• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

‘Fossil Fuels A Lawful Consumer Product’: Baltimore Climate Lawsuit Tossed

by Mandi Risko
July 17, 2024, 8:52 AM
in Lawfare, Media, News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
3
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

shell gas station

In a massive loss for the nationally coordinated climate litigation campaign, a Maryland state judge dismissed the City of Baltimore’s lawsuit against energy companies last week. [emphasis, links added]

The ruling firmly rejects the cornerstone legal theory behind the litigation, explaining that state law cannot be used to advance national energy policy and address a global phenomenon such as climate change:

“The Constitution’s federal structure does not allow the application of state law to claims like those presented by Baltimore. … The Supreme Court of the United States has held that state law cannot be used to resolve claims seeking redress for injuries caused by out of state pollution (sources).” (Bold added)

The defeat of Baltimore’s lawsuit, which was filed in 2018, marks yet another blow for the litigation campaign that is propped up by a national network of activist groups, academics, bought-and-paid-for media outlets, and billionaire foundations like the Rockefeller Family Fund.

It also may be a gratifying moment for neighboring Baltimore County officials, who nixed a proposed lawsuit of their own in 2022 after prescient councilmembers of both parties voiced concerns ahead of a vote to hire Sher Edling, the law firm representing Baltimore City and dozens of other states and cities in similar suits.

Judge: The lawsuit is a “backdoor” attempt to address global emissions

In support of her opinion, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Videtta Brown cited a U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that affirmed the dismissal of New York City’s initial climate lawsuit in 2021, and a January ruling this year that significantly limited the scope of Delaware’s lawsuit.

A deceptively packaged lawsuit doesn’t change Baltimore’s underlying attempt to regulate global energy production, and Judge Brown called out this “backdoor” attempt to address alleged injuries of alleged global climate change that should be handled by legislative means:

“The explanation by Baltimore that it only seeks to address and hold Defendants accountable for a deceptive misinformation campaign is simply a way to get in the back door what they cannot get in the front door.” […]

“Global pollution-based complaints were never intended by Congress to be handled by individual states.” (Bold added)

Judge Brown, who former Democratic Governor Martin O’Malley appointed, also hit the nail on the head in pointing out a fundamental issue with these nuisance suits: the production, use, and consumption of traditional energy sources is entirely legal and necessary for modern life.

“The Defendants’ products have not been deemed dangerous in and of themselves. Fossil fuels are a lawful consumer product guided and regulated by the EPA. Even if the products’ normal function was dangerous, liability still would not attach.” (Bold added)

Experts Highlight Importance of Ruling, Look to SCOTUS

Experts on both sides commented on the importance of the dismissal, namely that the ruling strengthens calls for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the litigation’s merits.

Judge Brown’s decision subtly questioned the Hawaii Supreme Court’s logic in refusing to dismiss Honolulu’s climate lawsuit, a decision that is currently on appeal before SCOTUS:

“The instant case goes beyond the limits of Maryland state law. Again, the bottom line is that Baltimore, like NYC (and if the truth be told Honolulu), intends to hold the [Defendants] liable under [Maryland] law, for the effects of emissions made around the globe over the past several hundred years.” (Emphasis added)

Pointing to the discrepancy between rulings from the Hawaii Supreme Court, Delaware state court, and now Maryland, the Wall Street Journal editorial board argued that the Honolulu petition should be granted, writing that “the growing lower court conflict is an important reason for Justices to hear the case.”

Even Michael Gerrard – a professor at Columbia Law School’s Sabin Center and a key longtime supporter of climate litigation – described the ruling as a “setback” and acknowledged that the Baltimore court’s decision raises the stakes for Supreme Court intervention:

“There are cases going in both directions on this. … This is mostly a matter of state law, with no uniform national outcome, unless the U.S. Supreme Court steps in and shuts all the cases down.”

Bottom line: In dismissing Baltimore’s climate lawsuit in full, Baltimore Circuit Court Judge Videtta Brown rightly saw through activists’ backdoor attempt to regulate American climate policy.

With no wins to speak of, this latest loss may further chill the litigation campaign’s other attempts elsewhere around the country, including in places like Michigan.

Top photo by adrian susec on Unsplash

Read more at EID Climate

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Biden EPA Awarded Billions To Dem-Led Groups With Little Oversight, Watchdog Group Finds

Jun 17, 2025
Agriculture

Media Pushes Climate Fears Over Arizona Wine, But Vineyards Keep Thriving

Jun 17, 2025
Energy

Net Zero Fantasies Collide With America’s Power-Hungry Reality

Jun 17, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    11 months ago

    Sorry Baltimore no soup for you your stupid lawsuit was just tossed out because of Common sense over Greed

  2. David Lewis says:
    11 months ago

    The defendants in these law suits continue to miss a golden opportunity to discourage them. They need to file counter suits for the cost of litigation. This should not only include the cost of the lawyers, but the time the company personal had to spend on the issue. When law firms that were hoping to get big fees if they won fossil fuel suit suddenly had to pay millions in a counter suit judgment, these suits would be discouraged.

    • Col Harkin says:
      11 months ago

      An excellent suggestion David… I wonder why it never happens?

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • BidenBiden EPA Awarded Billions To Dem-Led Groups With Little Oversight, Watchdog Group Finds
    Jun 17, 2025
    EPA’s $20B Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund faces fraud and oversight concerns tied to Biden-era grants to politically connected green groups. […]
  • grapes vineyardMedia Pushes Climate Fears Over Arizona Wine, But Vineyards Keep Thriving
    Jun 17, 2025
    Arizona’s wine industry is thriving, not threatened, as data shows warming and CO2 have bolstered grape yields despite media-driven climate fears. […]
  • wind farm fieldsNet Zero Fantasies Collide With America’s Power-Hungry Reality
    Jun 17, 2025
    The net-zero transition is failing across America as states' renewable goals collapse under surging demand, fewer subsidies, and unreliable green energy. […]
  • Gov Jeff LandryLouisiana’s Gov. Landry Sides With Trial Lawyers Suing Energy Companies
    Jun 17, 2025
    Instead of defending the companies that power its economy, Louisiana’s GOP governor is backing lawsuits against them. […]
  • dumpster garbageTrash Is Now Racist: California Goes Woke On Waste Management
    Jun 16, 2025
    California’s war on landfills ramps up as regulators target trash for racism, emissions, and 'environmental justice.' […]
  • Trump really digs coalTrump Moves To End Biden’s War On Coal That Devastated U.S. Energy
    Jun 16, 2025
    Trump moves to end the EPA’s war on coal by repealing costly Obama- and Biden-era rules blocked by the Supreme Court. […]
  • NY power plant slated to become a 'renewable energy hub'.Media Cries ‘Climate Denial’ After EPA Reverses Unworkable Biden-Era Power Plant Rules
    Jun 16, 2025
    After EPA sought to repeal unachievable Biden-era power plant rules, media backlash followed — along with the usual climate spin. […]
  • President Trump arrives at Calgary International Airport, G7 Summit 2025G7 Ditches Climate And Gender Agenda As Trump Returns To World Stage
    Jun 16, 2025
    The G7 host nation Canada is sidelining climate and gender agendas, shifting its focus to core issues like trade, energy, and AI. […]
  • it's ot easy being greenDemocrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans
    Jun 13, 2025
    Democrats face growing backlash as many Americans reject Biden’s costly climate agenda and Trump rolls back key policies. […]
  • solar panel workerFour GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam
    Jun 13, 2025
    Four GOP senators break ranks, warn against full repeal of green energy subsidies in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch