• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Climate Expert Breaks Down U.S. Tornado Damage And Frequency Trends Through 2025

Data shows no increase in normalized losses or major tornado incidence.

by Roger Pielke Jr
April 20, 2026, 7:39 AM
in Extreme Weather, Money & Finance, News and Opinion, Science
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

tornado small town
Through yesterday, according to preliminary data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Storm Prediction Center (SPC), the U.S. has experienced 365 tornadoes, just four above the longer-term average to date. Last year, more than 1,900 tornadoes were observed, the most since 2011, and well above the longer-term average. [some emphasis, links added]

Today, I share the latest data on normalized U.S. tornado losses since 1954 and a time series of the incidence of the strongest tornadoes since 1975. I doubt you’ll come across this data anywhere else.

Comparing tornado losses across decades is not straightforward.

A tornado striking what was a rural county 70 years ago would cause far less damage than the same tornado striking that same heavily developed county today — because there is now more property and wealth exposed to loss.

To make meaningful historical comparisons of loss estimates, researchers “normalize” losses: they ask what each historical storm or event would cost if it occurred under today’s societal conditions, adjusting for factors such as inflation, wealth, building types and counts, population, and, in some cases, efforts to improve building quality.

This approach was first applied systematically to tornadoes by Simmons, Sutter & Pielke Jr. (2013), who analyzed NOAA SPC data from 1950 through 2011. Zhang et al. (2023) reproduced and extended the Simmons series through 2018, confirming the earlier results and updating the time series.

They concluded: “[O]ur results suggest a downward trend in tornado losses for the U.S. as a nation.”

The figure below shows my replication of the Zhang et al. tornado normalization from primary data and extends it through 2025. The normalized losses are expressed in 2026 dollars.


The dominant loss years are 1954 ($36 billion),1965 ($44 billion), and 1974 ($29 billion). The largest recent loss year is 2011 at $16 billion — the largest post-1980 value and the only recent year approaching the scale of the 1960s–1970s peaks. Since 2012, annual normalized losses have largely remained below $5 billion.

The time series shows a significant decrease in annual normalized losses. The 1954–1963 decade averaged $4.8 billion per year; the 2015–2025 decade averaged $1.9 billion per year.

Our 2013 paper identified this trend:

“We can definitively state that there is no evidence of increasing normalized tornado damage or incidence on climatic time scales.”

At the time, we hypothesized that the decrease may be due to an actual reduction in severe tornado incidence.

However, because economic data should not be used to infer trends in related climate variables, we suggested that any such trend in tornadoes would depend upon analyses of climate data.

More than a decade later, tornado data is strongly suggestive of an overall decline in the incidence of the strongest tornadoes.

The figure below shows the annual count of F3/EF3 and stronger tornadoes from 1975 through 2024, the period with the most consistent data quality.


The time series shows a clear decrease in major tornado incidence. The 1975–1984 decade averaged 49 F/EF3+ tornadoes per year; the 2015–2024 decade averaged 26 per year — a decline of roughly 46 percent.

Note that data available back to 1954 makes this decrease look much larger, but it is accompanied by questions of data quality.

The interpretation of this declining trend requires caution for several reasons. First, the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale, introduced in 2007, changed rating methodology, creating a potential discontinuity in the series.

Most analysts believe EF ratings are somewhat more conservative than legacy F ratings for comparable damage, which could contribute to the apparent post-2007 decline.

Second, improved public warnings and storm-resistant construction may have contributed to changing the nature of observable damage markers that drive intensity ratings, which are often established based on damage patterns rather than direct measurements of tornado intensity.

Neither of these caveats undermines the fact that there is no evidence of an increase in violent tornado incidence over the observational record.

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report concluded with low confidence in the detection of any trend in tornado frequency or intensity at the global or regional level, and with low confidence in attribution of any observed changes to anthropogenic forcing.

The data reviewed here are consistent with that assessment.


The Honest Broker is written by climate expert Roger Pielke Jr and is reader-supported. If you value what you have read here, please consider subscribing and supporting the work that goes into it.

Read rest at The Honest Broker

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • noaa hurricane news coverageMedia Pushes ‘Catastrophic Climate’ Narrative Despite IPCC’s Extreme Weather Findings
    Aug 31, 2026
    As climate change coverage declines, some media outlets still link worsening extreme weather to global warming despite the IPCC’s findings. […]
  • cartoon thunberg podium how dare you‘How Dare You?’ The Human Cost Of Greta Thunberg’s Climate-Policy Crusade
    Aug 31, 2026
    Greta Thunberg’s “How dare you?” comes full circle as costly climate policies undermine energy security, living standards and prosperity worldwide. […]
  • polar bear sea iceLate-Summer Arctic Sea Ice Extent Hasn’t Fallen In 20 Years, Satellite Data Show
    Aug 31, 2026
    Late-summer Arctic sea ice extent has barely changed in 20 years, as Europe sees low burned area and Atlantic cyclone activity remains well below normal. […]
  • chinese industrial parkWorld’s Worst Polluter China Mulls Hosting U.N. Climate Alarmist Summit COP33
    Aug 28, 2026
    China is reportedly considering a COP33 bid as the world’s largest carbon emitter seeks to burnish its reputation as a global climate leader. […]
  • nj industrial workersNJ’s $50B Climate Superfund Bill Faces Fresh Pushback From Business, Labor
    Aug 28, 2026
    NJ’s $50B climate superfund bill is drawing renewed opposition over warnings it could raise energy costs, threaten jobs, and deter investment. […]
  • french vineyard grapesAn Early Champagne Harvest Isn’t Proof Of Climate Change—Just Warm Weather
    Aug 28, 2026
    Reuters blames climate change for an early Champagne grape harvest, but unusually warm weather—not a long-term climate trend—offers a simpler explanation. […]
  • latin america oil gas extractionLatin America Returns To Oil And Gas As ‘Green’ Shackles Break
    Aug 28, 2026
    Latin America is reclaiming its energy resources as governments expand oil and gas development and abandon costly climate-driven restrictions. […]
  • nasem buildingState AGs Accuse NASEM Of Producing ‘Biased’ Report To Aid Climate Lawfare
    Aug 27, 2026
    State AGs allege a NASEM biased climate report was shaped by funders and advocates tied to climate litigation and designed to aid plaintiffs. […]
  • puppet media moneyFair Question: Who’s Really Paying For The Media’s Climate Reporting?
    Aug 27, 2026
    Green-advocacy groups are pouring millions into climate reporting grants, raising questions about media bias and claims of editorial independence. […]
  • wildfire calif power linesNewsom’s Wildfire Liability Plan Puts Utilities, Victims On A Collision Course
    Aug 27, 2026
    Newsom wants to rewrite California’s wildfire liability rules, pitting utility costs against compensation for victims when power equipment sparks fires. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky