Many eco-activists (and too many legislators, regulators, judges, and journalists) have trouble thinking beyond slogans.
They apparently believe declaring ecological emergencies, repeating clever mantras, and issuing proclamations and mandates will create a fossil-fuel-free, organic farming utopia.
In their dreams. [emphasis, links added]
Since 1950, American farmers increased per-acre corn yields by an incredible 500% – and other crop yields by smaller but still amazing amounts, while using less land, water, fuel, fertilizers, and pesticides. Their exports helped slash global hunger and malnutrition.
Farmers in Brazil, India, and other countries worldwide have likewise enjoyed record harvests in recent years. Their success has many “roots.”
Hybrid seeds combine valuable traits from different plants. Biotech seeds protect crops against insects and viruses and reduce water and pesticide demand.
Nitrogen fertilizers (synthesized from natural gas) join phosphorus and potassium in supercharging soils. School and online programs offer libraries of agricultural success tools. Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) further spurs plant growth.
Long-lasting herbicides control weeds that would otherwise steal moisture and nutrients from crops, while enabling farmers to utilize no-till farming that avoids breaking up soils, reduces erosion, further retains soil moisture, and preserves vital soil organisms.
Israeli-developed drip irrigation delivers water without the evaporation characteristic of other irrigation methods.
Modern high-tech tractors use GPS systems, sensors, cameras, and other equipment, which steer precise courses across fields, while constantly measuring soil composition, and injecting just the right kinds and amounts of fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides, along with seeds, to ensure optimal harvests.
Imagine the bounteous crops for humanity if all these technologies could spread across the globe.
Instead, this planet-saving, life-saving progress is under assault – by well-meaning or ideologically driven, ill-advised or ill-intended … but all well-funded … organizations that demand natural gas bans, “more Earth-friendly” agriculture, and a return to “traditional farming lifestyles.”
Their hatred of biotech crops is intense and well-documented, but they also despise hybrid seeds. They want modern herbicides and insecticides banned, in favor of “natural” alternatives that are often toxic to bees, animals, and people; may actually be synthetic (eg, neurotoxic pyrethrins); and are rarely tested for residues on produce or long-term toxicity to humans.
They demand “natural” fertilizers, which provide a tiny fraction of the nutrients that modern synthetic fertilizers do.
They want to teach only “traditional” (ie, subsistence) farming, especially in Africa. They prefer to call it “food sovereignty” – which they claim is the “right” to “culturally appropriate” food produced through “ecologically sound and sustainable methods,” in accord with AgroEcology policies.
In other words, millions more people (ruling elites and their kids?) doing back-breaking stoop labor, from dawn to dusk.
Tractors? Why not horses, oxen, or human labor, they ask? At least get rid of gasoline and diesel tractors and trucks, in favor of electric models.
Never mind that EV tractors and combines would require several tons of battery modules, and still wouldn’t be able to do a full day’s work without hours-long recharges.
They want oil and gas locked in the ground. “We don’t need petrochemical products, especially synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides.” Or tractor tires, paint, windows, GPS/computer housings, and more.
Have these illiterati looked at their own clothing, food, homes, offices, or world?
Synthetic fabrics, cosmetics, cell phones and computer housings, pharmaceuticals, tapes and adhesives, protective gear, eyeglasses, car bodies, detergents, wind turbine nacelle covers and blades, medical devices, car bodies – practically everything around them and in their lives exists because of oil, gas, and petrochemicals.
But we can just use biofuels to replace feedstocks for products we really need, they proclaim. Right.
Banishing oil, gas, petrochemicals, and internal-combustion engines would certainly mean no more ethanol as a gasoline additive.
That would eliminate the need to grow corn on 36,000,000 acres (equivalent to Iowa), and that land could be used for food crops or wildlife habitat. Except it won’t be.
Organic farms have significantly lower crop yields per acre and require far more land than conventional agriculture.
Worse, ending oil and gas production means tens of millions of acres would have to be planted with biofuel crops to provide feedstocks for thousands of now-petrochemical products.
That means vastly more tractors or human labor – and more water, fertilizers, and pesticides – to cultivate and harvest sugar and oilseed crops (and algae).
And then all those simple biofuel molecules would have to be transformed into much more complex hydrocarbons to provide the necessary feedstocks.
That would require even more energy, from even more wind turbines and solar panels – on top of doubling or tripling our existing electricity needs, to transform the U.S. and global economies to all-electric systems, and repeatedly recharge the grid-balancing and power backup batteries those systems would require.
Or perhaps Team Biden plans to simply import all those petrochemicals and/or products – as it seems to be planning with regard to wind turbines, solar panels, battery modules, transformers, and other “green” energy equipment.
America will not be able to produce any of it, because Team Biden and its allies oppose mining and drilling in the USA (even for raw materials essential for their utopian “renewable” energy transformation) and we won’t even have affordable, reliable electricity to operate factories.
How can these “best and brightest” decision-makers and advisors be so ignorant, inept, and clueless – so unable to connect even two or three dots?
They’re destroying our planet, habitats, and wildlife to “Save the Earth” from a computer-modeled “climate crisis” that President Biden absurdly insists is “a greater threat than nuclear war.”
They base critical policies that deeply affect lives and livelihoods everywhere on childish beliefs in Santa Claus and Harry Potter.
They think we can banish today’s energy and agricultural resources and technologies – and amazing replacements will just be there – via some mystical, mythical process called Materials Acquisition for Government-mandated Infrastructure Change (MAGIC).
Some of them know this cannot possibly happen, but promote the policies anyway.
They seem to believe they can mandate that “common folks” will just have to live austerely, under nineteenth or early twentieth-century living standards, in 700-square-foot apartments, using electricity when it’s available (not when they need it), and subsisting on bug burgers and larvae milk.
They think Africa would be “the perfect laboratory” for testing new foods, like “crackers, muffins, meat loaves, and sausages” made from lake flies. If all that fails, they’ll just impose forced rationing.
Others would go even further. Obama science advisor John Holdren advocated “de-development of the [United States and other over-developed countries] and semi-development of the under-developed countries, to approach a decent and ecologically sustainable standard of living for all in between.”
Oceanographer Jacques Cousteau once said, “in order to stabilize world populations, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”
Environmental Defense scientist Charles Wurster said “People are the cause of all the problems… We need to get rid of some of them, and [banning DDT] is as good a way as any.”
Environmental and racial justice? Campaigns, policies, and government actions to eradicate fossil fuels and modern agricultural practices and technologies go well beyond callous and imperious.
They go well beyond eco-imperialism, eco-colonialism, and eco-Apartheid. They drive eco-manslaughter on a global scale via energy, farming, and climate policy. They impose systemic, systematic racism.
These ideas, and these policy proponents, are what should be banished from government, media, and academic institutions. Not the wondrous technologies that make modern life possible.
Paul Driessen is a senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, climate change, environmental policy, and human rights.
I read aa book the Good Old Days They were Terrible one illustration shows a Beach littered with dead animals and rubbish
Right, the reason behind the problems are people because they are fully dependent on machine and comfort life . In order to make life easier we are producing harmful chemicals and high level technology that need for fuel ,metals, energy etc . In result we are harming our environment making pollutants that our environment system would not tolerate and we have to suffer at high level . Everything will be better if it is done in limit and by taking care of environment.
For any queries visit us on Energy Environmental Solutions http://sourcetester.org/
My new neighbours think like you do and live the kind of life you’d approve. No chemicals, no meat, no soap. In one year they turned their property into an eye sore, laughing stock of the neighbourhood. Goats, chickens, mangy dogs. They’re from Eastern Europe and I believe they’re Gypsy/Roma. They say that God will someday cleanse the Earth. They consider themselves clean. In a perverse kind of way, they’re entertainment for me. Every time I deal with them, I walk away shaking my head.
When I was in High School one of the wrong headed slogans was FIGHT POLLUTION GET A HORSE the wrong side is the person who came out with that did,nt mention about Horse Poo it was that way in the Horse and Buggy Days and today Horses get better vetenaraian care then they did back then
For a idea of just how bad things were ‘way back when’:
https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2011/03/29/the-horse-manure-problem/
It’s a ‘nose-clogging’ eye-opener.