According to green activists, climate change policies don’t need to be costed because they’re a moral issue.
Do green activists have a household budget? Whether it’s their own money or that of taxpayers, there has to be fiscal responsibility.
The first moral issue is that climate activists ignore the evidence of the totality of integrated Earth systems and history.
They refuse to debate, don’t analyze data, resort to fraud, don’t consider the consequences of their policies, and don’t care about the damage their policies create.
FUTILITY
The second real moral issue is their futility trying to engineer a climate within a narrow range having no understanding of the impact to the environment to the diversity of flora and fauna and the damage of so many Western countries.
This damage is treated as mere detritus on the path to salvation.
Taxpayer-funded climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data and conclusions.
This is the seed of the whole corrupt climate change business.
Their antics are not expensive amusement but the destruction of the 2,500-year-old scientific method, which is one way of finding the truth.
Climate “scientists” remain unchallenged by a fawning, scientifically illiterate, politicized media.
For hundreds of thousands of years, humans and other organisms have adapted and flourished to great and rapid natural climate changes. Surely adaptation by an advanced technological society would be easier.
Future climate change predictions are based on computer models that have consistently failed over the past 40 years when compared with the reality of actual measurements.
The result of changing the whole energy system based on this nonsense is an energy crisis.
During the time I was writing my book Green Murder, the coal price rose 100 percent and the LNG price 500 percent. Don’t tell me that fossil fuels are on the path to extinction. They are needed for survival.
The new green religion is a doomsday cult where the naïve and gullible seek salvation through the veneration of cruciform wind turbines and “settled science” that has replaced Scripture.
Fire and brimstone preachers cancel, deplatform, and abuse those who question green dogma with all the savagery that was used by the Spanish inquisitors to root out heretics.
What is touted today as “progressive” is in reality a regressive drift back to the Dark Ages with its misery, poverty, and ignorance.
The greens are not a soft, cuddly feel-good political movement trying to make the planet a better place.
Their green propaganda appeals to many of the young and well-off.
It is a communist-inspired destructive hypocritical western movement that destroys democracy and cares not for the environment.
By their actions and consequences, greens kill people. There is nothing virtuous or admirable about being green.
STRUGGLE
Today’s green religion is like the children’s game of musical chairs, a game designed to ensure that someone always misses out.
With wind and solar electricity, someone always loses. These are the people on Struggle Street who cannot afford to pay the increasing electricity costs, especially when they face long-term unemployment as a result of COVID-19 virus lockdowns.
It is immoral, unnecessary, futile, and anti-human.
There is a move now from European socialists, the UN, and COP participants that the freedom losses experienced with COVID-19 lockdowns should be extended and that all citizens should have a climate passport where every atom of carbon used will be on a register to be monitored and taxed.
This is communism. Cui bono.
Net-zero is a mindless, meaningless slogan. It is undefined. What exactly is net-zero? What do we use? What don’t we use? Where is the due diligence?
If it means no fossil-fuel use—then we go back 200 hundred years. We’ve been there. Endless mud, dung, shortened lives, disease, no heating, no cooling, nothing of the modern world, and no hope.
Some EU leaders are telling us that in a net-zero world we will own nothing and be happy. I call this communist slavery. We’ve been there before and it all failed at great cost.
Net-zero has no costings and you can bet your bottom dollar because that’s all you’ll have left, that your money will make the green billionaires even wealthier.
Net-zero is a cooked-up recipe for economic and social chaos, class division, and further destruction of the west and its values.
INVASION
The collapse in the values of Western civilization is a far greater threat than climate change or China.
There is no need for a Chinese invasion or war, we are destroying and enslaving ourselves from within.
In just one year, parts of the West have collapsed into an energy crisis of their own making. This is a window into net-zero.
If such facts offend you, so be it. Take a daily teaspoon of cement to harden up, broaden your knowledge, reduce your biases, and challenge your thinking.
My book Green Murder contains facts underpinned by repeatable, validated evidence and the scientific method. No matter how offended you might be, feelings are not evidence.
Green activists can get away with murder because they are unchallenged. Certa Bonum Certamen [fight the good fight]. Don’t let them get away with it.
In this book, I charge the greens with murder. They murder humans who are kept in eternal poverty without coal-fired electricity.
They support slavery and the early deaths of black child miners.
They murder forests and wildlife by clear-cutting for mining and wind turbines. They murder forests and wildlife with their bushfire policies.
SUICIDE
They murder economies by producing unemployment, hopelessness, the collapse of communities, disrupted social cohesion, and suicide.
They murder free speech and freedoms, and their takeover of the education system has ended up in the murdering of the intellectual and economic future of young people.
They terrify children into mental illness with their apocalyptic death-cult lies and exaggerations.
They try to divide a nation. They are hypocrites and such angry, ignorant people should never touch other people’s money.
The greens are guilty of murder. The sentence is life with no parole in a cave in the bush enjoying ALL the benefits of net-zero.
Professor Ian Plimer’s latest book Green Murder (www.greenmurder.com) was released by Connor Court Publishing in late November 2021.
Read more at Politicom
De-industrialization, depopulation and the end of economic growth were not goals of Marx. Authenticity and historical knowledge are more important that contemporary labels.
Maybe those were not his goals, but they are definitely the result of policies he endorsed. Ignorant leftists are a dime a dozen, or cheaper. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated: but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. . . . This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be ‘cured’ against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
—C.S. Lewis
I call it mass hysteria, examples of which history is replete.
Ariane, I like to start a conversation about climate change, just to see where someone stands on the theory. If they are believers, I say bs.
That way, I don’t have have to waste my time with the simpleton ever again.
All those idiots who oppose Fracking and Drilling the keep it in the Ground Nit-Wits with their stupid signs with stupid finger pointing at the Ground had better think this load of Malarkey their being fed to them by the M.S. Media and the various Eco-Freak Group and look at their Utility Bills
By saying it’s all due to socialists and communists, Plimer just encourages them to dig their heels in further and he gives the extreme Right carte blanche to call themselves Leftists and progressive when they are the very opposite. The demand to reduce CO2 emissions was originally made by the extreme Right; they were never from the Left. Socialists and communists care about the plight of working people. They want cheap energy to fuel industries and economic growth. It’s the extreme Right who want to ruin ordinary people.
I’m not sure what your definition of extreme right and extreme left is, but you throw the terms around in a way that makes your comment meaningless.
Maybe you could give an example of a right wing organization or prominent member that believes CO2 emissions are a crisis that commands the attention and action by the entire global population to the exclusion of just about everything else.
Or a bonified left wing call for ignoring climate issues and just producing the cheapest energy whether it be from coal, oil, nuclear, sunshine or whatever as long as it is cheap and reliable because that is all that matters.
Ariane, you make no sense at all ! Mind you, I like your JOKE OF THE DAY.
“Socialists and communists care about the plight of working people. ” Fell off my
chair laughing.
The three original goals that started the climate change movement were the desire for de-industrialization, an excuse for new taxes, and the desire to expand the power of government. These are not goals supported by the extreme right. If you look at the climate change policies being advocated in by some in Congress, it is the leftists who are advocating them. Some of the organizations advocating extreme action on climate change that would harm the average family are anti-Semitic. Today that is signature behavior of Marxists.
The Left likes to accuse their detractors by accusing them of what they themselves are up to.