• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

WaPo Falsely Blames Climate Change For Wildfires, Ignores Fuel Buildup And Human Impact

by Linnea Lueken
January 21, 2025, 9:29 AM
in Extreme Weather, Media, News and Opinion, Science
A A
2
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

wildfire aftermath suburb
The Washington Post (WaPo) recently published an article claiming that President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for Secretary of the Department of Energy Chris Wright was wrong when he claimed that climate change has not fueled more frequent and severe wildfires. [emphasis, links added]

Wright is right, and WaPo is wrong.

Climate change is not causing worse wildfires, but policies pushed by Democrats in California and at the state and federal levels have likely been contributing factors.

The article, “Trump’s Pick For Energy Secretary Rejects Linking Climate Change And Wildfires,” complains that Chris Wright has “argued that climate change has not fueled more frequent and severe wildfires — a claim at odds with the scientific consensus.”

Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) asked Wright during the confirmation hearing whether he thinks wildfires are “just hype” when it comes to climate change, Wright replied that he stands by his past comments rejecting the claims that climate change has caused more and worse wildfires.

The Washington Post (WaPo) cites a single study that examined only the past 20 years. Other fire records go back much further and are more comprehensive.

WaPo also quotes climate-alarmist scientists Michael Mann and Andrew Dessler, both of whom have somewhat untrustworthy pasts when it comes to confirmation bias on the subject of climate change, especially when it comes to how data should be analyzed, discussed by Climate Realism here and here, respectively.

Looking at the recent California wildfires, which these same alarmists have blamed on climate change, the claim just doesn’t jibe with the evidence.

As pointed out by atmospheric scientist Cliff Mass, for example, even if there had not been a dry winter for the region, the weather conditions were such that even if rain occurred the day before the blazes started, it still would have occurred.

This is because the dry Santa Ana winds were strong enough that the grasses and vegetation that ended up burning would have been dried out regardless of preexisting wet conditions.

California’s winter has indeed had a late start to the rainy season, but this is not part of a longstanding climate trend. The trend for Los Angeles winter rainy seasons has been an increase in precipitation since the 1950s, not a decrease. (See figure below)

Figure 1: Figure originally posted by the Cliff Mass Weather blog.

Indeed, the previous years’ wet conditions contributed to the buildup of lush, brushy growth, which when a dry year came, dried out providing fuel for the fires.

Therefore, it is pretty clear this year’s fires are not a climate issue but rather a weather phenomenon. Climate science, which WaPo claims that Wright is running afoul, confirms that the Santa Ana winds that contribute to drying fuels and exacerbating wildfires should decrease with modest warming.

As Mass explains:

It makes complete sense that global warming would weaken the Santa Ana winds.

Such winds are driven by a difference in pressure between inland high pressure and lower pressure to the south and west. This high pressure is associated with low-level cool air (cool air is denser and heavier than warm air), which will be warmed due to global warming, thus reducing the pressure difference that drives the Santa Ana winds.

Globally, the amount of land burned by wildfires has significantly declined, as has the amount of land in the United States since the beginning of the 20th century.

There has been a small uptick in acreage lost to wildfires in recent decades, the cause of which WaPo is more than happy to ignore: environmentalist-driven land management practices and demographic shifts with more people moving into areas historically prone to wildfires.

Meteorologist Anthony Watts explains in the post “No, Mainstream Media, Climate Change Isn’t to Blame for California’s Wildfires:”

Decades of fire suppression policies have allowed fuel – (aka, dead trees, dry brush, and dense vegetation) – to accumulate, creating tinderbox conditions. A report from Cal Fire explains the role of vegetation management in reducing fire risks and outlines how fuel accumulation has made fires more intense.

Meanwhile, urban expansion into wildland areas (the so-called wildland-urban interface) places more homes and infrastructure in harm’s way. Studies by the University of California, Berkeley, highlight the challenges posed by housing developments in fire-prone areas.

Historically, fires that would have naturally thinned forests and cleared underbrush were extinguished, leading to denser forests that burn more intensely.

This is true for California, and true for many other parts of the United States, particularly in forests managed by the federal government (or, rather, mismanaged) versus private property.

Fires in the United States did not start on a minor upward trend until the late 1980s and early 1990s, coinciding with a federal policy shift in forest management philosophy that resulted in a sharp decline in timber harvesting on federal land.

Simultaneously, forest roads used by loggers but also used to fight fires were being ripped out or closed. This resulted in a fuel buildup and made it impossible to get to fires that started in remote areas before they spread to population centers.

WaPo also appears ignorant of what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) actually says in their Sixth Assessment Report, which is that “fire weather” has not gotten worse, nor is it expected to get worse between 2050 and 2100 even under extreme warming model scenarios. (See figure below)

Wright, in this case, proved himself more knowledgeable about the “consensus” science concerning wildfires than the writers at WaPo.

As a thoughtful human being, in his testimony, Wright rightly acknowledged the tragic and terrible destruction caused by California’s fires and empathized with those suffering there.

But he was equally right to refuse to attribute them to climate change the way Democrats and alarmist media prodded him to.

WaPo should consider checking the facts before citing scientists known to have crossed over into advocacy concerning the “consensus science” on wildfires. WaPo is certainly keeping its readers in “darkness” on climate reality.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Newsom’s War On Oil Could Send California Gas Prices To $9, Analyst Warns

May 9, 2025
Energy

The Climate Scaremongers: More Lies From The UK’s Crackpot Climate Change Committee

May 9, 2025
Energy

UK’s Green Agenda Blows Up As Ørsted Kills Massive Offshore Wind Project

May 9, 2025

Comments 2

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 months ago

    Just like the New York Slimes the Washington Compost spews its typical Fake News then they wonder why the American People no longer trusts them

  2. Aaron Mathes says:
    4 months ago

    What a complete load!

    Mark Levin a week ago, showed New York Times, NPR, and other left leaning headlines for at least 20 years chronicling Gavin Newsom’s complete neglect on fire prevention in California, clearly with the express intent of increasing their severity solely to blame it on “Global Warming” er, “Climate Change” sorry, it’s tough to keep their snake oil terms straight they change em so often!

    Gavin Newsom Misled Public About Wildfire Prevention Work, Report Says
    https://www.npr.org/2021/06/25/1010382535/gavin-newsom-misled-public-about-wildfire-prevention-work-report-says

    In California, Controlled Fires Can Save Homes. Why Aren’t More Happening?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/07/us/california-controlled-fire.html

    HOW YEARS OF CORRUPTION AND MISMANAGEMENT
    LED TO LA RUNNING OUT OF WATER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PALISADES WILDFIRE
    https://nypost.com/2025/01/08/us-news/how-la-ran-out-of-water-in-the-middle-of-the-palisades-fire/

    PAST AS PROLOGUE: MORE THAN 20
    YEARS LATER, CALIFORNIA FACES ANOTHER MAN-MADE ELECTRICITY CRISIS
    https://americafirstpolicy.com/issues/past-as-prologue-more-than-20-years-later-california-faces-another-man-made-electricity-crisis

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom presser gas pricesNewsom’s War On Oil Could Send California Gas Prices To $9, Analyst Warns
    May 9, 2025
    Refinery closures and Newsom’s hostility to energy companies could push California gas prices from $6 to $9 a gallon, analyst warns. […]
  • protest time is upThe Climate Scaremongers: More Lies From The UK’s Crackpot Climate Change Committee
    May 9, 2025
    The UK’s Climate Change Committee is ramping up the panic, but real-world data shows no rise in floods, heat deaths, or costs—just more failed predictions. […]
  • yorkshire offshore windUK’s Green Agenda Blows Up As Ørsted Kills Massive Offshore Wind Project
    May 9, 2025
    Orsted scrapped the Hornsea 4 offshore wind project, dealing a massive blow to Ed Miliband’s green vision and raising questions about UK net zero targets. […]
  • ev charging station16 States, DC Sue Trump Admin Over EV Charger Funds, Most Have Built None
    May 9, 2025
    17 states sue the Trump administration for access to $5 billion in EV charger funding, despite most failing to build a single charger. […]
  • weather montageNOAA Quietly Kills Its Billion-Dollar Disaster Database And Report After Years Of Criticism
    May 9, 2025
    NOAA has quietly retired its Billion-Dollar Disaster list after years of criticism over transparency, accuracy, and scientific integrity. […]
  • german wind farmHow Wind And Solar Sent Energy Prices Sky-High in ‘Green’ Countries
    May 8, 2025
    Adding more green energy makes power more expensive, not cheaper—due to unreliable output, required fossil fuel backup, and taxpayer subsidies. […]
  • bernie sanders fox newsBernie Sanders Defends Private Jet Use, Says ‘He’s Too Important’ To Fly Coach
    May 8, 2025
    Bernie Sanders and AOC are facing criticism for using private jets while promoting their climate-focused “Fighting Oligarchy” tour. […]
  • blackout stationGreen Energy Suicide: The West Pays The Price For Its Net-Zero Delusions
    May 8, 2025
    Green energy policies clash with reality as Europe and the U.S. face blackouts, soaring costs, and a collapsing power grid. […]
  • wright trump exec orderDOE Scraps $4.5M Website And Logo Project Meant To Showcase Green Agenda
    May 8, 2025
    The DOE canceled a $4.5 million contract the Biden admin awarded for a new agency website and logo that highlighted the green energy transition. […]
  • desantis bill signing‘Dead On Arrival’: DeSantis Signs Law Banning Geoengineering And Weather Modification In Florida
    May 7, 2025
    DeSantis has signed legislation shutting down geoengineering and weather modification projects in Florida amid rising voter concerns. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch