• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden May Use These Four Climate Actions, Further Weakening Our Economy

by Chuck DeVore
2 years ago
in News and Opinion, Videos
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
5

biden warren markeyPresident Joe Biden visited the site of a long-shuttered power plant in Somerset, Massachusetts, to threaten action on climate change in the next few weeks if Congress doesn’t act.

With inflation at highs not seen in 40 years, largely driven by escalating energy costs made worse by Biden’s own anti-oil and gas policies, Congress won’t act. [bold, links added]

They won’t act because most lawmakers want to get reelected and with inflation the No. one concern of Americans, only the most ideologically committed Democrats in the safest seats will vote to make gasoline, diesel, and electricity more expensive.  

As a result, executive orders and regulations are the only options available to the president as his administration considers the timing of declaring a national climate emergency.

Until then, the president announced two partial steps. 

First, diverting federal dollars to communities facing hot weather — though the 2017 National Climate Assessment, completed when Biden was vice president, shows that the incidence of heat waves has decreased in the U.S. over the past 100 years.

Politically speaking, this measure amounts to nothing more than rewarding your friends with borrowed federal dollars.

Second, removing environmental safeguards and other roadblocks to placing more wind turbines off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.

If built, these costly platforms, subject to storm and salt damage, will likely suffer high failure rates while causing harm to vital fisheries and marine life. 

But with West Virginia Democrat Senator Joe Manchin continuing to express concerns about the sputtering economy and inflation that’s dinging the average family for an added $5,000 a year for gasoline, electricity, and food, the legislative route will remain difficult.

It’s simple math: Manchin and 50 Republican senators constitute a majority.

And what might the trust-fund elites who run Biden’s energy and environmental policies impose on the rest of us after a declaration of a national climate emergency?

A preview suggests an array of actions, all of which will be eventually found unconstitutional under the “major question” doctrine, that an executive branch agency can only regulate when Congress has clearly given it that authority.

There are at least four looming threats to our economy.

Enlisting the Defense Production Act (DPA) in the climate emergency. Used by former President Donald Trump to boost the production of ventilators and N95 masks, Biden then deployed the DPA for COVID-19 as well and then extended its use to try to get more baby formula to market.

If used creatively — and likely illegally — the DPA could be used to force companies to join the “war” on climate change.

The Federal Power Act could be used to divert electricity within the U.S., shifting power from regions that have planned for their needs to states, such as California, that went all-in on periodic renewable power, thus exposing it to an increased frequency of blackouts.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has already launched a draft rule to mandate “climate-related disclosures.”

This rule would require all publicly traded companies to catalog their CO2 emissions — including those of all their suppliers, whether public or private. The rule would cost billions in compliance costs, shifting resources from productive to non-productive activities.

Lastly, the Environmental Protection Agency is likely to issue new, lower particulate thresholds.

Many of the particulates we breathe are generated naturally — such as by wildfires — or dust from construction and farming.

As the use of hydrocarbons became cleaner over time, particulates from powering vehicles and generating electricity have plummeted, improving air quality.

This means that additional reductions in particulates would likely entail severe and costly restrictions on existing power plants and cars and trucks.

If Biden does declare a “climate emergency” in the coming weeks, he will be unconstitutionally usurping the power of Congress to pass legislation.

The net effect of his power grab will be higher prices, lawsuits, and massive losses for the Democrats in 2022.

Read more at Fox News

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Truth
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Del
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki iconOdnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • Yummly
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related

Next Post

Biden's False Claims About Extreme Weather Echoed By Compliant Media

Comments 5

  1. Randy Verret says:
    2 years ago

    Excellent video imbed in the article! One of the better discussions I’ve heard regarding the multiple factors at play when you consider an energy transition. Large scale offshore wind is NOT the way to go. It is incredibly expensive and I question whether you can scale it up to meet electricity demand, especially if you misguidedly retire reliable thermal generation (i.e. coal, nuclear & natural gas) prematurely. This isn’t some type of “social science experiment.” If we continue to ignore basic energy imperatives, there will be a consequence. The one guest on the video is absolutely right. In the energy arena, there is NO FREE LUNCH…

    • boffey says:
      2 years ago

      “Large scale offshore wind is NOT the way to go. It is incredibly expensive ” It is a partial answer and it is not ” incredibly expensive”, which is why
      Shell is investing billions in it.

  2. Boffey says:
    2 years ago

    The oil and gas industry has delivered $2.8bn (£2.3bn) a day in pure profit for the last 50 years, so there is where all your money has gone.

    • Randy Verret says:
      2 years ago

      Not sure where you are getting your numbers, but the oil & gas industry is an extremely capital intensive industry. If you check available manufacturing data, you’ll find that industry falls (generally) in the 6-8% rate of return on investment. You’ll get a 10% ROR in a “banner” year, historically. That puts them comfortably in the middle to lower middle of the pack among manufacturers. It’s all about scale. As far as Shell with offshore wind, they are making an investment because they are one of the premier offshore E & P companies worldwide. They will look to leverage that deep water expertise in a potential market as an energy company. The key is (ultimately) if they can get a return on that long term investment. We shall see. Check out available data through the Energy Information Administration (EIA). You can verify subsidies for renewables vs. fossil fuels. Not the same “picture” the media & activists claim…

  3. Pig ZIZ Pigs says:
    2 years ago

    Biden should use only one escape form.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom debate june 24Newsom Jets To DC To ‘Stand With’ Biden Amid Wildfire Emergency, Foregoes Virtual Meeting
    Jul 5, 2024
    After declaring a state of emergency over statewide wildfires, Newsom jetted to DC instead of meeting virtually as other governors did. […]
  • ev charging expoThe 500,000 Nationwide EV Charger Network Is A $7.5 Billion Charade
    Jul 5, 2024
    The 500,000 charging stations will cost the government $400 billion, not the $7.5 billion the President has promised. […]
  • wheat harvestIgnore The Climate Crisis Hype: Humanity Is Thriving Thanks To Fossil Fuels
    Jul 5, 2024
    Climate crisis? Thanks to fossil fuels, very few times in history have seen such rapid progress as the period from the mid-20th century to now. […]
  • electric car charging stationEnergy, Business Groups Urge Supreme Court To Halt California’s EV Mandate For All Americans
    Jul 5, 2024
    Numerous trade groups are asking the Supremes to review a lower court’s decision that allows California to push electric vehicles on the entire U.S. […]
  • Keir Starmer rallyAs Brits Struggle With Net Zero Costs, Labour Plans To Accelerate Unpopular Green Schemes
    Jul 3, 2024
    Fast-tracking Net Zero will hike energy bills, smother the economy, and spark an almighty backlash. And Labour is promising just that. […]
  • city underwaterMeteorologist Exposes How Media Is Hyping NOAA’s ‘Computer-Modeled’ Sea Level Scare
    Jul 3, 2024
    Hyperbolic predictions on New York City and sea level rise have been around for decades, and not one has come true or shown they will. […]
  • bavaria germanyJune 2024 German Weather Was Close To Normal, No ‘Hellish Summer’ In Sight
    Jul 3, 2024
    June in the Central European region was highly variable with periods of both cool and summery weather. In other words, no hellish summer in sight. […]
  • biden DC Emergency Operations CenterBiden Calls Climate Skeptics ‘Really, Really Dumb’, Announces WH Summit On Summer Heat
    Jul 3, 2024
    When Biden spoke at the D.C. Emergency Operations Center, he called Americans 'really, really dumb' for doubting his climate alarmist rhetoric. […]
  • hurricane berylAs Hurricane Beryl Swirls, Media Push Climate-Fueled Nonsense
    Jul 2, 2024
    The press and some meteorologists are saying that climate change is 'fueling' an historic Hurricane Beryl. Evidence says otherwise. […]
  • protest fight climate changeClimate Activists Have Embraced A Crazy New Goal: Abolish Fossil Fuels With Lawfare
    Jul 2, 2024
    After failing with consumers, businesses, and at the ballot box, climate nutters are using the courts to end fossil fuels. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Portions © 2024 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Climate Change Dispatch