• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Meteorologist Exposes How Warmer Nights, Not Hotter Days, Skew Heated Climate Claims

Warmer summers? Not so fast Axios: nighttime lows, not daytime highs, drive the heat.

by Anthony Watts
June 04, 2025, 10:31 AM
in Extreme Weather, Media, News and Opinion, Science
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
6

beach summer
In its recent article, “America’s summers keep getting warmer,” Axios claims that hotter summers across the U.S. are “one of the clearest ways we experience climate change.” That statement is misleading. [emphasis, links added]

The article focuses exclusively on “average summer temperatures” while ignoring crucial underlying details — specifically, the difference between daytime highs and nighttime lows.

A closer look at the data suggests that rising nighttime temperatures, not dangerous daytime heat, are mostly to blame for the modest increase in “average” temperatures. This pattern is a well-documented signature of the urban heat island (UHI) effect, not global climate change.

The entire Axios piece hinges on the idea that an increase in average temperatures over the past 50 years (from 1970 to 2024) proves human-caused climate change.

But here’s the problem: an “average” can be deceptive. By combining daily high and low temperatures into one metric, the nuance disappears. And that nuance matters.

According to detailed meteorological analysis done by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), high temperatures (daytime maximums) in the U.S. have remained relatively stable, while low temperatures (nighttime minimums) have been increasing.

This skews the average upward without indicating an actual increase in daytime heat, the kind that poses the most risk to people and infrastructure. This is backed up by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) analysis, Mapping U.S. Climate Trends, from the NOAA climate website.

This report highlights that nighttime minimum temperatures have warmed at a rate of 1.43°F per century compared to 0.89°F per century for daytime maximums during the period 1895–2016, illustrating the asymmetric warming trend.

Summer (June, July, August) Maximum Temperatures with trend, from NOAA data. Source
Summer (June, July, August) Minimum Temperatures with trend, from NOAA Data. Source

The real-world implication of this divergence is crucial. If daytime highs aren’t increasing substantially, the scare factor vanishes. Nobody complains about slightly warmer nights — in fact, many people prefer them.

But when you average those warmer nights with stable daytime highs, you get the illusion of “climate change” through rising average temperatures. And that’s precisely the sleight of hand that Axios and its source, Climate Central, are engaging in.

This divergence was comprehensively documented in recent peer-reviewed research by Dr. Roy Spencer, former NASA scientist and principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

In a 2024 paper published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Dr. Spencer examined the spatial relationship between population density and temperature trends using NOAA data from 1895–2023.

His findings? The UHI effect is the dominant cause of warming in U.S. temperature records, especially in the minimum temperatures that drive up averages.

As the population increases, more asphalt, buildings, and energy usage trap heat at night, particularly in cities. This is not global warming — it’s local heat retention caused by development. Spencer’s full paper is available here.

Now, to Axios’s credit, it does briefly acknowledge the UHI phenomenon, noting that “many cities suffer from ‘heat islands’ — areas of especially high temperatures caused by roads, parking lots, buildings and other heat-trapping features”.

But it buries that admission and fails to connect it to the broader implication: if these “heat islands” dominate the temperature increase, then the change is local and anthropogenic in an entirely different sense — a land-use artifact, not a carbon dioxide crisis.

This is not a new argument. As we’ve outlined repeatedly at Climate Realism, the UHI effect explains much of the warming shown in localized temperature datasets.

Yet climate advocacy groups like Climate Central — heavily cited in the Axios article — downplay or ignore this effect when it doesn’t serve the narrative.

More fundamentally, its data often supports the skeptical case when viewed critically. For example, it charts average temperatures but omits daily maximum temperature trends — an omission that speaks volumes.

Another critical flaw in the Axios article is its lack of statistical scrutiny. The claim that 97% of cities analyzed saw warming since 1970 might sound compelling, but it’s also meaningless without examining how much of that warming occurred in rural versus urban stations.

Rural stations, being less influenced by land-use changes, would provide a better indicator of climate trends untainted by urbanization. But Axios doesn’t provide that breakdown — likely because it would undercut the headline.

Further, the cherry-picked focus on specific cities like Reno (+11.3°F), Boise (+6.3°F), and El Paso (+6.2°F) is another red flag. These cities have undergone dramatic urban expansion and population growth since 1970.

Reno’s population has more than doubled; Boise has added tens of thousands of new homes and highways. Of course, they’re warmer — they’ve built over their thermometers.

As we’ve shown at Climate at a Glance, genuine climate signals must be filtered through the noise of land-use changes, otherwise, the data is just measuring asphalt’s heat-retention effects, not atmospheric temperature increases due to the supposed heating effect of carbon dioxide.

It’s also worth noting the psychological tactics in the article. Loaded language like “health risk,” “pregnant women,” and “vulnerable groups” is peppered throughout to provoke emotion rather than provide objective data analysis.

The appeal to emotion is a classic rhetorical device used to bypass rational scrutiny. Instead of showing a balanced analysis, Axios jumps straight from a graph of average temperatures to policy implications and public health warnings. That’s advocacy journalism, not science reporting.

In conclusion, the Axios piece is yet another example of lazy climate reporting masquerading as fact. It relies on average temperatures while ignoring the high/low divergence, fails to contextualize the UHI effect despite briefly mentioning it, and leans heavily on emotive language rather than objective data analysis.

If this is the best journalism Axios can muster, one must seriously question its editorial standards and scientific literacy. It is not informing the public — it is selling a narrative, one misleading map at a time.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 6

  1. Richard Greene says:
    4 months ago

    “The UHI effect is the dominant cause of warming in U.S. temperature records, especially in the minimum temperatures that drive up averages”

    False.
    UHI is a minor cause.

    The primary cause of TMIN warming is CO2 emissions.

    Warming since 1975 has been about 60% TMIN and 40% TMAX.

    I explained why the Spencer claim is wrong in a comment on a prior article.

    It looks at US summers only, not the entire globe over a full year.

    Then claims that most UHI warming was before 1970.

    Spencer made a meaningless wild guess.

    I have been banned from making this comment, or any other comments. at Spencer’s website and also at Watt’s website.
    They do not tolerate fact checking.
    They prefer censorship.

    Reply
    • David Wieland says:
      4 months ago

      Your insistence that “The primary cause of TMIN warming is CO2 emissions” marks your comment as another repetition of unscientific propaganda. Claiming that Spencer et al states that most UHI warming was prior to 1970 is another whopper. Ignoring how modest even the alarmist claims of warming have been is yet another. No wonder sites don’t let you contaminate their comment sections.

      Reply
      • Steve Bunten says:
        4 months ago

        Greene has no background in meteorology, geology, or other degree but knows so much that he can tell us how ignorant or lying scientists like Anthony Watts (a meteorologist) or Dr. Matt Wielicki and the University of Alabama Huntsville climate scientists. Not worth listening to him.

        Reply
        • Richard Greene says:
          4 months ago

          Your appeal to authority logical fallacy ignores all the facts I presented.

          Reply
      • Richard Greene says:
        4 months ago

        You are angry because a conservative hero of yours has published bad science.

        That’s why you want censorship of my comments.

        Climate Realism has also refused to publish the comment that was published here.

        A more complete analysis of Spencer’s bad science can be found in the article below.
        This is from a conservative Canadian website.
        I suspect you would immediately reject the article if it was at a leftist website.
        Unlike you, I seek the truth. I am not interested in telling Republicans or Democrats what they want to hear.

        https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2025/05/21/uhi-in-the-us-is-high/

        Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 months ago

    Summers are Hot Winters are Cold and Spring & Fall are a little of the both its been doing that long before Back Yard BBQ’s and SUV’s

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky