Sen. Bernard Sanders suffered criticism last year after he flew on a greenhouse-gas-spewing private jet to campaign during the midterm elections. …
On Thursday, Mr. Sanders said he’ll keep going, pledging to offset his carbon emissions for his 2020 presidential campaign. […]
But the other 2020 Democratic hopefuls, who like Mr. Sanders call global warming an existential crisis, have been slower to put their money where their mouth is.
After inquiries from The Washington Times, only one — the campaign of South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg — said it would consider proactive steps to make up for the dirty business, carbon-speaking, of a campaign.
“He’s pledged not to take contributions from the fossil fuel industry, and we’re looking into ways to reduce the carbon footprint,” said Buttigieg spokeswoman Lis Smith.
Every other campaign contacted by The Times ignored the inquiries, making it anyone’s guess how seriously they will take their emissions.
Even Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, who is making climate change the centerpiece of his campaign, wouldn’t say whether he will offset his carbon.
Carbon offsets are projects such as planting trees to suck carbon from the atmosphere, converting dirty power sources to cleaner ones, or capturing methane emissions from landfills.
Companies seek payments from those spewing carbon, promising to use the money to fund offset projects.
Native Energy, the company Mr. Sanders uses, says it can offset the half-ton of carbon emissions from 1,000 miles of short-haul airplane travel for $8.55.
Offsets were the rage a decade ago, with several high-profile presidential campaigns promising to pay for their emissions during the 2008 race, including Hillary Clinton and John Edwards.
Combined, federal campaigns in 2008 paid major offset providers, including Native Energy and Climate Trust, a total of $230,917, according to federal records.
In the 2012 presidential cycle, when there was no Democratic presidential primary race, expenditures on carbon offsets ran slightly more than $2,000.
The payments to major offset companies increased in the 2016 cycle but at $14,347 remained dramatically below the 2008 level.
After being spotted flying a private jet to campaign events in 2016, Mrs. Clinton promised to offset her emissions, but no record of payments can be found. Her campaign repeatedly ignored questions about the failure in 2016.
Ironically, the Clinton Global Initiative has funded a carbon offset operation.
Only Mr. Sanders and fellow Vermonter Rep. Peter Welch consistently make large expenditures on carbon offsets.
The lack of personal action has not stopped other candidates from complaining about the looming catastrophe.
“Climate change is the most serious threat to humanity today, and we need immediate and bold action to address it,” said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.
Beto O’Rourke, a former Texas congressman, said Americans have a “final chance” to act or face a climate apocalypse in 12 years.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts proposed rebuilding all of the country’s infrastructure in a way that deals with climate change.
“The urgency of the moment on climate change cannot be overstated. It’s upon us and we need to make a change and make change fast. And that means in part rebuilding our power grids, our entire infrastructure system. We need to harden against the coming storms. Underpasses and overpasses and bridges. We need a 21st-century infrastructure that accounts for coming changes in climate, and we need it fast,” she told National Public Radio.
Mr. Inslee called for an “all-out national climate mobilization” to defeat climate change.
“Sounds like most Democratic candidates want to talk the talk of the Green New Deal, but no one is ready to walk the walk,” said Michael McKenna, an energy lobbyist and Republican Party strategist.
Read more at Washington Times
The Democrats are in the pockets of the Greens we all know that by now look at how Bill Clinton learned over backwards to appease the Eco-Freaks the same with Obama their the useful idiots of the Eco-Nazis and Watermelons
The Democrats who use fossil fuels to spread alarmism are hypocrites and their exhaust is hypocrisy.
Suckers believe that they’re spewing greenhouse gases.
“He’s pledged not to take contributions from the fossil fuel industry, and we’re looking into ways to reduce THE carbon footprint,”. What Poo!
Don’t just say it climate change advocates. If you’re really really really looking to reduce THE carbon footprint than “carbon offsets” would be your LAST choice.
Lead by example, WALK THE TALK and Reduce YOUR Carbon Footprint.
Increase YOUR use of video-conferencing tools like Skype and Facetime AND pick video-conferencing times when YOUR use of Green Energy is absolutely assured.(score more credibility points too)
Walk or ride YOUR bike in order to avoid carbon emissions completely. (remember when YOUR travelling by bicycle to make sure YOUR bicycle USB charger is working because we want to hear from you)
For distances greater than 500 miles consider EV Carpooling or EV public transportation which drastically reduce YOUR CO2 emissions by spreading them out over many riders.
If you absolutely must fly, make sure YOUR flying coach because at least those seats almost always fill up anyway. Remember… private jets are forbidden until petroleum-based aviation fuel is replaced.
We are watching… ANY “climate change advocate” candidates campaign, invoking the “carbon offsets” option is “a pile of poo”. And ignoring YOUR campaign’s carbon footprints is a “double pile of poo”
I don’t consider themselves hypocrites, instead they are liars who are being opportunists, taking advantage of the AGW scam to take more and more control over the economy and our lives. Just look at the Green New Deal to see that.
One thing I wish these writers would do is stop using the lying terminology of the left. Trees do not take carbon or if the air but carbon dioxide. And burning fossil fuels releases CO2, not carbon.
With one tweet from President Trump, this could be resolved.
My long experience in industry has the terminology as “walk the talk.” This means do (the walk) what you say (the talk). The article sure didn’t have this right but Gerry did.
What we have here is the elitist attitude that this class is exempted from the sacrifices that the little people must make. This has been going on for a long time. For example, congress has exempted their members from most of the laws they have imposed on American industry.
I agree, WALK THE TALK is correct and concise.
Next, could we settle “I couldn’t care less” ?