A federal judge overseeing a lawsuit dismissed a core section plaintiffs brought in the case — oil companies conspired to cover up global warming science.
San Francisco and Oakland filed suit against five major companies, including Exxon and Chevron, demanding money for damages global warming allegedly caused.
A core component of their suit is fossil fuel companies “engaged in a large-scale, sophisticated advertising and public relations campaign” to promote fossil fuels while they “knew” their products would contribute to “dangerous global warming.”
The cities’ suits against oil companies, however, do not show an industry conspiracy to suppress climate science from the public, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said, according to journalists who attended the hearing.
Alsup said plaintiffs “shows nothing of the sort” regarding some sort of conspiracy against science, Conservative journalist Phelim McAleer tweeted.
Judge slams California cities lawyers says they misled the court – says document they claim “shows conspiracy” shows nothing of the sort #climatechange tutorial @ClimateDepot
— Phelim McAleer (@PhelimMcAleer) March 21, 2018
In stunning end to #clmatechange trial tutorial judge dismisses claim that companies knew but conspired to suppress climate change science @climatedepot
— Phelim McAleer (@PhelimMcAleer) March 21, 2018
“Alsup dismissing the idea that there was some sort of conspiracy,” environmental journalist Amy Westervelt tweeted.
Alsup dismissing the idea that there was some sort of conspiracy amongst fossil fuel companies to suppress info on climate. Exxon discovery files tell a different story. #climatetutorial @ClimateLawNews
— Amy Westervelt (@amywestervelt) March 21, 2018
Cities and oil companies gave Alsup a five hour tutorial on global warming Wednesday, answering eight questions the California judge had given both parties ahead of time. A group of scientists skeptical of man-made warming also submitted briefs for the hearing.
Eight California localities and New York City have filed suit against fossil fuel companies, arguing they should pay for the damages global warming allegedly wrought. New York City’s lawsuit seeks up to $20 billion in compensation, much of which would go toward trial lawyers.
However, all the cities claim fossil fuel companies conspired to suppress global warming science. The claim is largely based on reporting from liberal journalists at InsideClimate News and Columbia University.
Read more at Daily Caller
This id Good News indeed we all know what its realy about Greedy city officials want to line their pockets with little ill gotten cash and force America back to the junk science Paris Accord
The oil companies successfully defended themselves against the conspiracy charge. However, they chose to endorse the AGW consensus . Shades of Rex Tillerson, taking the easy route. Big Oil doesn’t care about carbon taxes because they’ll be borne by the consumer. Big Oil is in bed with Big Government .
Again, the cities are assuming the “settled science”. The fact is man made global warming doesn’t exist and there is no increase in the extreme weather events that the cities are seeking compensation for.
However, the above was not what the ruling was about. It was about a conspiracy of the oil companies. The ones doing the real conspiracy to hide science is the environmentalists. Historical data has been altered to support the cause. For current data most of the weather stations in rural and higher altitude locations have been removed so only the warmer ones are reporting data. One author on this web site even discovered NOAA changing the values of weather stations to higher values. The real science does not support the climate change movement.