• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

How Hydrothermal Vents And Other Seabed Structures Heat Our Oceans

by James Edward Kamis, guest post
February 13, 2024, 12:05 PM
in Geology, News and Opinion
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
7

hydrothermal ventOne of the building block principles of the climate change theory is that human emissions have anonymously warmed Earth’s oceans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer recently posted an article (here) that he contends proves superheated fluids and gases emitted from seafloor geysers, aka hydrothermal vents, have little or nothing to do with the recent accelerated warming of Earth’s oceans.

Overwhelming amounts of reliable information taken from hundreds of research studies prove that emissions of super-heated fluids and gases from the estimated 10 million ocean floor geological features, including hydrothermal vents, are responsible for warming Earth’s oceans, not human activities.

Figure 1. Schematic image of an Upper Mantle Convection System (public domain).

Hidden Power of Geological

If emissions from ocean floor hydrothermal geological features have significantly warmed our oceans, why have these forces remained mostly hidden? There are three reasons: Remoteness, Atmospheric Bias, and Insufficient Monitoring.

Remoteness

Seventy-one percent of the Earth’s surface is covered by oceans, which have an average depth of 14,000 feet. The bathymetry (elevation) of Earth’s ocean floors has been measured for many years utilizing sound waves, satellites, and plum line-type methods.

However, these mapping techniques are of low to moderate resolution making it extremely difficult to identify small to medium-height geological features.

Atmospheric Bias

Scientists have for many years force-fit climate trends and climate-related events into an atmospheric context insisting that the root cause of these trends and events are related to atmospheric forces.

This force-fit process does not follow proper scientific methodology because it ignores the climate influence of many other natural forces, most importantly geological forces. Force-fitting all data, observations, and trends into an atmospheric context is here termed “Atmospheric Bias“.

Utilizing varying sources of information, it can be shown that since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in 1880, most of the Earth’s atmospheric and oceanic parameters have gradually and slightly increased during the last 140 years.

For instance, atmospheric temperatures have increased by 0.013 degrees Fahrenheit per year, sea levels have risen by 0.07 inches per year, and ocean surface temperatures have increased by 0.02 degrees per year.

These values are well within normal ranges of increase since Earth entered the post-Ice Age warming period often referred to as the Interglacial Period.

Geological forces are an important component of the gradual change of ocean and atmospheric parameters. Attributing most modern-day changes on our planet to atmospheric forces is a biased and incorrect methodology.

Insufficient Monitoring

The primary reason geological forces have remained hidden is insufficient monitoring. To properly calculate the effect geological forces have on our oceans, atmosphere and climate, it is necessary to improve the current monitoring system of terrestrial and the 10 million seafloor geological features.

Nearly all the monitoring of ocean floor geological features is done by the ARGO Buoy System. There are currently 3,500 buoys that float across all of our oceans. Their position is constantly recorded and then sent by the onboard PGS system.

The buoys can control their ocean depth, record ocean temperature, and record ocean salinity. Most believe that this is a sufficient amount of data to accurately measure the warming effect of the ocean floor’s geologic features. This isn’t the case.

The buoys only descend to a depth of 6,000 feet. The average depth of the Earth’s oceans is 14,000 feet. Therefore, the buoys do not descend deep enough to accurately record many dynamics of the ocean floor’s geologic features.

One Buoy Every 40,000 Square Miles

Earth’s oceans cover 139,700,000 square miles of Earth. There are 3,500 floating and sinking ARGO Buoys. This equates to one buoy every 40,000 square miles. Described another way, that’s 0.03% of the ocean surface.

There aren’t enough buoys to construct a high-definition three-dimensional map of ocean temperature and salinity.

Geologists have known for many years that all geological features such as seafloor fault segments, volcanoes, hydrothermal vent complexes, etc. turn on and off in irregular patterns.

To calculate the frequency of on-and-off periods it is necessary to leave ocean monitoring devices atop the active or dormant geological features for a long time. Currently, this is nearly impossible to achieve.

An alternative way to achieve this goal is to significantly improve the ability of satellites to measure on and off periods and develop new buoys that can descend to 14,000 feet. By integrating these two methods it will enhance our ability to record on and of periods.

The time each geological feature emits heat before turning off is an important factor in determining the total volume emitted.

El Ninos and La Ninas

Figure 2. Comparison of the 1997 – 1998 El Nino and La Nina events. Note that each has the same “Source Point” and distribution patterns. (Image credit NOAA and some labeling by J. Kamis).

The El Nino/La Nina cycle is generated by ocean floor geological forces and not by changes in earth’s atmospheric temperature as contended by those advocating the Climate Change Theory. Here are a few of the key pieces of evidence supporting this contention.

  • All El Niños and La Ninas originate at the same small geographical highly geological active ocean location here termed the fixed “Source Point” (Figure 2). They also end at the same point off the coast of South America. This information indicates that they are unlike all other major weather phenomena such as hurricanes and typhoons that originate in different specific areas and end at different specific areas.
  • The surface shapes of El Niños and La Ninas are long, linear, and cone-shaped. The boundaries infer that the energy source is not moving and is very powerful. Plumes of ash emanating from land-erupting volcanoes have the same long, linear, and cone shape as El Ninos.
  • The Source Point’s area is one of the most geologically active regions on Earth because it is home to the junction of five extremely active major fault systems, the second largest ocean floor lava plateau on Earth, hundreds of ocean floor volcanoes, and a tremendous number of ocean floor hydrothermal vents.
  • There are helium gas plumes associated with the formation of all El Ninos. The surface shape of the plumes is long, linear, cone-shaped, has distinct boundaries, and emanates from the same Source Point of El Ninos. Helium gas plumes are proof of significant volcanic activity. (see here).
  • The energy needed to generate an El Nino and then convert to a La Nina is off the chart. This amount of energy needed to fuel an El Nino/La Nina cycle cannot be of atmospheric origin.
  • El Ninos and La Ninas don’t occur in any other locations in the world. Why? If they are atmospheric in origin, there should be El Ninos and La Ninas. There are none.
  • Computer models that are supposed to predict the beginning and end of El Ninos and La Ninas fail (see here).

Figure 3 is a time frame slice taken from a 4-dimensional video compiled by NOAA. The video provides absolute proof that El Ninos and La Ninas are of geological origin. Here are several things to observe while watching the video.

The El Nino heat source is located at the ocean floor and not the atmosphere as contended by Dr. Spencer’s article. The warmed water is expulsed in heat bursts that do not lose their definition into surrounding ocean water until they reach the west coast of South America.

Figure 3. Four-dimensional video of El Nino warm phase and La Nina Cool Phase Generation via https://eos.org/editors-vox/learning-from-an-extreme-el-nino (Video credit NOAA’s NCI Division and EOS and some labeling by J. Kamis)

Calculating the Number of Ocean Floor Hydrothermal Vents

Figure 4. Three-dimensional high-resolution image of the elevation in an expansive ocean floor region. Volcanoes are large cones. hydrothermal vents are small cones (Image credit Public Domain, Google Earth, and Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project).

Dr. Spencer’s conclusion that hydrothermal vents don’t significantly influence ocean warming is invalid for another reason. He hasn’t properly taken into account the number of vents on ocean floors.

High-Resolution Mapping Ocean Floor Elevation

A high-resolution Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project was initiated in 2017. Its goal was to map the elevation of the Earth’s entire ocean floor in high resolution.

The initiative that seeks to galvanize the creation of a full map of the ocean floor says one-fifth of this task has not been completed. When the Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project was launched in 2017, only 6% of the ocean bottom had been surveyed in high resolution.

That number now stands at 19%. High-resolution maps will allow scientists to visualize and then count the true number of ocean floor geological features including hydrothermal vents.

To date, several other studies utilizing high resolution have found hundreds of heretofore uncounted geological features such as hydrothermal vents, large volcanoes, and fault segments (see here).

Continent Moving Ocean Floor Faults

There are three types of major ocean floor continent moving fault systems Pull Apart/Divergent (Figure 5), Push Under/Subduction, and Slide Sideways/Transform. The cumulative length of all three systems is 50,0000 miles.

Faults associated with all three systems extend deep into the Earth’s inner reaches where they tap into massive molten lava chambers. This molten lava is constantly moving upward along the open fault planes. When it reaches the ocean floor it acts to generate huge numbers of super-heat emitting hydrothermal vents, large volcanoes, and fault segments.

Figure 5. Pull Apart/Divergent Fault System. (Image credit Public Domain)

Summary

Dr. Spencer states: “Given these various pieces of evidence, it would be difficult to believe that deep-sea hydrothermal vents — actually, an increase in their heat output — can be the reason for recent ocean warming”.

Here we have shown that his conclusion is incorrect because he doesn’t take into account the enormous amount of geological information that proves that emissions from hydrothermal vents play an important role in warming Earth’s oceans.

Numerous Climate Change Dispatch articles will give the reader additional information concerning the role of ocean-floor geologic features, including hydrothermal vents, in warming our oceans (see here, here, here, here, and here).

Plate Climatology Theory Book

The “Geological Impacts on Climate” book contains numerous examples, backed by over 46 years of integrating my observations and ideas with hundreds of research studies, significant amounts of data, and mountains of information from varying types of scientific disciplines that prove geologic forces affect climate and climate-related events.

Here are a few examples: subglacial volcanoes are melting Antarctic Glaciers, superheated emissions from deep-sea faults are generating El Ninos, and a series of super-volcanic eruptions caused the extinction of dinosaurs.

Biography

James Edward Kamis is a retired geologist who has a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Northern Illinois University (1973) and a Master of Science degree in Geology from Idaho State University (1976). More than 46 years of research have convinced him that geological forces significantly influence, or in some cases completely control climate and climate-related events as per his Plate Climatology Theory.

Note from Author

Dr. Spencer has had a long and distinguished career at NASA. This article is in no way intended to discredit or demean him. However, his approach to estimating the impact of the ocean floor’s geologic features on the temperature of Earth’s oceans fails to take into account the significant amount of geological data and information that proves his conclusion is incorrect.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 7

  1. Colin Joseph Harkin says:
    2 years ago

    Richard, you have been very harsh in your criticism of Kamis.

    He has said in this article and I agree, there is insufficient monitering of the oceans. Number of bouys vs size of oceans. He also questioned why el nino starts in the same location and not in other loctions. Why is that?

    Given the centre of Earth is a massive hot ball of molten lava, there is good reason to suspect that some of that heat is rising up under the oceans and warming the water. Then, the warmer water warms the air above it. Now given that’s happening in the tropics where everything is already warm, what’s the outcome likely to be weather wise?
    Again, given the lack of monitoring, we can’t rule anything in or out. IMHO.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    The Fragile Earth The Delicate Balance of Nature Were Destroying the Earth Mans cutting down the Tree of Life Etc. Some of the biggest Lies we get from the Eco-Freaks and their Partners in Crime form the M.S. Media bottom Feeders just like the Save the Rain Forest scam back in the 1990’s

  3. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    2 years ago

    Acid Rain Acidic Oceans what ever became of all this Adid Rain load of malarkey we were seeing reading and hearing so much about back in the 1990’s the same time we was seeing reading and hearing all this this Save the Forests Nonsense

  4. Richard Greene says:
    2 years ago

    Author James Edward Kamis is a science fraud and a fool

    There arer no global average data on underseas heat releases to determine if the trend is increasing, decreasing or steady over past decades. Therefore, no conclusions are possible. This article is wild speculation not based on appropriate accurate data. Real science requires data. This is not climate science.

    There is no evidence any underseas heat release causes enough ocean warming to be measured at the ocean’s surface

    The author has nothing but meaningless speculation. This is not science. The author is not qualified to hold Dr. Spencer’s briefcase … and has rocks in his head..

    • Sonnyhill says:
      2 years ago

      What you say here can be said about climate alarmism. The science is settled? (Al Gore) Global Boiling? (UN president Guterres) An existential threat? Unfounded speculation and lies.
      As for submarine heat releases, energy can not be created or destroyed. It has to show up somewhere, like El Nino.

