A recent TIME magazine article says human-caused climate change is increasing the severity and number of droughts around the world.
These claims are false.
Drought-tracking data show no meaningful trend in the severity or frequency of droughts globally. [bold, links added]
Referencing a recent United Nations report, TIME’s article “Climate Change Will Make Droughts Longer, More Common, Says UN” says:
“[t]he frequency and duration of droughts will continue to increase due to human-caused climate change, with water scarcity already affecting billions of people across the world.”
This statement contradicts previous UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, and is refuted by real-world data.
As noted in Climate at a Glance: Drought, the United Nations reports only “low confidence” that there will be negative, that is decreasing, precipitation trends worldwide.
Regarding water scarcity, the UN remarks that there is actually “high confidence” in a trend of increasing precipitation over at least the mid-latitudes of the Earth.
In a Climate Realism post about the UN’s handling of water issues, James Taylor writes:
“The United Nations collects over $50 billion in annual revenue. Yet, core humanitarian programs go unfunded.
“For example, the UN announced in August 2019 that it closed down several humanitarian programs in Yemen – including clean water programs – due to unavailable funds.”
Although to the media a drought is a drought, in its 2021 Sixth Assessment Report, the IPCC distinguishes four categories of drought: hydrological, meteorological, ecological, and agricultural.
According to the IPCC, there is limited evidence that climate change has increased the number, duration, or intensity of hydrological or meteorological droughts, and it has only medium confidence it has “contributed to changes in agricultural and ecological droughts and has led to an increase in the overall affected land area.”
Even for ecological and agricultural droughts, the data is a mixed bag. The IPCC divides the world into 47 separate regions of study when analyzing drought trends, and its data suggest ecological and agricultural drought may have increased during the period of modest warming in 12 of those 47 regions.
However, in only two of those regions does the IPCC have even “medium confidence” for any human role in the observed increase.
For the remaining regions experiencing a possible increase in droughts, the IPCC has low confidence human activities have had any discernible impact.
As written before in Climate Realism here, here, and here, droughts around the world are weather events that may last a few years, but are not unprecedented in Earth’s history, even in regions not usually associated with it like Europe.
Rather than looking at peer-reviewed research and real-world data, TIME discusses a series of anecdotes to support the claim of global warming-induced worsening droughts.
TIME cites African villagers suffering under drought, one of whose “crops have been without rain for over a year.”
Next, the magazine jumps to a discussion of the Amazon rainforest, claiming it is suffering substantial drought due to climate change, writing:
“’[t]he same is true for the Amazon,’ the U.N. said, with three droughts occurring since the turn of the century and triggering forest fires, with climate change and deforestation also to blame.”
Droughts are not uncommon in many regions of Africa, and as explored in Climate Realism here, for example, the present drought is not historically unusual.
Also, as covered in Climate Realism, here, many African nations suffer from the corruption of local dictatorships, terrible mismanagement of their land, and war that compound the negative effects of extreme weather events, including the drought currently plaguing parts of the continent.
Although TIME acknowledges deforestation is a factor in the localized Amazonian drought, it fails to understand how localized it is, and why that is the case.
As a previous Climate Realism post discussing drought in the Amazon explains, drier than normal conditions are affecting most of the Amazon. The only regions that currently suffer drought are those where deforestation has occurred.
From the post:
“Because internal conditions in the Amazon help produce its own climate conditions, including its persistent rainfall, only areas that have been denuded have experienced declining rainfall.
“Unfortunately, those areas no longer have the jungle cover to absorb and mitigate the rainfall, so when rains occur, flooding is more frequent.
Even with that factored in, recent data shows rainfall has actually increased during the wet season for large portions of the Amazon basin.”
TIME’s narrative may advance the UN’s money-hungry agenda, but it doesn’t advance the truth.
Rather than conducting independent research to confirm whether the UN’s claims were true, it simply parroted the organization’s claims.
Citing heartstring-tugging anecdotal stories about tragedies in the aftermath of extreme weather events like drought may sell copy and persuade their target audience, but it does nothing to further knowledge or to promote wise policymaking.
Read more at Climate Realism
This is the very same liberal rag that was giving Global Cooling and New Ice Age back in the 1970’s and whats worst is they sell a Child’s Issue of their leftists rag Time for Kids to hook them into subscribing to their leftists rag when their adults
This same liberal rag was gong on aabbout Global Cooling and New I
Who reads Time magazine ?
Does anyone subscribe to Time magazine ?
Does anyone carte to read Time magazine ?
Obviously when they say climate change they mean MAN MADE GLOBAL CHANGE?.. and since there is no Man made global climate change it indicates that man made global change is not causing droughts or floods…. But who would read a magazine article that stated that there is nothing to worry about because whatever droughts and floods are happening are globally at least out of our control.??
why should anyone want t o beleive this liberal rag Time in the first place they have lied about Evolution and Support Gun Control and named Hitler their 1938 Person of the Year and have come up with the all time worst front covers of the notorious liberal rag