• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Nuclear Scientist: HBO’s Chernobyl More Fiction Than Fact

by Kelvin Kemm
June 19, 2019, 2:43 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
3

HBO Chernobyl firemanAs a nuclear physicist, I can report that HBO’s Chernobyl was sensational fiction inspired by real events, not a factual documentary.

Melting faces makes for riveting television but is no more realistic than the zombie cannibalism in the Walking Dead.

It is vital that viewers understand that nuclear energy is perhaps our best source of electricity. Frightening people away from clean, abundant, safe and affordable nuclear does the world a great disservice.

Here’s an example. Late in 1972, a horrific story broke to the world. The story of Uruguayan Air Force flight 571.

The chartered flight was flying a college rugby team and members of their families from Montevideo in Uruguay to Santiago in Chile, for a rugby game. There was five crew on board, in addition to 40 passengers.

As the aircraft crossed the frozen Andes the pilot made a tragic navigation error and descended towards what he thought was Pudahuel Airport. The aircraft struck a rocky ridge projecting from a mountain.

Both wings sheared off and like a toboggan, the aircraft fuselage raced down the steep snow-covered slope to come to rest on a glacier. Of the 45 on board, only 33 survived the crash. The pilots were killed.

During the freezing night which followed, five more died. Seventeen days after the crash an avalanche struck the wrecked remains and killed eight more starving people.

The remaining seventeen starving, half-frozen survivors were all devout Catholics and were highly responsible moral people. They were facing starvation and certain death as the dead lay frozen outside in the snow.

After much personal agonizing and prayer, they collectively took the dramatic decision to eat their dead team members. One of the team was a medical student and he, over a few days, explained that certain organs, plus the brain, contained valuable nutrients. So they ate those as well as the human flesh.

SEE ALSO: The Only Green New Deals That Have Ever Worked Were With Nuclear, Not Renewables

After a staggering 72 days they were rescued, two days before Christmas. That is how the world came to learn of the story.

After an initial horror reaction, people around the world sympathized as they learned that the survivors prayed over their dead comrades and carved up the bodies with great reverence and respect.

The survivors won over the hearts of the public.

A TV series was made of this agonizing tale and I watched it. It was good and accurate. However, imagine if decades later a TV producer decides to make another TV series of that story.

Imagine that the series comes out and is aired. It reasonably accurately tells the story of the aircraft crash, the fractured fuselage slide in the snow and the desolation.

But then an episode shows survivors whooping and smashing bodies to pieces with sledgehammers and axes. They tear out livers and smash skulls, to greedily eat the brains. Then after dinner, a survivor plays a wild drumming rhapsody on the aircraft fuselage, using human bones as drumsticks. The survivors sing along.

How do you seriously think that a TV public would respond? Would they exhibit sympathy and understanding, or revulsion and disgust? Would they call for forgiveness for the cannibalism, or would they demand prosecution?

The HBO-produced TV series ‘Chernobyl’ is a case in point. Chernobyl happened. It is a part of history. People died. Things went wrong. Yet today tourists visit the Chernobyl area and wildlife thrives. So what actually happened?

HBO apparently recorded record viewership figure. Good for their income, but was it honest income, income to be proud of?

SEE ALSO: Climate Scientists Reject Wind And Solar, Demand Nuclear-Powered Future

As a nuclear scientist, I can tell you that the fundamental story of the sequence of events during the portrayal of the Chernobyl accident was correct. Issues around governance and procedure as portrayed were essentially correct.

But the blood and skin peeling scenes were not. Sadly the producers lied – intentionally, to gain box office income. They succeeded in the income goal.

But they insulted us nuclear scientists and insulted the intelligence of those viewers who knew a bit more science than most.

They also led many other viewers down a twisted path to further ignorance and confusion, which certainly should not be the objective of a history documentary.

The series tended to show the Soviet authorities of the day as uncaring and unskilled. That was not true. Yes, that period of history was during the formality and the rigidity of the Soviet communist system of the era. Yes, the military-type hierarchy of the time did play a role.

However, in reality, Russian nuclear scientists had been worrying for some time about that type of Chernobyl reactor design and had voiced concerns to the senior authorities. Albeit slow, a response was taking place. Tests of failure systems were being carried out.

Chernobyl had been ordered to carry out one such test, to test the speed of response to a failure. So such a test was set up.

SEE ALSO: Nuclear Power And The Climate Conundrum

Chernobyl staff was instructed to create a deliberate failure mode situation, to see how the reactor responded. This was arranged and was supposed to have been done in the daytime when the main skilled team was on duty.

But the high district demands for electricity caused them to delay the test until around midnight when the lesser caliber night-duty team were on duty. In addition, the more senior decision makers in the line-of-command had gone home.

To clip all the technicalities very short; when the intentional test procedure started to go wrong, worried Chernobyl technicians made some wrong moves and rapidly compounded the unfolding drama.

As the reactor went out of control a fast line of communication via local HQ to Moscow did not function; the seniors had gone home.

That reactor-type had been built to an out-of-date design containing a large amount of highly combustible graphite. It caught fire. Somebody correctly called the fire brigade.

They responded as they should have and attacked the fire as if it were a burning woodworking factory. That was a mistake.

The firemen bravely attacked the flames – without fully realizing that the smoke was carrying radioactive dust and other crud. Lumps of burning graphite which lay scattered around contained radioactive debris from the initial gas blast that blew the reactor to pieces.

Other first responders were also brought in; police, military, helicopter pilots, who all did their duty, as they would have in any other major fire.

But there was radioactive dust and smoke being swirled around.

Human bodies do not become radioactive in a situation like that. What can happen is that someone, like a fireman, leaves the scene with radioactive dust on his clothes and maybe in his hair.

Any radiation protection officer present would then make him take off all his clothes and take a good shower, before going home.

SEE ALSO: Germany And Calif. Would Have 100% Clean Power If They’d Bet On Nuclear, Not Renewables

Firemen were not radioactively contagious, as portrayed by HBO. A fireman could not have irradiated his pregnant wife at home as HBO claimed. Her baby could not have died of heart and liver disease as a result.

That is pure HBO bunk. Something like playing a tune on the aircraft fuselage in the Andes using human bones as drumsticks. Very good for viewer horror, but very far from the truth.

A very large dose of nuclear radiation will undoubtedly kill a person. But the skin will not peel off one’s face.

In fact, a human can pick up a fatal dose of radiation in under an hour and not even know it. The person would go home in apparently perfect condition, but then start to feel as if he had eaten rotten fish for lunch.

HBO Chernobyl face meltVomiting would result and flu-like symptoms would set in. This would, over a couple of hours, lead to shaky hands and wobbly legs, bad vision and a general breakdown of body functions.

Death would come quite quickly, in days. But in reality, no viewer-riveting skin peeling off the face, or blood dripping from anywhere would occur.

After the real Chernobyl incident, 29 fire-fighters died. They died of what the medics call ‘synchronous injuries’. In other words, a ‘combination of factors.’

Undoubtedly radiation exposure played a major role. But those brave fellows also attacked high-temperature flames, breathed in dense toxic smoke, and physically exerted themselves under terrible conditions.

It seems that HBO producers did not consult any nuclear physics specialists, or medical people knowledgeable in the field. They relied on more dramatic emotional advice.

HBO must have made a lot of money with the series. Their shareholders are no doubt very pleased. But certainly, HBO has not done any service to the truth and to the education and enlightenment of viewers.

Read more at CFACT

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    This movie is nothing more then a remake of Hanoi Jane’s movie THE CHINA SYNDROME the usial junk we get from he Hollywood left

  2. Big T says:
    6 years ago

    Many animals are thriving in the area, with no ill effects.

    • Frank Garrett says:
      6 years ago

      Ummm, nope. Wildlife is coming back but the number of cancers affecting the deer, wolves and other wildlife show their life expectancy is much lower in the ‘exclusion zone.’

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Hurricane winds key west2025 Hurricane Forecast Was Overly Alarmist (Again)… Atlantic Season Ending Near Normal
    Nov 10, 2025
    NOAA’s 2025 hurricane forecast hyped an active season, but storm activity is ending up close to average. […]
  • protest global warningAs The Left Tunes Out Climate Change, Democrats Push Costly Green Energy
    Nov 10, 2025
    As the Left tunes out climate change, Dems pivot to costly green energy framed around affordability. […]
  • COP30Climate Doom Patrol: COP30 Opens In Brazil As Top Emitters Skip Summit
    Nov 10, 2025
    COP30 kicks off in Brazil as top emitters skip, and the Amazon is cleared for a summit road that goes nowhere. […]
  • BBC headquartersBBC Launches Investigation Into Bias Of Its Climate Change Coverage
    Nov 10, 2025
    The BBC will investigate its climate change coverage as the broadcaster faces a mounting credibility crisis. […]
  • lana iiiLula’s Diesel-Guzzling Hotel Boat Heads To COP30 Climate Summit
    Nov 7, 2025
    Brazilian President Lula’s hotel boat will burn 4,000 liters of diesel to attend COP30, highlighting climate hypocrisy. […]
  • Queasy cowUdder Chaos: Cows Collapse After Eating Danish Gov’t’s Methane-Lowering Feed
    Nov 7, 2025
    Danish cows are collapsing after the gov’t pushes methane-lowering, greenie-drugged feed, sparking outrage among farmers. […]
  • GreenlandNew Study: Greenland Ice Melt Still Defies Alarmist Warming Claims
    Nov 7, 2025
    New study finds Greenland has had almost no net warming over the past century, challenging alarmist climate claims of rapid ice melt and sea level rise. […]
  • Rescue catAP Pushes Climate Guilt Over Your Pets’ Carbon ‘Pawprint’
    Nov 6, 2025
    AP targets pet owners with a bizarre climate change piece warning about dogs’ and cats’ so-called carbon 'pawprints.’ […]
  • UNFCCC headquarters in Bonn, GermanyTime To Stop Funding The Climate Scam And Exit The UNFCCC Treaty
    Nov 6, 2025
    U.S. taxpayers shouldn’t bankroll endless UN bureaucracy while foreign powers reap the benefits—exit now to reclaim sovereignty and energy independence. […]
  • House Energy Committee Probes Biden EPA ‘Gold Bars’ Scandal, Demands Documents
    Nov 6, 2025
    House committee investigators demand records about Dem-linked green groups that were showered with taxpayer cash by the Biden EPA. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky