• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Senate GOP Unveils First-of-Its-Kind Bill To Kill Costly Fuel Economy Standards

Oil Crisis Relic? Sen. Mike Crapo's legislation would end the 50-year-old CAFE program blamed for driving up car prices.

by Thomas Catenacci
July 24, 2026, 12:24 PM
in Energy, Money & Finance, News, Politics
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
3

cars vehicles roadway
Sen. Mike Crapo (R., Idaho) is preparing to introduce first-of-its-kind legislation that would scrap fuel economy rules for vehicles, regulations that Republicans say have cost consumers billions of dollars, the Washington Free Beacon has learned. [some emphasis, links added]

Crapo’s bill would end a decades-old program requiring the federal government to set environmental fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks.

Crapo, the Senate Finance Committee’s chairman, says the bill would save Americans money and ensure the federal government cannot use the so-called corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) program to implement a “de facto electric vehicle mandate” or other broad climate objectives.

The bill is not a symbolic one. It has five Senate cosponsors, all Republicans, and strong backing from major industry groups. It’s also being introduced in time to clear Congress before any shift of control in January.

The Biden administration finalized CAFE standards in 2024 that would have doubled fuel-efficiency requirements for new cars, something automakers said was unachievable, costly, and designed to incentivize purchases of expensive electric vehicles.

President Trump makes announcement on fuel economy standards in the Oval Office.
President Trump announces fuel economy standards in the Oval Office, Dec. 3, 2025. Official White House photo by Molly Riley.

Last December, President Donald Trump reset the CAFE standards, calling the Biden-era regulations “ridiculously burdensome” and “horrible.”

Congress created the CAFE program to limit fuel consumption during the 1970s oil crisis, when Arab nations implemented an oil embargo against the United States and other nations that had supported Israel militarily.

The United States has since shed its dependence on Arab oil, but the CAFE program has persisted and been reimagined as a tool to achieve the left’s environmental goals.

While advocates argue the program saves consumers money in the long run by decreasing their spending on fuel, an increase in CAFE standards of just one mile per gallon costs consumers an estimated $24.1 billion and automakers an estimated $5.5 billion over 10 years, even when accounting for fuel spending, according to a 2022 report from the right-leaning Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

That’s because higher [fuel economy standards increase] compliance costs, which automakers then pass on to buyers.

The CAFE program included fines for automakers that failed to comply with increasing standards. Trump’s 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill removed such fines altogether.

Crapo’s legislation represents a remarkable move to reduce consumer costs and roll back a program that has become a central pillar in Democrats’ and activists’ climate agenda. It will therefore likely garner significant pushback from supporters of the program who say it acts as a “cure for pollution.”

“It hasn’t meaningfully insulated Americans from volatility in global markets,” Crapo said in an interview with the Free Beacon. “The oil embargo has ended, but the consistent federal regulatory pressure on the auto industry has continued and increased, which is driving up the cost of automobiles, driving down the choice of options in automobiles, and is not saving any dollars significantly to consumers.”

Crapo added that the program’s higher costs and its potential to be weaponized as a climate program were the driving factors behind his decision to move forward with the bill.

According to Federal Reserve data, following the introduction of CAFE standards in 1975, the average price of new cars rapidly increased.

In 1975, the average price of a new car was $4,961, according to data tracked by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, equivalent to roughly $31,799 in 2026 after accounting for inflation. The average price of a new car, however, sits at about $49,758.


Top: Photo by Grace Dadson on Unsplash

Read more at Free Beacon

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 3

  1. Graham McDonald says:
    1 month ago

    It was some years back when a suggestion came up on a ‘political’ web site. Twenty years after a Bill has been passed and implemented it should be reviewed. Has it achieved what it was intended to do? Does it need to remain in force? Has it been misused and applied to something it was never intended for? Circumstances change.

    In short – if it’s no longer fit for purpose – trash-can it.

    Reply
  2. Richard Greene says:
    1 month ago

    To entirely end the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, Congress must amend or repeal the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975.

    This law is codified under Chapter 329 of Title 49 of the United States Code.Permanently removing this framework from the books completely requires passing a new piece of legislation, which standardly demands a 60-vote threshold in the Senate to overcome a filibuster

    Reply
    • Steve Bunten says:
      1 month ago

      You may not quite understand how legislation works but a bill doesn’t have to rescind an existing bill but can modify portions of it if it is duly passed by congress. That has happened many times. And I do hope they can because the CAFE was bullshit which has caused havoc in both the automobile industry as well as in out pocketbooks. And under Biden it would have destroyed both.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • California highway vehiclesJudge Blocks Trump EPA’s Bid To Undo California’s Costly Emissions Rules
    Sep 4, 2026
    California clean air laws remain intact after a federal judge blocked the Trump EPA’s effort to repeal the state’s special emissions waivers. […]
  • Deadly Nepal landslides leave homes buried in mud and debris.CNN Pivots From Climate Change To Trump Over Nepal’s Deadly Landslides
    Sep 4, 2026
    CNN shifts its Nepal landslide coverage to blame Trump, citing USAID cuts that the network admits wouldn’t have prevented the disaster. […]
  • chinese sardine fishingFortune’s Fishy Tale: Why Climate Change Isn’t Killing The World’s Sardines
    Sep 4, 2026
    Fortune blames climate change for declining sardine catches, while natural cycles, shifting ocean temperatures, and rampant overfishing tell another story. […]
  • antarctic penguinAntarctic Ice Melt Added Less Than A Centimeter To Sea Levels Over Nearly 30 Years, Study Shows
    Sep 3, 2026
    Antarctic ice melt added less than a centimeter to sea levels over nearly 30 years, as surface mass increased and glacier elevations stayed stable. […]
  • National Climate Assessment’s implausible emissions scenarios get a reality check as the Trump administration embraces gold-standard science.National Climate Assessment Gets Reality Check Over ‘Implausible’ Emissions Scenarios
    Sep 3, 2026
    A proposed National Climate Assessment amendment rejects extreme emissions scenarios once treated as realistic guides for federal policymaking. […]
  • josh shapiroFailed Green Schemes And Hidden Charges Fleecing Pennsylvania Ratepayers
    Sep 3, 2026
    Pennsylvania electricity customers are paying hidden green mandates that drive up bills while delivering limited benefits to ratepayers. […]
  • A California mechanic swaps in a new and more costly replacement tire.California’s Insane Plan To Regulate Replacement Tires Is Full Of Hot Air
    Sep 3, 2026
    California’s replacement tire rules promise modest fuel savings, but critics warn the mandate could raise costs and sharply limit consumer choice. […]
  • protest stop global warming UN moneyU.N. Says Global Warming Can’t Be Stopped—Still Wants $1.3 Trillion A Year
    Sep 2, 2026
    The U.N. says the 1.5°C warming threshold can no longer be avoided, yet its green climate fund demands still call for $1.3 trillion a year. […]
  • coral reefNY Times’ Coral Climate Doom Collides With Resilient, Recovering Reefs
    Sep 2, 2026
    The NY Times warns climate change threatens coral reefs, but evidence of recovering reefs and adapting corals complicates its climate-doom narrative. […]
  • us nuclear power plantWhy America’s AI Boom Needs A Nuclear Power Revival
    Sep 2, 2026
    America’s AI boom is straining the grid, making nuclear power in America increasingly vital for reliable electricity and industrial growth. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky