• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Who’s Who At COP29: The Taliban, Russia, Climate Reparations, And Carbon Chaos

by Tristin Hopper
November 15, 2024, 12:47 PM
in Energy, News and Opinion
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
3
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

cop29 sign

As COP29 — the United Nations’ annual climate change summit — gets underway in Baku, Azerbaijan, Canadians may notice that their government isn’t broadcasting their participation to quite the same extent as in prior years. [emphasis, links added]

At the Paris Climate Summit in 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was there on day one, promising to the assembled delegates that Canada “will take on a new leadership role internationally.”

Now, carbon pricing is one of the most singularly unpopular issues for the Liberal government, and this is the third year in a row that Trudeau won’t be personally attending the summit, which is taking place from Nov. 11 to 22.

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault showed up promising to hand out more than $1 billion in climate-related foreign aid, and Canada has built an entire pavilion at the conference holding workshops ranging from Addressing Climate Disasters with Equity to Inspiring Change Through Global Children’s Perspectives.

But Baku may lack the glamour of prior UN climate change conferences.

As detailed below, Canada will be rubbing elbows with the Taliban, Putin loyalists — and doing it all in one of the most oily cities on Earth.

The Taliban Is There

The Taliban rulers of Afghanistan have not been allowed a seat at the United Nations General Assembly, and only a handful of countries have established any kind of official diplomatic relations with the government, which officially calls itself the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Still, they can still come to the UN’s climate change conferences.

Over the weekend, Reuters confirmed that representatives from the Taliban’s National Environmental Protection Agency will be going to Baku, making this the most prestigious international summit attended by the rogue theocratic state.

So Is Russia (They’re One Of The Biggest Delegations)

Azerbaijan used to be part of the Soviet Union and still enjoys warm relations with its former ruler.

As recently as August, Russian President Vladimir Putin made a state visit to Baku to ink an “action plan for enhanced bilateral cooperation.”

Internal emails obtained by Reuters also show that Russia was instrumental in having this year’s conference hosted in Azerbaijan versus Bulgaria, a member of the European Union.

All of this might be why Russia is leaning into this climate change conference more than most, with a delegation of 900.

Although they’re representing a country whose economy is heavily dependent on oil and has adopted virtually no material climate policies, the Russian news agency TASS did say that the Russian delegation will be “carbon-neutral” for the first time.

For the Canadians at the conference, this means they’re going to be sharing cafeteria lines and washrooms with representatives of a country whose soldiers Ottawa is helping to kill.

At last count, Canada has contributed $4.5 billion in military aid to Ukraine in countering its invasion by Russia.

The Whole Thing Is Being Held In A Historic Center Of Oil Production

Some of the most notable UN climate change conferences have been held in cities famous for their low environmental footprints, such as Copenhagen, Paris or Kyoto.

For the last two conferences, this trend has been conspicuously ended in favor of convening in some of the world’s most eminent petrostates.

Last year was in Dubai, a city funded, built, and sustained almost entirely by fossil fuels. And this year is in a place whose name is virtually synonymous with oil.

Azerbaijan refinery
A Baku industrial park for oil refining. Photo by Orkhan Farmanli on Unsplash

Baku was the world’s first major oil production center outside of the United States. And pumping oil is still primarily what Baku does.

Oil production represents about half of Azerbaijan’s GDP, as compared to Canada, where it’s only about three percent.

And the lights at COP29 are being kept on by an energy grid that is fueled almost entirely by fossil fuels.

As per the most recent analysis by the International Energy Agency, just six percent of Azerbaijani electricity comes from renewable sources (in Canada it’s more than 70 percent).

[Roughly 68% of Canada’s electricity comes from renewable sources, with hydropower being the largest contributor at about 60%. Other renewables, like wind and solar, account for around 8%. —CCD editor]

COP29’s Headline Goal Is To Convince Rich Countries To Give Trillions To Poor Countries

Press coverage of UN climate change conferences often ends up rallying around a central number. At the Paris Climate Talks, for instance, the goal was summed up as limiting temperature increases to 1.5 degrees above preindustrial levels.

This time around, the main number is a monetary figure: US$1 trillion. That’s one of the suggested targets for the new collective quantified goal (NCQG); essentially a giant pool of money provided by rich countries to finance the climate-mitigation efforts of poor countries.

The World Economic Forum, for one, has rallied around the $1 trillion goal, suggesting that new taxes and pollution levies could fund it.

One of the events scheduled at COP29’s Canada Pavilion. © Via canadacop29pav.ca

The Number Of Delegates Is Way Up Over Previous Years

Only a few years ago, Canada was routinely sending one of the largest delegations to UN climate change conferences.

In 2015, Canada sent 283 delegates to Paris; a contingent that was double the size of the American team, and triple the size of the United Kingdom’s.

This time around, Canada’s delegation doesn’t even make the top 20 for size. But it’s not so much that Canada is sending fewer people. Rather, it’s that the rest of the world is sending massively inflated delegations as compared to previous years.

Canada is sending about 370 people to Baku. Compare that to an an analysis by Carbon Brief which found that Brazil registered 1,914 delegates, Turkey registered 1,862 and even the African nations of Chad and Nigeria are beating Canada on attendance (387 and 637, respectively).

All told an estimated 65,000 people are coming to Baku. That’s nearly double the 36,000 who showed up to the Paris conference in 2015.

Activist groups, for one, are saying that part of the delegate inflation is due to the increasing presence of oil industry lobbyists at the conference; 2,456 as compared to 636 last year, according to Kick Big Polluters Out.

Top photo by Matthew TenBruggencate on Unsplash

Read more at MSN

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Report: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out

May 28, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

GM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped

May 28, 2025
News and Opinion

Predictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F

May 28, 2025

Comments 3

  1. David Lewis says:
    6 months ago

    At COP 29 there are 1,700 lobbyists for the fossil fuel industries. Many in the meeting are outraged at this. However, from the first year NGO’s have been at these meetings. These include radical organizations such as the Sierra Club that are pushing polices that would result in energy starvation shutting down western civilization. These NGO’s have significant influence but are self appointed. Unlike countries they have no elected constituency. To say that it is okay to have NGO’s at these conferences but it is not okay to representatives of fossil fuels is one of the many hypocrisies of the climate change movement.

  2. Liardet Guy says:
    6 months ago

    It’s rather weird, isn’t it? I am surprised that say 50,000 attend. It must be very boring. What do they talk about at the fringe meetings? Noticed that the hall was half empty for Sir Keir Starmer’s platitudinous speech with its palpable scientific lies. I do hope he’s not going to give them any money. It will just go to the Wa’Benzi as usual

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 months ago

    I am sure no one Flapped their arms to get there nor did they come on Magic Carpets the all Flew In on Private Jets wee driven these in Limos and used all that Electricity and Water a nd the combined Carbon Footprint was larger then the Average American Family

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Biden signs executive orderReport: Biden Likely Unaware Of Harmful Climate Policies His Admin Churned Out
    May 28, 2025
    Who’s really behind Biden’s energy agenda? Major executive orders reshaping U.S. policy were never publicly addressed by the president himself. […]
  • Biden visits GM EV plantGM Dumps EV Plan, Pours $888M Into V8 Engines After Biden Mandates Scrapped
    May 28, 2025
    GM pivots NY plant from EV parts to V8 engines as GOP, Trump EPA dismantle Biden’s electric vehicle push and California’s EV mandate. […]
  • earth sunrisePredictive? Study Finds IPCC Climate Models Overstate Warming Up To 4.5°F
    May 28, 2025
    New study finds IPCC climate models overstate warming nearly 4.5°F, with benchmark models proving far more accurate in long-term forecasts. […]
  • Government Accountability OfficeSenate GOP Accuses Govt Watchdog Of Trying To Save California EPA Waiver
    May 28, 2025
    Republicans are criticizing the GAO for showing bias and overstepping its bounds in trying to stop Congress from repealing California’s EPA waiver. […]
  • NYC traffic congestionFederal Judge Blocks Trump’s Bid To Kill NYC Congestion Toll
    May 28, 2025
    A federal judge blocked Trump’s bid to kill NYC’s congestion toll, preserving New York’s climate law and traffic-cutting program—for now. […]
  • Gavin Newsom PresserGavin Newsom Is Seething After Congress Repealed California’s Gas Car Ban
    May 27, 2025
    Gov. Newsom is steamed after Congress repealed a Biden EPA waiver letting California ban gas-powered cars and said he'll fight back. […]
  • Capitol Hill DCCongress Resurrects Fight Against The Climate Cult’s Regulatory Assault
    May 27, 2025
    Congress eyes bills to rein in climate overreach, challenge secret science, and expose hypocrisy fueling the elite-driven climate change narrative. […]
  • mosquitoNo, Climate Change Isn’t Behind Britain’s Mosquito Fears
    May 27, 2025
    The Guardian asserts that climate change will make the UK more hospitable to mosquito-borne diseases, ignoring established drivers. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfill‘Green’ Waste Piles Up As Solar Panels And Wind Turbines Pollute Landfills
    May 27, 2025
    Solar and wind waste is piling up with no clear plan for disposal, raising new questions about the cost of going green and the myth of net zero. […]
  • new orleans blackoutMISO Ignored Warnings Before Holiday Blackout Left Blue City In The Dark
    May 27, 2025
    Nearly 100,000 lost power in New Orleans after MISO cut the grid, raising alarm over blackout risk tied to green energy replacing coal and gas. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch