• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Gallup: Only 4% of Americans Own An EV, 41% ‘Unequivocally’ Won’t Buy One

by Michael W. Chapman
April 14, 2023, 1:05 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
13

electric vehicles only signAlthough the Biden administration is using tax credits and emissions regulations to try to compel more Americans to buy electric cars, a new poll shows that only 4% of Americans own an electric vehicle (EV) and only 12% are “seriously considering” buying one.

On the other hand, 43% said they might consider buying an EV sometime in the future and 41% unequivocally said they would not buy one. [emphasis, links added]

“Americans’ adoption of electric vehicles is proving to be slow,” said Gallup in reference to its March 1-23 poll.

In addition, the survey found that “While about four in 10 U.S. adults think using EVs helps address climate change a ‘great deal’ (12%) or a ‘fair amount’ (27%), roughly six in 10 believe it helps ‘only a little’ (35%) or ‘not at all’ (26%). [Total: 61%]”

On the political scale, Democrats are more likely to be EV-friendly but Republicans are not keen on the product.

For instance, Gallup asked, “Thinking now about electric vehicles, which of the following applies to you — you currently own an electric vehicle, you are seriously considering buying an electric vehicle, you might consider buying an electric vehicle in the future, or you would not buy an electric vehicle?”

In response, 6% of Democrats said they own an EC and 22% are “seriously considering” buying one. 54% said they might consider it in the future and 17% said flat-out no.

For Republicans, about 1% said they currently own an EV or were seriously considering purchasing one. However, 26% said they might consider buying one in the future while 71% said flat-out no.

For Independents, the respective percentages were 4%, 11%, 47%, and 38% (see chart).

When it comes to EVs and their effect on climate change, 55% of Republicans said no effect, and 32% said “only a little.”

For Democrats, however, 22% said the effect was “a great deal” and 46% said “a fair amount.” (See chart.)

“While ownership of electric vehicles is on the rise in the U.S., the percentage of Americans who say they own one remains limited at 4%,” reported Gallup.

“Though they are often promoted as a key way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and address the effects of climate change, the public remains largely unconvinced that the use of EVs accomplishes this aim.”

The survey team noted that the Biden administration has “set a goal that half of all new vehicle sales be electric by 2030” and “the state of California has mandated that all new vehicle sales in the state by the year 2035 must be zero-emission vehicles….”

The Biden administration also announced on April 12 that it wants to impose tougher emissions rules to compel carmakers to build more EVs by 2032.

“Depending on how automakers comply, the EPA projects that at least 60% of new passenger vehicles sold in the U.S. would be electric by 2030 and up to 67% by 2032,” reported the Associated Press.

According to Cox Automotive, the parent of Kelley Blue Book, “the average transaction price for electric cars was $65,291 in September 2022.

By comparison, gas-powered vehicles cost less, with an average transaction price of about $48,100 in the same timeframe.”

To read the survey, click here.

Read more at CNSNews

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Comments 13

  1. Brian James says:
    3 years ago

    Nov 1, 2022 Electric Cars: Inconvenient Facts, Part One

    Politicians and activists who want all cars to go electric are guilty of magical thinking.

    https://youtu.be/z2HneqfZGsM

    Reply
  2. Gary Brown says:
    3 years ago

    January 26, 2023Wyoming Denounces Electric Vehicles To Support Oil and Gas

    “We are supporting our industries that have been around for 100 years supporting us and we want to support them now,” Anderson added in the “Fox & Friends First” interview. “We think there’s 12 years left and some of those states [banning the sale of gas-powered vehicles] might change their mind by that time and see the petroleum-product vehicles are not so bad.” States planning to ban gas-powered vehicles include California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington.

    https://heartlanddailynews.com/2023/01/wyoming-denounces-electric-vehicles-to-support-oil-and-gas/

    Nov 1, 2022 Electric Cars: Inconvenient Facts, Part One

    Politicians and activists who want all cars to go electric are guilty of magical thinking.

    https://youtu.be/z2HneqfZGsM

    Reply
  3. Drewski says:
    3 years ago

    Fortuately the US is not the only country that is adopting electric vehicles. As ECV emissions ranks only 2nd to power generation in CO2 emissions, switching over to electric vehicles, marks a significant development for reducing greenhouse gasses

    Reply
    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Some of your worst comments ever, Drewski. An EV vs a conventional car is like the difference between fibre optic and dial up??? Waiting for your EV to charge along the Interstate IS dial – up. Good time to do the NY Times crossword puzzle. “HUNDREDS of new vehicle makers?”
      Two hundred? Three hundred? How many survive? Don’t post your comments under the influence.

      Reply
  4. Drewski says:
    3 years ago

    I remember a time when 2 out of 3 Americans said that wouldn’t get a smart phone either. What happened?
    Driving an electric vehicle is like going from dial up internet to fibre optic internet. The invotion coming out of the HUNDREDS of new automakers is quite astounding ESPECIALLY in battery development.

    Reply
    • Colin Joseph Harkin says:
      3 years ago

      Drewski, let’s clarify one thing. Your smart phone is powered by a battery making it a “battery” phone. EV’s are not electric, they are powered by a (very large) battery meaning they are battery cars. some call them battery electric cars – BEV’s.

      With regards to BEV’s, it would help you to better understand the fullness of the subject by reading the attached. There is no logical connection between a BEV and smart phone because the SP technolgy that brings real tangible benefits to all. Regarding the BEV, there are many options for people, like avoiding an expensive BEV with questionable resale value after it’s travelled some distance and certainly no tangible benefits when compared to an ICEV.

      The one issuse alone that really bothers me most is the children in the Congo working in a Chinese owned cobolt mine. Have you seen some of the disgusting vision in TV showing what those kids are doing for a few cents per day?

      https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2020/07/The-Battery-Car-Delusion.pdf?trk=public_post_comment-text

      Reply
      • Drewski says:
        3 years ago

        “Drewski, let’s clarify one thing. Your smart phone is powered by a battery making it a “battery” phone. EV’s are not electric, they are powered by a (very large) battery meaning they are battery cars. some call them battery electric cars – BEV’s.”
        So EVs (electric vehicles) are not electric. Got it.
        Colin, let ME clarify one thing – I did NOT compare batteries in phones to batteries in cars! I was comparing a survey of people who said 17 years ago that they would not use a product (smart phone) and, of course, that turned out to be complete horse pucky.
        Just like the present day survey on electric vehicles quoted in the article above.

        Reply
    • David Lewis says:
      3 years ago

      There is a big difference between smart phones and electric vehicles. Most can afford a smart phone. The average family in the US can not afford a brand new internal combustion vehicle let a lone a more expensive electric one. With inflation driven by government spending, energy costs, and other factors I’m sure that the ability to afford an EV is declining. People won’t being buying what they can’t afford.

      Reply
  5. Shoki Kaneda says:
    3 years ago

    Anyone who thinks EVs benefit the environment have no concept of total lifecycle cost.

    Reply
  6. Tuco's Child says:
    3 years ago

    On a perfect day, adopting EVs will not make one iota of difference to lowering greenhouse gases, per their own data!:

    Total USA EV Adoption Will Only Reduce Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2.5 %
    Base data presented by the US EPA and others is self contradictory in their promotion of EVs as a solution to global warming

    https://tucoschild.substack.com/p/usa-ev-adoption-will-only-reduce

    Reply
  7. Charles Wardrop says:
    3 years ago

    Taking account of all the Green features any product, installation, purporting to be a substitute for any established present products-EVs,windmills, house heaters,etc. must be assessed for the many costs of its manufacturing, immediate drawbacks and long term non-Greenp problems.
    Consideration of these matters makes EVs a very definite No, No!
    They are complete disaster, except for their good accelerating and quiet engines.
    Even the hazards pedestrians.
    Does Mr Biden know or care

    Reply
    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      Yes, an accurate cost benefits analysis for the Green energy transition would be welcome. There’s a short cut. Intuition. A hunch. If it looks like junk, you don’t have to buy it to find out.

      Reply
  8. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    This wont stop Biden and his EPA from forcing EV’s upon us Biden a is a Globalists and scum sucker

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • glacier sun meltAncient Artifacts Prove Glaciers Come And Go Naturally — No CO2 Required
    Jun 8, 2026
    Ancient artifacts emerging from melting ice prove glaciers have always come and gone — long before industrial CO2 entered the picture. […]
  • farmer billboard carbon taxArkansas Senate Candidate Slams Tom Cotton for High Gas Prices—After Pushing For Carbon Tax
    Jun 8, 2026
    Arkansas Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner blasted Tom Cotton over gas prices despite previously backing a carbon tax that would slam farmers. […]
  • khan london greensClimate Hypocrite Sadiq Khan Targets North London’s ‘Green’ Spaces
    Jun 8, 2026
    Sadiq Khan pushes ahead with Enfield New Towns scheme despite voters backing green belt protection 3-to-1. […]
  • refinery newsom chevronClimate Change Superstition Still Rules California
    Jun 5, 2026
    California's climate dogma is closing refineries and driving gas prices higher, all based on the state's pervasive global warming superstition. […]
  • End Climate Injustice signScientists Warn Judges Are Being Fed A Rigged Evidence Playbook
    Jun 5, 2026
    Activists have injected agenda-driven consensus into rules of scientific evidence; Chief Justice Roberts has the power to change it back. […]
  • news van black bearBlack Bears Are Thriving In Tennessee — So Why Is The Media Crying Wolf?
    Jun 5, 2026
    Tennessee's black bear population is booming — but WPLN blamed climate change anyway. Here's what the data actually shows. […]
  • cartoon rip climate desksNPR Joins The Climate Journalism Graveyard
    Jun 5, 2026
    NPR has axed its climate desk, becoming the third major outlet to shutter its climate team, following the Washington Post and CBS News. […]
  • golden eagleWyoming’s Golden Eagles Face Extinction As Wind Farms Multiply
    Jun 4, 2026
    Wyoming's golden eagle population has dropped 30% in 20 years. Wind farms are the culprit, and the Endangered Species Act may be the only fix. […]
  • UK electric car chargingCarmakers To Miliband: Your Net Zero Targets Don’t Add Up
    Jun 4, 2026
    Carmakers say Miliband's carbon budget assumes 95% of auto sales will be electric by 2030 — a target the industry calls unrealistic given current demand. […]
  • judge influenceHouse Judiciary Escalates Climate Lawfare Probe With First Subpoena
    Jun 4, 2026
    The House Judiciary Committee has issued its first subpoena in the probe into a coordinated litigation campaign targeting American energy companies. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky