Sen. Ted. Cruz, R-Texas led a coalition of 12 other Republicans on Monday, writing to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to express concern over a recent climate rule that could impact the agency’s mission.
In the letter, Cruz — the ranking member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee — and all other committee Republicans demanded that NASA Administrator Bill Nelson abandon the rule that was proposed in November and requires federal contractors to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data.
The 13 GOP lawmakers said the regulation was not based on science and would lead to political favoritism.
“Congress never granted NASA or the other partnering agencies the statutory authority to set the GHG emission standards for themselves or their contractors,” Cruz and the other committee Republicans wrote.
“As for the environmental benefits, the proposed rule admits they would be hard to even quantify and that ‘increased public transparency and accountability may prompt suppliers to take action following a ‘what gets measured gets managed’ mantra.’”
The letter argued the “highly politicized regulation” would divert the agency’s attention away from its stated mission to “explore the unknown in air and space, innovate for the benefit of humanity, and inspire the world through discovery.”
On Nov. 14, NASA issued the proposed rule alongside the Department of Defense (DOD) and General Services Administration (GSA).
In addition to the GHG disclosure requirement, federal contractors would be required to disclose climate-related financial “risk” and to establish “science-based” GHG emission reduction targets.
The rule came days after President Biden announced it during the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Egypt.
The White House said the rule was part of Biden’s “leadership to implement the first comprehensive, government-wide strategy to measure, disclose, manage, and mitigate the systemic risks that climate change poses to American families.”
However, Commerce Committee Republicans said the rule was unnecessary and would increase costs.
“The regulation is estimated to increase total costs among federal agencies and contractors by almost $4 billion,” the Republicans’ letter to Nelson continued.
“If NASA does not need any of these funds to fulfill its mission, then those resources should be returned to the Treasury.”
“The costs to individual contractors, many of which are small businesses, would equal hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars upfront and annually thereafter. Smaller firms with limited streams of resources compared to larger companies may have to either exit the government contracting market or consolidate with other entities.”
Cruz and the other Republicans added that the rule would decrease competition among contractors that they warned is “a major problem already facing federal contracting.”
The lawmakers also expressed concern that the rule defers judgment on standards to the Science-Based Targets Initiative, an international climate-focused organization.
They said the group has yet to publish new GHG emission guidance for the fossil fuel and mining industries, “making it impossible to be in compliance.”
The NASA, DOD, and GSA regulation also exempts tribes, non-profit organizations, universities, state, and local governments, which the Republicans wrote made it appear that the Biden administration was less concerned about science and more concerned with political favoritism toward special interest groups.
“In addition to enriching the politically left-aligned consultants that will supposedly track a company’s impact on GHG emissions, there is no practical way to verify or audit the validity of these disclosures,” the letter concluded.
Read rest at Fox News
This is another clear cut case of over reach. There is no law giving federal agencies the authority to demand emission data from contractors.
From the article, “the rule defers judgment on standards to the Science-Based Targets Initiative, an international climate-focused organization.” If memory serves me correctly, it is illegal defer control of US government functions to international agencies.
From the article, “there is no practical way to verify or audit the validity of these disclosures.” What we will certainly see is a lot of creative accounting to get results that don’t match reality.
It was that James Hansan who got NASA caught up in this Climate Change/Global Warmings load of malarkey