• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Crazy Kamala: W. Virginia Will See Jobs By ‘Reclaiming Abandoned Land Mines’

by Mica Soellner
3 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
4

kamala interviewVice President Kamala Harris spoke of “abandoned land mines” in West Virginia when talking about job creation.

During a local interview with WSAZ 3, the vice president correlated the administration’s push for clean energy with the creation of new jobs.

“All of those skilled workers who are in the coal industry and transferring those skills to what we need to do in terms of reclaiming abandoned land mines,” Harris said.

“What we need to do around plugging leaks from oil and gas wells, and transferring those important skills to the work that has yet to be done, and needs to get done.”

While land mines typically refer to underground explosives, Harris’s gaffe was most likely referring to abandoned coal or strip mines.

.@KamalaHarris says there will be job creation around “reclaiming abandoned land mines” in West Virginia.

“All of those skilled workers who are in the coal industry and transferring those skills to what we need to do in terms of dealing with reclaiming abandoned land mines.” pic.twitter.com/xnXP3ra8bN

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) January 31, 2021

The Washington Examiner reached out to the White House for clarification but did not receive an immediate response.

West Virginia, a state heavily reliant on the coal industry, would be one that could be affected by the Biden administration’s push to move out of the fossil fuel industries.

President Biden has already taken steps to prioritize the threat of climate change as one of his top issues. On his first day in office, Biden reenlisted the United States in the Paris climate accord.

Last week, the president signed a number of executive orders related to climate concerns, including a ban on some energy drilling and a freeze on new oil and gas leases on public lands. Climate Envoy John Kerry reiterated claims that the administration is seeking to replace any potentially lost jobs with a new, green economy.

West Virginia lawmakers had mixed reactions to Biden’s climate plan and how it would affect workers in their state.

Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin applauded the investment into his state but said he plans to hold the administration accountable in that the burden of accelerated changes is not “unduly placed on these communities.”

Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito argued that the country’s energy sector produces high-paying jobs, and the Biden administration was going “backward” on energy.

“In West Virginia, we remember the effects of this playbook originally created during the Obama administration,” Capito told West Virginia MetroNews.

“America is a proud energy producer, and paralyzing an entire industry full of high-paying jobs and propping up hostile countries with fewer environmental regulations does little to combat global climate change and creates resentment at home.”

Biden vowed the administration would do due diligence to rebuild communities that may be at the center of the shift toward clean energy.

Read rest at Washington Examiner

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Sen. Manchin Lashes Out After Kamala's WV Interview: 'I Couldn't Believe It'

Comments 4

  1. Charles Higley says:
    3 years ago

    VP Kamala is talking about either government-paid jobs or jobs paid for by extracting money from the former or current mine owners. If the reclamation is government run, you KNOW it will be done poorly and inefficiently. Either way, she wants to produce jobs that really produce nothing but gets more dependent on handouts by gov’t. Mines already are regulated to do reclamation, or does she not know that?

  2. Randy M Verret says:
    3 years ago

    I have a constructive suggestion. Folks in the Biden Administration need to spend a couple hours on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) website. This is the segment of the Dept. of Energy that compiles statistics and uses available data to make projections. If you understand that fossil fuels provide EIGHTY percent of your nations primary energy and they are currently forecast with present known technologies to provide over SIXTY percent in 2050, you might think they’d PAUSE on their ongoing predispositions and consequent policy initiatives. There is a HUGE disconnect regarding thoughtful & informed debate on the energy transition vs. the “mantra” being espoused by the White House. If you look at the best science available at reputable sources like EIA, it is incongruent with the current energy strategy being put forward. That is being diplomatic…

  3. Randy M Verret says:
    3 years ago

    BTW: As far as the VP’s reference to “orphaned” oil & gas wells, just about every producing State already has a plugging contingency fund. Like mine reclamation, it is well established process that has long been underway. LOTS of work to do, but if you want it done timely. efficiently & cost effectively you are (probably) better served keeping the federal government OUT of that process…

  4. Brian James says:
    3 years ago

    November 4, 2020 Wind and solar energy are ruining the planet

    This is a get rich quick scheme for the utilities and their investors and a disaster for ratepayers, the people, and the environment. Rates are skyrocketing wherever industrial wind and solar build-out have occurred.

    https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2020/11/04/wind-and-solar-energy-are-ruining-the-planet/

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • biden evElectric Vehicle Adoption Stalls Out As Americans Snub The Pricey Cars
    Jul 8, 2024
    The road to widespread EV adoption is proving to be bumpy, with several obstacles threatening to stall progress. […]
  • severe weatherThe Media’s Relentless Climate-Fueled Extreme-Weather Nonsense—Part 2
    Jul 8, 2024
    A seemingly plausible-sounding storyline for any extreme weather event is easy to create. But a storyline is a story, not science. […]
  • Pacific hurricaneUnseen Calm In The North Pacific: Historic Storm-Free Period Since June 1
    Jul 8, 2024
    The lack of named storms in the North Pacific since June 1, 2024, marks a significant meteorological event being ignored by the MSM. […]
  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]
  • bavaria germanyJune 2024 German Weather Was Close To Normal, No ‘Hellish Summer’ In Sight
    Jul 3, 2024
    June in the Central European region was highly variable with periods of both cool and summery weather. In other words, no hellish summer in sight. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch