• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Conservatives Propose Pro-Fossil Fuel Member For Exxon Board In ESG Pushback

by Fred Lucas
2 years ago
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
1

exxon mobil signA conservative corporate watchdog group is promoting a pro-fossil fuel scientist and lawyer to serve on the board of Exxon Mobil Corp., attempting to push back against the growing ESG movement.

The National Legal and Policy Center recommended Don van der Vaart, currently a North Carolina judge and former secretary of the state’s Department of Environmental Quality, to serve on the board, as this month, a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule makes it easier for shareholders to recommend board members. [bold, links added]

Last year, progressive investment fund Engine No. 1 proposed a competing set of recommendations for Exxon Mobil’s board, and three of its four choices won approval to be board members.

This was a victory for the ESG movement, which stands for environment, social, and governance. In this case, governance would be members of the governing board.

“Engine No. 1 got three of their nominees on the board. Conservatives see that as kind of an insurgency by the pro-ESG folks to try to turn Exxon away from its core competencies and address their climate agenda,” said Paul Chesser, director of the corporate integrity project for the National Legal and Policy Center, which owns shares in dozens of companies and has frequently submitted shareholder resolutions.

The new SEC rule that took effect on Sept. 1 makes it easier for shareholders to nominate board members on proxy cards, potentially allowing a slate of candidates in competition with a company’s recommended candidates.

Chesser says in this case, the NLPC seeks to have van der Vaart placed on the proxy card with the endorsement of Exxon’s board of directors.

Chesser wrote the recommendation letter for van der Vaart in mid-August to the energy giant’s three-member Board Affairs Committee.

It’s up to the committee whether to send the recommendation to the full board of directors for consideration at the 2023 annual shareholder meeting.

“We’re serious about it. If we couldn’t have found a good recommendation, we wouldn’t have done it,” Chesser told Fox News Digital. “How Exxon receives it and how they process it, we don’t know. Just through the little bit of communications we’ve had with the company, we get the sense that they are taking it seriously and we are encouraged by that.”

Exxon Mobil did not respond to FOX Business’ request for comment on this story. …snip…

According to the letter of recommendation from the NLPC, he is willing to serve on the board if elected. He was also previously North Carolina’s energy policy director and served on the EPA’s Scientific Advisory Board.

“I can say that not only do ESG strategies deviate from ones based on purely fiduciary responsibilities, [but the arbiters of ESG strategies are also] often overly simplistic in their understanding of the science,” van der Vaart told Fox News Digital in an email.

“An example is the terrible environmental and social costs of electric vehicles – and yet the ESG ‘judges’ demand investment in electrification of our transportation sector.”

Van der Vaart has previously noted that plug-in electric vehicles will require more natural gas combustion, which he has argued could lead to more greenhouse gases.

Large corporations such as Disney, Coca-Cola, and others have dived into political controversies in recent years. Chesser noted even the industry group the American Petroleum Institute advocates for a carbon tax that would harm the customers of energy companies.

Chesser said the NLPC is not trying to turn corporations into conservative activists.

“As conservatives get involved in shareholder activism, we are trying to shift the whole corporate world to primarily caring about their fiduciary responsibilities over political agendas,” Chesser said.

“We don’t want to shift companies to be conservative activists. We just want them to have fealty to the broadest number of shareholders as possible.”

h/t RO

Read rest at Fox Business

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

BlackRock, Citi CEOs Blowing Off Key Climate Talk In Egypt

Comments 1

  1. Randy Verret says:
    2 years ago

    OK, so what exactly is an “activist?” What unique qualifications (i.e. tangible business experience or education) do ANY of these folks possess that QUALIFY them to do anything, let alone be an Exxon board member? I highly doubt you can find a better qualified individual than the judge from North Carolina. The REAL questions for shareholders is what are those 3 activists placed last year doing on the board to begin with? In modern times, a corporations first obligation is it’s duty to it’s shareholders along with protectng it’s “social license.” Exxon should offer NO APOLGIES for responsibly providing petroleum products that are ESSENTIAL to modern life and human flourishing that everyone needs, including their detractors! Time for common sense and sound business principles to make a RALLY….

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • bidenBiden’s Net Zero Plans Have Sent Prices Soaring. It’s Going To Get Worse
    Jul 8, 2024
    Biden’s betting big on his 'net zero' agenda as part of his misguided ideological climate-control vision, even as Americans get walloped. […]
  • biden evElectric Vehicle Adoption Stalls Out As Americans Snub The Pricey Cars
    Jul 8, 2024
    The road to widespread EV adoption is proving to be bumpy, with several obstacles threatening to stall progress. […]
  • severe weatherThe Media’s Relentless Climate-Fueled Extreme-Weather Nonsense—Part 2
    Jul 8, 2024
    A seemingly plausible-sounding storyline for any extreme weather event is easy to create. But a storyline is a story, not science. […]
  • Pacific hurricaneUnseen Calm In The North Pacific: Historic Storm-Free Period Since June 1
    Jul 8, 2024
    The lack of named storms in the North Pacific since June 1, 2024, marks a significant meteorological event being ignored by the MSM. […]
  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch