• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Elon Musk wants to nuke Mars to make it liveable

by Thomas Richard, Examiner.com
September 12, 2015, 2:43 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
9

nuclear gone badElon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors, wants to nuke the polar ice caps on Mars to speed up terraforming the planet, part of his vision to see a human colony on its blood-red landscape. Musk made the remarks on ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’ this past Wednesday, prompting Colbert to call his guest a ‘supervillain.’ Nuking Mars’ poles, Musk said, would release lots of trapped CO2, methane, and other so-called greenhouse gases stored in the ice, much like here on Earth.

And since Musk foresees people living along the equator of Mars, the radioactive blast would not affect them or any undiscovered life that might be buried beneath the soil. Once the gases are released into the planet’s already thin atmosphere, Mars would presumably warm up. But unlike most of his ideas, this one fails on just about every scientific principle (Didn’t he read the book The Martian?).

According to ZME Science, Mars simply isn’t a suitable planet for terraforming of any kind. That’s because its atmosphere is very thin, roughly “1% as thick as the Earth’s,” and “solar winds are constantly stripping it even further.” And aside from simply warming up the planet, there are other issues as well. The first being that Mars has no magnetic field.

The magnetic field is what is generated by a planet’s core, and unlike the Earth’s, the Martian core is “geologically dead” as its “core solidified a long time ago.” Our core is what keeps radiation from the cosmos, and especially our sun, from radiating all life out of existence. Also, the planet’s core generates a gravitational field, and the “gravity on Mars is .38 that of Earth,” far too low to keep its atmosphere from flittering out into space.

ZME also reports that Mars has “no plate tectonics to recycle carbon and water and rebuild eroded land.” It also has “no large moon to stabilize the axial tilt and provide tides” and has a “much more elliptical orbit, which means much more erratic climate.” Mars has a “much higher rate of impacts due to its proximity to Jupiter and the asteroid belt” as well as “no mountain chains to break up atmospheric currents and release precipitation.”

The surface of Mars is also covered in toxic perchlorates (salts derived from perchloric acid), which are used in fertilizers and making rocket fuel, but pose a serious health hazard to humans. Space.com also writes that “any humans exploring Mars will find it hard to avoid the finest of dust particles” as it gets into “everything…certainly into your habitat.”

Barring someway you could rid the entire surface of Mars of this chemical, ZME writes the “asymmetry between hemispheres” means there would be “all land on one side and all ocean on the other.” But since the planet has only a negligible amount of water (compared to Earth) stored at its poles, melting the ice caps on each end would create a toxic brew of water, radiation, and chemicals that would occupy only one hemisphere of the planet.

Musk’s vision of terraforming Mars dates back to 2001, when he conceptualized a “project to land a miniature experimental greenhouse on Mars, containing food crops growing on Martian” soil. He called it “Martian Oasis.” In 2002, he founded SpaceX with the long-term goal of creating a “spacefaring civilization.”

In 2011, Musk said in a Wall Street Journal interview that he plans to send humans to Mars within 10-20 years. And according to his biography by Ashlee Vance, he plans to have a colony of 80,000 people by 2040. So it would seem nuking Mars into an even more inhospitable planet to attain that goal is currently within his scope. Supervillain or not, though, Elon Musk wants to see people on Mars, whether it’s practical or not.

Source

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
Energy

Climate Science’s Biggest Shift In Decades: IPCC’s RCP8.5 Is Officially Dead

Apr 29, 2026

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • mad scientist africaEnergy Apartheid And The Climate Embargo Starving Africa Of Power
    May 25, 2026
    Kenya scrapped a Microsoft-backed data center consuming a third of its power grid — exposing Africa's climate-enforced energy crisis. […]
  • polar bear wildernessData vs. Drama: Al Gore’s Climate Warnings Twenty Years Later
    May 25, 2026
    Two decades after An Inconvenient Truth, Gore's climate predictions on hurricanes, wildfires, and polar bears have failed to match reality. […]
  • hybrid vehicleTrump DOE Redirects $1.7B In Biden EV Grants To Boost Hybrid Manufacturing
    May 22, 2026
    The Trump DOE is redirecting $1.7B in frozen Biden-era grants away from EV factory conversions toward hybrid vehicles and advanced technologies. […]
  • crystal ball doomTrillions Wasted On UN’s Doomsday Scenario That Hijacked Global Energy Policy
    May 22, 2026
    RCP 8.5, the UN's worst-case emissions scenario, was always implausible, yet it drove trillions in wasteful energy policy before the IPCC retired it. […]
  • RGGI electric billNortheast Governors Preach Energy Affordability As They Secretly Hike Your Electric Bill
    May 22, 2026
    Northeast governors tout energy affordability while RGGI carbon allowances secretly inflate electricity bills to nearly double the national average. […]
  • trump presserTrump’s EPA Scraps Biden-Era Rules Targeting Commercial Refrigerants
    May 22, 2026
    Trump's EPA is scrapping Biden-era refrigerant rules, promising to save Americans $2.4 billion and lower grocery store prices. […]
  • shell gas stationShell Goes To The Netherlands’ Highest Court Over Its Emissions Fate
    May 22, 2026
    Shell heads to the Netherlands' Supreme Court in an emissions case that could redefine corporate climate liability for oil companies worldwide. […]
  • Graham Platner’s China Policy Is Not Just Naive — It’s Dangerous
    May 21, 2026
    Graham Platner thinks cooperating with China is a climate strategy; it's really a blueprint for surrendering America's energy future to Beijing. […]
  • green new dealClimate Change Apocalypticism Was A Fashion, Not A Cause
    May 21, 2026
    For nearly 20 years, progressives preached climate apocalypse. Now Democrats are quietly ditching the Green New Deal as voters demand affordable energy. […]
  • Electric Car chargingAs Federal Subsidies Dry Up, EV Sales Collapse Despite Soaring Gas Prices
    May 21, 2026
    EV sales dropped 23% year-over-year in April even as gas prices spiked. The real culprit? Federal subsidies ended in September, and the market collapsed. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky