The Oscar-nominated and Emmy-winning documentary Gasland is often credited with spawning the movement to oppose fracking.
The 2010 documentary, which was written and directed by Josh Fox, portrayed fracking operations as poisoning groundwater, killing wildlife, and making people sick, while corrupt oil companies profited. [emphasis, links added]
It predicted that if the practice wasn’t banned, communities’ water supplies would become undrinkable and wildlife populations could be decimated.
Nearly 14 years after “Gasland” was released, numerous studies have contradicted its claims about fracking, and its dire predictions didn’t come to pass. …
The documentary energized the environmentalist opposition to the industry and led to bans in some states, including New York, the practice grew exponentially in many states, including Colorado, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, and North Dakota.
At the same time, fracking provided massive amounts of crude oil and natural gas, reinvigorating the U.S. oil and gas industry.
From 2007 to 2022, production of natural gas increased 88%. In July 2018, U.S. crude oil production topped 11 million barrels per day for the first time.
A 2015 study estimated that the industry supported 2.7 million jobs in 2014 and that it could potentially support nearly four million by 2030.
The most infamous scene in “Gasland” is where a Colorado man lights his tap water on fire, which Fox blames on fracking operations in the area.
In 2010, responding to the emblematic scene, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) tested the man’s water.
The commission found no evidence of chemicals used in the fracking process and concluded the methane that burned in the scene was the result of natural causes.
“ ‘Gasland’ is one of the most infamously misleading and deceptive documentaries out there. I’d catalog it as less reliable than Ancient Aliens, frankly,” Linnae Lueken, a research fellow at the Heartland Institute, told Just The News.
The COGCC analysis cites reports from as far back as 1976 that found naturally occurring methane in the groundwater.
Journalist Phelim McAleer found these reports and confronted Fox at a screening of the film in Chicago. Fox stated he was aware of the reports, but he said the information was “not relevant.”
McAleer told Just The News that Fox has never really corrected the record on the misleading scene.
“That’s not relevant? How can you say that? You’ve built a multi-million dollar anti-fracking industry on the back of that image,” McAleer said. “But yeah, that image is fraudulent, but it’s not relevant. We obviously have different views on journalism.”
Just The News reached out to Fox by email and Facebook and did not receive a response.
After McAleer posted the video of the exchange with Fox on YouTube, Fox’s lawyers convinced YouTube to remove the video. McAleer posted it on Vimeo and the same thing happened. Eventually, he was able to get the video reinstated.
McAleer, his wife Ann McElhinney, and Magdalena Segieda produced “Fracknation” in 2013 to challenge Fox’s claims in “Gasland” and “investigate the truth about fracking.” It was funded with a Kickstarter campaign that raised $212,265.
McAleer said the anti-fracking movement was helped in part by the pattern of the oil industry backing down from lawsuits.
Some of the people who claimed their well water was harmed by the companies’ fracking operations filed lawsuits, and in some of the cases, the companies settled rather than fighting it in court. McAleer said this just fueled the perception the companies were guilty.
“We had an epidemic of lawsuits, not an epidemic of pollution,” McAleer said.
Lueken said she was forced to watch the film in high school. The claim Fox made that always stuck with her, she said, was that pronghorn antelope were threatened with extinction because of fracking in Wyoming.
“Anyone who has ever been to Wyoming can see how comedically false that claim is, and was,” Lueken said.
Lueken, who went on to get her bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering from the University of Wyoming, and Timothy Benson, a policy analyst with the Heartland Institute, recently updated a policy brief that challenges four claims about fracking: that it pollutes drinking water, pollutes the air, causes health problems, and causes dangerous earthquakes.
The paper cites dozens of studies that have been done over the years and concludes that the claims of fracking opponents don’t hold up to scientific scrutiny.
This hasn’t deterred the activists. In addition to concerns about carbon dioxide emissions causing a “climate crisis,” the movement continues to insist fracking harms communities.
Top photo via YouTube screencap
Read full post at Just The News
Josh Fox needs all his Awards revoked this was his typical leftists Propaganda and since none of this idiotic predictions happened he is just another False Prophet like Gore and DiCaprio
Show mw ONE prediction the climate jerks made that came true !
That is why they keep moving the goalposts on when gloom and doom will happen as well as keep changing the “problem” from global warming to climate change to climate catastrophe. And keep stating that any weather anomaly is certainly caused by “climate change” that is caused by increasing CO2. They have zero proof that this is the case but these so-called “scientists” and the politicians have the MSM to support them in their quest to destroy our economies.
Way too bad but Gasland was a total seam looks like the Director and Producer just Crashed and Burned
I remembering reading about a study funded by an activist group testing the water where fracking was being done. The study showed that the well water was unaffected. The activists expressed disappointment, but to their credit accepted the results. However, when the facts don’t back their narrative, it is very common for many lie. This is clearly the case with Gasland.
It is very common for activists to take natural occurring phenomenon and pretend it justifies their narrative. When organic matter decomposes in the absents of oxygen the production of methane is common. In some swamps it is possible to ignite methane that is just above the surface. The presences of naturally occurring methane says nothing about fracking.
In the neighborhood where I live in Southeast Aurora, CO, we are sitting on top of extractable oil and gas. And unlike too often the case where the mineral rights are separate from the surface rights we actually own what is beneath us. So the subdivision was approached to approve the fracking and drilling for the oil and gas, which reached the level needed to proceed. However the platforms would be to the north of us on the other side of a reservoir so signs appeared on many lawns saying “Don’t Frack the Reservoir”. They apparently believe the lie that the horizontal pipes coming from the platform to where the minerals are will be just below the reservoir and can cause leakage into the water. However the drilling would go down a mile or more before going horizontal.