• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Energy Experts Say Kamala’s Energy Plan Is ‘Gibberish Designed To Muddy A Record’

by Nick Pope
September 10, 2024, 10:15 AM
in Energy, News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
4

kamala puerto rico solar

The Harris campaign unveiled an explanation of her positions on energy issues on Monday, and the euphemistic language used signals that she has not truly moderated her views, according to energy experts who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation. [emphasis, links added]

After Vice President Kamala Harris and her team mostly avoided divulging specifics about her policy stances for weeks, the campaign’s website debuted an “issues” page the day before the only scheduled debate of the 2024 presidential race.

The energy section of her “issues” page does not include a single specific policy position and instead features a heavy dose of vague, euphemistic language meant to disguise her views on energy and environmental issues as more moderate than they truly are, energy experts told the DCNF.

The campaign’s explanation of Harris’s energy views is “the sort of political gibberish designed to muddy a record,” Dan Kish, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Energy Research, told the DCNF.

“Instead of trying to please everyone by being obtuse, she should just level with voters about her record, and hers is a record of making energy more expensive, less reliable and pushing to ban the kinds of energy we use the most because it meets people’s needs and family budgets.

“Her energy plan isn’t working in Europe, California, or anywhere else it’s being pushed by politicians, no matter what she says.”

Click to enlarge

In a section of her issues page describing her plans to “Lower Energy Costs and Tackle The Climate Crisis,” the campaign states that Harris wants to “unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis” while building upon President Joe Biden’s energy agenda.

“As Attorney General, Kamala Harris won tens of millions in settlements against Big Oil and held polluters accountable. As Vice President, she cast the tie-breaking vote to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in climate action in history,” the website reads. “This historic work is lowering household energy costs, creating hundreds of thousands of high-quality clean energy jobs, and building a thriving clean energy economy, all while ensuring America’s energy security and independence with record energy production.”

The issue of fracking is notably absent from the Harris campaign’s section on energy.

“As President, she will unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis as she builds on this historic work, advances environmental justice, protects public lands and public health, increases resilience to climate disasters, lowers household energy costs, creates millions of new jobs, and continues to hold polluters accountable to secure clean air and water for all,” the website continues.

“As the Vice President said at the international climate conference, COP28, she knows that meeting this global challenge will require global cooperation and she is committed to continuing and building upon the United States’ international climate leadership. She and Governor Walz will always fight for the freedom to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.”

The issue of fracking is notably absent from the Harris campaign’s section on energy. Harris endorsed a fracking ban in 2019 while running for president for the first time, and she told CNN host Dana Bash that she no longer wants to outlaw the technique during her first and only sit-down interview to date since becoming the de facto Democratic nominee in late July.

“I think it really goes to the first thing she says there, that ‘this historic work is lowering household energy costs.’ There is no example anywhere of anything in the Inflation Reduction Act reducing any costs anywhere,” Steve Milloy, a senior legal fellow at the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute, told the DCNF.

“Wind and solar don’t lower electricity costs. They have only raised electricity costs, and that’s just a [historical] fact … where is her position on fracking? Because it’s not in here.”

Other specific left-wing positions she has taken [concerning] environmental and energy issues before her second run for the Oval Office include: co-sponsoring the Green New Deal as a senator, calling for the abolition of plastic straws, suggesting she’s open to adjusting dietary guidelines to try to get Americans to eat less red meat, and supporting a carbon tax.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 4

  1. Boxorox says:
    2 years ago

    I will never be a member of this fantasy United America that expects to tackle the imaginary climate crisis. There is a definite limit to how much fictitious reality the authorities can create by endlessly repeating things that are completely untrue.

    Reply
  2. Sonnyhill says:
    2 years ago

    In the old days farmers would “fix” a chicken-killing dog by tying the carcass tight to its neck. The stench was the cure. Kamala will wear this smelly LIE to her defeat. American care about personal prosperity. They do not hate fossil fuels, the majority understand their utility.

    Reply
  3. Sonnyhill says:
    2 years ago

    “Vague, euphemistic language” ? Crunk!
    An amalgam of crazy-drunk, from African-American vernacular.

    Reply
  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    Harris is going to try to turn Water into Wine and make the Sun Stand still just as iditoc as Gates and Blocking the Sun or ships pulled by Giant Kites

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Subscribe To CCD Via Email!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get instant notifications. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • chinese industrial parkWorld’s Worst Polluter China Mulls Hosting U.N. Climate Alarmist Summit COP33
    Aug 28, 2026
    China is reportedly considering a COP33 bid as the world’s largest carbon emitter seeks to burnish its reputation as a global climate leader. […]
  • nj industrial workersNJ’s $50B Climate Superfund Bill Faces Fresh Pushback From Business, Labor
    Aug 28, 2026
    NJ’s $50B climate superfund bill is drawing renewed opposition over warnings it could raise energy costs, threaten jobs, and deter investment. […]
  • french vineyard grapesAn Early Champagne Harvest Isn’t Proof Of Climate Change—Just Warm Weather
    Aug 28, 2026
    Reuters blames climate change for an early Champagne grape harvest, but unusually warm weather—not a long-term climate trend—offers a simpler explanation. […]
  • latin america oil gas extractionLatin America Returns To Oil And Gas As ‘Green’ Shackles Break
    Aug 28, 2026
    Latin America is reclaiming its energy resources as governments expand oil and gas development and abandon costly climate-driven restrictions. […]
  • nasem buildingState AGs Accuse NASEM Of Producing ‘Biased’ Report To Aid Climate Lawfare
    Aug 27, 2026
    State AGs allege a NASEM biased climate report was shaped by funders and advocates tied to climate litigation and designed to aid plaintiffs. […]
  • puppet media moneyFair Question: Who’s Really Paying For The Media’s Climate Reporting?
    Aug 27, 2026
    Green-advocacy groups are pouring millions into climate reporting grants, raising questions about media bias and claims of editorial independence. […]
  • wildfire calif power linesNewsom’s Wildfire Liability Plan Puts Utilities, Victims On A Collision Course
    Aug 27, 2026
    Newsom wants to rewrite California’s wildfire liability rules, pitting utility costs against compensation for victims when power equipment sparks fires. […]
  • flat tire califCalifornia’s New Efficiency Standards Make Replacement Tires A Luxury Item
    Aug 27, 2026
    The new California tire efficiency standards could sharply raise replacement costs while eliminating much of today’s tire market. […]
  • super el nino balloonDeutsche Welle’s ‘Super El Niño’ Climate Scare Is Mostly Hot Air
    Aug 26, 2026
    A strong El Niño may affect global weather, but that doesn’t mean climate change is fueling another worldwide extreme-weather crisis. […]
  • nancy pelosiPelosi Family Bets Millions On Company Poised To Cash In On AI Power Crunch
    Aug 26, 2026
    Nancy Pelosi's husband invested millions in Bloom Energy, a fuel-cell company positioned to profit from AI’s soaring electricity demand. […]

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Sunset on Net Zero

Canary in a Climate World

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky