In another foretaste of potential future ‘carbon allowance’ limits, a major bank in Australia has introduced a new feature that links purchases to a customer’s carbon footprint and warns them when they are going over the average.
Australia’s Commonwealth Bank (CBA) has partnered with CoGo, a “carbon management solutions” company, to launch the new feature, which is part of CBA’s online banking platform. [bold, links added]
The bank gives the customer the option to “pay a fee” to offset their carbon footprint, with the average listed as 1,280 kilograms, a long way from the ‘sustainable’ figure of 200 kilograms.
A person’s carbon footprint is calculated and then an ‘equivalent’ metric is shown to make the customer feel guilty about it, such as “8 trees being cut.”
“By combining our rich customer data and CoGo’s industry-leading capability in measuring carbon outputs, we will be able to provide greater transparency for customers so that they can take actionable steps to reduce their environmental footprint,” CommBank Group executive Angus Sullivan said in a statement.
The bank has promised to refine the calculation to show how much CO2 individual purchases are responsible for.
While initially presented as a handy way for someone to track their consumption habits and the supposed impact they have on the environment, some fear that such schemes could one day become mandatory and place limits on purchases of customers who exceed their ‘carbon allowance.’
As we previously highlighted, allied with climate lockdowns, technocrats want to exploit hysteria over climate change to increase financial control over individuals.
Such a proposal was presented in the science journal Nature by four environmental “experts” as a means of reducing global carbon emissions.
Everyone would be issued with a ‘carbon allowance card’ “that would entail all adults receiving an equal tradable carbon allowance that reduces over time in line with national [carbon] targets.”
The authors make it clear that the program would be a “national mandatory policy.”
Carbon units would be “deducted from the personal budget with every payment of transport fuel, home-heating fuels and electricity bills,” and anyone going over the limit would be forced to purchase additional units in the personal carbon market from those with excess to sell.”
Of course, the wealthy would be easily able to afford the offsets, and many of them are directly invested in the trading mechanisms that the scheme would be based on.
The proposal makes clear that the means of measuring a person’s uptake of carbon units for travel would function “on the basis of tracking the user’s movement history.”
The authors note that mass compliance with COVID-19 lockdown regulations has greased the skids for further intrusive tyranny and that, “people may be more prepared to accept the tracking and limitations related to PCAs to achieve a safer climate” as a result.
Read more at Summit News
Big brother in the land down under and now big brother turns Green
Bankers are supposed to be shrewd I thought.
These clowns are naive political sheep. IMO
Thus is all part of the totalitarian globalist control tightening around Australians’ necks.
It is necessary to look beyond those who announce these decisions, to those who actually make the decisions. Otherwise, it is too easy to blame incompetence. Those making the decisions are perfectly competent with regard to tyrannical control. They merely promote the incompetent as a bulwark against the wrath of the people and as an aid to their own malicious rule.
It is certain that some are planning to make carbon tracking mandatory including purchasing additional allotments for those that exceed their quota. A simple way to defeat this, at least in the US, is to use cash. Without going into the reasons why, the US will never become a cashless society. I’m not sure about tracking movement because using cell phones in many instances there is no way to distinguish between private cars, public transportation, or car pooling. This can also be defeated by carrying cell phones in a small metal case. Like wind a solar energy, there is a big difference between trying to impellent it and having it work.
Bitcoin beat them to it, but the government is watching and learning.
I can recall, from the late 1940’s, my mother taking me into the Brisbane Commonwealth Bank (corner of Adelaide and Albert streets) to open a children’s savings account. Big fancy building, and the ceiling was ‘way up there’. People milling around waiting to be called to a teller.
As I think back: a ‘machine’ with a few humans as the direct interface with the public. Impersonal. I switched to ANZ some years later. More personalized attention.