    • Steve Bunten says:
      2 years ago

      The author has nothing but meaningless speculation. This is not science.

      You can (and should) use the exact same statement about the vast majority of “climate alarmism” reporting that is purportedly based on science. And yet I don’t see that happening.

  5. Mark Rubin says:
    2 years ago

    Interesting read. I will add another thought supportingbthe idea that geological features can be heating the ocean. Some of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn are described as frozen oceans but heated liquid below the outer ice cap…. heated by geological features within the moon… and thought to be good places to find alien micro-organisms. No one disputes these theories…. no one states it is implausible that the geology of the moon can heat these frozen oceans… so why then would it be implausible for Earth geology to heat Earths oceans? Add to this without geological heat input there are only 2 mechanisms i can think of that would warm Earths oceans…. air temp exceeding surface temp…. which would perversely mean the ocean is cooling the atmosphere…. and would not only happen in the El Nino part of the Pacific but anywhere and more likely towards Arctic oceans….. and anamolously high levels of clear skies … extended periods of sunshine…. which runs contrary to the idea of a warming world with extra water vapor in the atmosphere that would logically decrease sunshine and insular heating. The more I think about this idea of geological heat input the more it makes sense.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Amazon rainforest road nowhereUK Climate Aid Squanders Billions On Overseas ‘Greenwashing’ Schemes
    Nov 4, 2025
    UK climate aid wastes billions on overseas projects, with critics calling them a ‘bureaucrat’s dream and taxpayers’ nightmare.’ […]
  • Climate protest time is up posterSCOTUS Urged To Block Climate Lawsuits That Act As Hidden Carbon Tax
    Nov 4, 2025
    Supreme Court faces pressure to block climate lawsuits that trial lawyers admit act as a hidden carbon tax, driving up Americans’ energy costs. […]
  • calif chevron refineryCalifornia’s Great Gasoline Panic of ‘25
    Nov 4, 2025
    California’s fuel market is unraveling after decades of bungled energy policy left the state stranded on its own gasoline island. […]
  • stern looking judge with gavelJudge Blasts Oregon County Lawyers Over ‘Gob Smacking Failure’ Of Court Ethics
    Nov 3, 2025
    An Oregon judge says Multnomah County lawyers crossed the line in climate lawsuit after hiding ties to key evidence that they helped fund. […]
  • boardroom emptySnowball Effect: 900 Companies Ditch Global Climate Initiative, Demand Economic Realism
    Nov 3, 2025
    Nearly 900 companies abandon global climate targets while Bill Gates urges focus on human welfare over doomsday goals. […]
  • Thames River Frost FairThe ‘Climate Crisis’ of 1695
    Nov 3, 2025
    Centuries-old records reveal central England warmed 2°C in 40 years—twice the rate of modern warming. Activists would've called that a 'climate crisis'. […]
  • China rare earth miningUnlocking America’s Rare Earth Riches Could Finally Break China’s Grip On Minerals
    Nov 3, 2025
    Trillions in strategic minerals lie beneath U.S. soil, yet bureaucrats and activists keep them off-limits, giving China a metals monopoly on rare earths. […]
  • COP meetingWhite House To Skip COP30 As U.S. Pushes Back On Climate Doom
    Nov 3, 2025
    The Trump admin says it’s focusing on energy and jobs at home instead of attending another pointless U.N. climate summit in Brazil. […]
  • climate protestExplosive Report Reveals How 5 Foreign Charities Funneled Billions Into Extreme U.S. Climate Activism
    Oct 31, 2025
    A new report shows how a group of foreign 'charities' has spent almost $2 billion bankrolling policy fights and pushing an extreme climate agenda. […]
  • BYD electric vehicleCanada Easing Tariffs On Chinese EVs Could Shake Up The Auto Landscape
    Oct 31, 2025
    Chinese automakers may gain access to North American markets as U.S. carmakers face tougher export odds under Trump’s tariff strategy. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky