• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

EPA Power Plant Rules Require Carbon Capture, A Costly Technology Not Expected Until 2055

by Kevin Killough
October 10, 2024, 11:40 AM
in Energy, News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
1
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

power plant night

The EPA’s power plant rule that was finalized in April regulates carbon emissions in the U.S. electricity sector. A central piece of the 1,020-page rule is fitting natural gas- and coal-fired power plants with carbon capture technology. [emphasis, links added]

While the EPA has insisted the technology is “well proven,” recent court filings show the agency’s modeling doesn’t project any carbon capture deployment on new power plants.

Steve Goreham, an energy researcher and author of “Green Breakdown,” told Just The News that he’s not surprised.

The carbon capture facilities in operation today aren’t capturing enough carbon dioxide to make any difference in greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, and it would take an enormous investment to scale the operations up to have a large impact.

“These things, they don’t make a lot of sense,” he said.

Adequately Demonstrated

Critics of the rule argue that the technology hasn’t been proven to work economically at scale, meaning that, under the EPA’s mandates, coal plants will retire early and new gas plants won’t be built.

As a result, much of the grid will be forced to rely on intermittent, expensive wind and solar, which will lead to high energy costs and blackouts.

Carbon capture and sequestration either captures the carbon dioxide emissions at the source, such as the smoke stack at a coal-fired power plant, or it sucks the carbon dioxide from the air, a process called direct air capture.

The captured gases are then pumped into the ground and used in applications, such as enhanced oil recovery.

The EPA has insisted that carbon capture and sequestration technology is “adequately demonstrated” and that “geologic sequestration of CO2 is well proven and broadly available throughout the U.S.”

When the rule was published in May, two dozen states, led by West Virginia, filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, aiming to block the rule while legal challenges play out.

Joining the coalition were seven industry groups, such as the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA).

In July, Reuters reported, the court ruled the states weren’t facing any immediate harm since the earliest deadline for compliance is 2030. The states are now appealing to the Supreme Court to consider their request to stay the rules.

“This rule strips the states of important discretion while using technologies that don’t work in the real world,” West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said in a statement announcing the petition.

NRECA CEO Jim Matheson said in a statement that the EPA’s rules are “unrealistic and unachievable.”

Not Going To Happen

The Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC) Tuesday submitted a brief to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, hoping to get the justices to take a look at the EPA’s regulatory analysis and modeling, which shows the agency’s confidence in carbon capture is lower than they have been saying.

In their letter, the LPSC explained that because of time constraints and the “EPA’s voluminous record,” the commission focused on the rule itself when they submitted their brief supporting the petitioners.

After that brief was filed, the LPSC discovered the results of the EPA’s modeling, which was not included in the documents the justices are reviewing.

“The data shows that EPA’s conclusions with regard to achievability and cost were drawn based on projections that no significant combined cycle generation will ever be added with carbon capture, transportation, and sequestration infrastructure. The same is true of coal capacity ‘with CCS,’” the LPSC wrote.

The agency’s Integrated Planning Model projects no combined-cycle natural gas units will have carbon capture technologies added through 2055, which is the end of the project period.

The EPA also projects no coal units will be constructed with carbon capture through 2055. The modeling document shows that only one gigawatt of existing coal capacity will be operating through 2055.

According to the International Energy Agency, there are now 45 commercial capture facilities in operation globally, capturing a total of 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually.

To reach net zero emissions by 2050, carbon capture has to capture over 1,000 million tons of carbon dioxide every year to be on track to reach the 2050 goals.

“They would need to build 70 to 100 CCS [carbon capture and sequestration] facilities every year until 2050. That’s just something that’s not going to happen,” Goreham said.

As critics of the EPA’s rule point out, should the courts ultimately side with the agency, the rules will have far-reaching impacts on the affordability and reliability of electricity.

Goreham points out that, ironically, while reducing generation capacity on the grid, the Biden-Harris administration’s climate agenda is also rapidly increasing demands on it.

Goreham said there are three main “green” drivers of the demand. First is the EV mandate, which will require replacing large amounts of transportation energy that’s derived from gasoline and diesel with electricity.

The second green driver of electricity demand is the push to electrify home appliances. The third, Goreham said, is plans for green hydrogen, which is made with water and electricity.

“For a single kilogram of hydrogen, you need to spend 50 to 55 kilowatt hours of electricity, which is about as much as a good-sized house uses in two days. And they want to produce billions of these kilograms. We just don’t have the power to do this,” Goreham explained.

He said when you add to this the growing demands for electricity from artificial intelligence, the demands on the grid will go through the roof, meaning we need many more reliable generators on the grid.

“I think these EPA rules are going to be overturned. If we don’t, we’re going to have a big shortage here,” Goreham said.

Chevron

Legal challenges to the rule itself will be bolstered by the Supreme Court ruling in June that overturned Chevron deference, which allowed federal agencies broad latitude in interpreting laws when Congress hasn’t provided specific guidelines.

Under the doctrine, if Congress has granted an agency the general authority to make rules with the force of law, courts generally defer to the agency’s implementation of that general authority.

Read rest at Just The News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Extreme Weather

Study Finds Urbanization Behind Rising Temps, Torching Media’s Overheated Climate Claims

Jun 03, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

House Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change

Jun 03, 2025
Energy

Global Revolt: Over 1,000 Green Energy Projects Rejected Worldwide

Jun 03, 2025

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 months ago

    Under the Demo-Rats the EPA has become just another Burracracy to deal with just like it was under Clinton(Bill)and Obama

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • cityscape sunStudy Finds Urbanization Behind Rising Temps, Torching Media’s Overheated Climate Claims
    Jun 3, 2025
    New study finds urban heat island may explain most temperature rise—casting doubt on media’s heat wave panic and the push to phase out fossil fuels. […]
  • armed epa agentsHouse Panel Investigates Biden’s EPA, DOJ For Targeting Businesses Over Climate Change
    Jun 3, 2025
    House panel is probing Biden’s EPA and DOJ for targeting small businesses with consent decrees, lawsuits, and 'sue and settle' crackdowns. […]
  • tesla superchargers stationNew Jersey Boots Tesla EV Superchargers Off Turnpike As Dems Target Musk
    Jun 3, 2025
    New Jersey removes Tesla Superchargers from Turnpike amid political feud over DOGE and Elon Musk's federal waste initiative. […]
  • Escaping The HeatGermany’s Scorching Summer of 1911 Undermines Today’s Heat Hysteria
    Jun 3, 2025
    Germany’s scorching summer of 1911 shows extreme heat and droughts long predate any so-called CO2 fears. […]
  • solar farm panelsGlobal Revolt: Over 1,000 Green Energy Projects Rejected Worldwide
    Jun 3, 2025
    Global communities reject 1,000+ renewable projects due to land conflicts, habitat destruction, and environmental concerns despite net-zero push. […]
  • alaska pipelineAlaskans Praise Trump’s Push To Reverse Biden’s Sweeping Drilling Ban
    Jun 2, 2025
    Trump officials move to reverse Biden’s Alaska drilling ban, siding with Native leaders and opening millions of acres to energy development. […]
  • kudzo vines old houseAugusta Chronicle’s Climate-Invasive Species Claim Refuted By Georgia Data
    Jun 2, 2025
    Georgia data shows climate change isn’t boosting invasive plants over native species, debunking Augusta Chronicle’s false claims. […]
  • Lufthansa Jumbo Jet‘Great Green Scam’: Airlines To Shift Mandated Net-Zero Costs Onto Passengers
    Jun 2, 2025
    Passengers face soaring costs as EU and UK net-zero rules hit airlines, driving up ticket prices, fuel costs, and compliance fees. […]
  • Biden speaks after signing IRAInflation Reduction Act Is A $2 Trillion Lie Crushing America’s Energy and Growth
    Jun 2, 2025
    The Inflation Reduction Act fuels inflation, energy costs, and reliance on China, risking blackouts and hurting American families and businesses. […]
  • Gov Hochul hearts ChinaCCP-Tied Nonprofit Caught Bankrolling New York’s Radical Climate Law
    Jun 2, 2025
    CCP-tied nonprofit backed New York’s $75B climate law targeting energy firms, raising serious concerns over influence, costs, and national security risks. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch