measure would lower vehicle costs by ending decades-old CAFE rules they argue have functioned as a de facto EV mandate. […]
  • Ships have switched to low-sulfur diesel, which has reduced aerosol emissions that block the sun.Scientists Now Blame Reduced Aerosol Emissions For Rising Temperatures
    Jul 24, 2026
    A new study blames Europe's heat waves and rising temperatures on reduced aerosol emissions — the unintended fallout of decades of cleaner air. […]
  • ambulance seattleDespite Doubts, Judge Allows Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Big Oil To Proceed
    Jul 23, 2026
    Rockefeller-funded groups push a new legal theory as a wrongful death lawsuit against Big Oil survives dismissal — but the judge remains skeptical. […]
  • With gas prices higher since the Iran conflict, a windfall profits tax would only raise pump prices.Dems’ Windfall Profits Tax On Oil Companies Would Raise Energy Prices, Experts Warn
    Jul 23, 2026
    Oil industry advocates say Democrats' windfall profits tax bill would punish investors and drive up energy costs without lowering prices at the pump. […]
  • wildfire smoke blankets a faraway cityThe Wildfire Smoke Is Serious — Blaming Climate Change Isn’t
    Jul 23, 2026
    Wildfire smoke keeps making headlines as proof of climate change, but global burned-area data tells a very different story. […]
  • A large bulk cargo ship being loaded with coal at a Southeast Asian industrial portNet Zero? Global Coal Consumption Just Hit an All-Time High
    Jul 22, 2026
    Global coal consumption hit an all-time high in 2025, and even net-zero pledges couldn't stop the fuel's resurgence. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky