• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

CNN Relies On Climate Attribution Groups To Foment Fear About Extreme Weather

by Linnea Lueken
June 22, 2023, 9:03 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
3

severe weather collage montageA recent article on CNN relies on the opinions of climate attribution groups, claiming that these groups are able to calculate exactly how much impact climate change has had on various weather events.

These claims are always false.

Attribution claims are unverifiable, untestable, and rely on the presupposition that climate change did make an individual weather event more severe. [emphasis, links added]

The article, “Without climate change, these extreme weather events would not have happened,” relies on the testimony of the World Weather Attribution Initiative, whose members assert that climate change is indeed making weather events more severe, or severe weather more likely.

The CNN post goes on to claim that extreme weather like “droughts, storms, wildfires, and heat waves” are becoming more intense and frequent.

But this is false, as Climate at a Glance shows: the data isn’t clear about whether droughts are becoming more intense according to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; storms like hurricanes and tornadoes show no increasing trend; wildfire data in the U.S. indicates forest policy has more to do with them than warming does; and heat anomalies, especially in the United States, show no increasing trend.

The CNN post breaks weather events into two categories: “Impossible events,” which allegedly couldn’t happen without man-made global warming, and “more likely or severe” because of climate change.

Both of these categories are nonsense.

Under “impossible,” CNN climate writer Rachel Ramirez cites several heat waves from around the world over the past few years, as well as drought from last year in the northern hemisphere and horn of Africa.

One of the examples she gives is the heat wave from 2021 in the Pacific Northwest, which at the time the media touted as evidence of climate change’s impact largely because of the World Weather Attribution Initiative’s say-so.

In a Climate Realism post here, colleague Anthony Watts points out that a single weather event is not evidence of climate change, and quotes from meteorology professor Cliff Mass, Ph.D., who conducted his own analysis of the heat wave alongside historical data.

Mass found that there is no increasing trend for record highs in that part of the country over the period of recent warming.

Not one of the events listed by CNN was definitively linked to climate change—this link was assumed first, as with all climate attribution studies.

As Climate Realism has previously shown, climate attribution is a game of confirmation bias using computers, not falsifiable science.

Statistician Dr. William Briggs does the best job of describing the flaws of attribution science’s methodology in a paper compiled by the Global Warming Policy Foundation:

All attribution studies work around the same basic theme. … A model of the climate as it does not exist, but which is claimed to represent what the climate would look like had mankind not ‘interfered’ with it, is run many times.

The outputs from these runs [are] examined for some ‘bad’ or ‘extreme’ event, such as higher temperatures or increased numbers of hurricanes making landfall, or rainfall exceeding some amount. The frequency with which these bad events occur in the model is noted.

Next, a model of the climate as it is said to now exist is run many times. This model represents global warming. The frequencies from the same bad events in the model are again noted. The frequencies between the models are then compared.

If the model of the current climate has a greater frequency of the bad event than the imaginary (called ‘counterfactual’) climate, the event is said to be caused by global warming, in whole or in part.

Attribution that claims to put a percentage likelihood or a percentage of intensity to weather events is not science, as Dr. William Briggs explained, as they cannot be checked against existing data.

Although the CNN alarmist writer says the events were “impossible” or “all but impossible,” the events were labeled as “almost impossible,” “virtually impossible,” hundreds of times “more likely,” etc. This is not scientific.

Those classified as “made much more likely or more severe by climate change,” includes the “black summer” fires from Australia in 2019-2020, Hurricane Ian, the Western US drought, and flooding in Pakistan from 2022, Climate Realism has debunked every single one of these as they came up over the years.

For example, in a guest post, “Pakistan’s floods and the climate attribution con,” Dr. David Whitehouse explained that when it came to the flooding in Pakistan, World Weather Attribution Initiative members couldn’t honestly claim that recent warming made the flooding worse than it otherwise would have been.

Dr. Whitehouse wrote:

But then they admit the event is well within the range of historical natural variability pointing out that 2022 was the wettest years since err…1961!

And let’s not forget that only a few years ago, climate scientists claimed that “our analysis found that the summer monsoon rainfall is decreasing over central South Asia – from south of Pakistan through central India to Bangladesh.”

Pakistan’s flooding was neither unprecedented nor definitively connected to climate change in the attribution scientists’ own research, despite what headlines claimed.

This kind of rapid attribution without referencing historical data isn’t new; attribution scientists will make these claims for every weather event that makes headlines.

The World Weather Attribution team asserts that they use both “real-world data” and computer models, but comparing real data to fictional data is not appropriate or useful, except as confirmation bias.

CNN should know better, and take more care when they craft their article titles and content if they care at all about truth and not just promoting alarm.

Read more at Climate Realism

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Graham McDonaldCurrently reading a history of the US Coast Guard says:
    2 years ago

    Currently reading a history of the US Coast Guard. Just got to the description of their rescue efforts in a major flood in 1955 in northern California. What with a dam failing, it wasn’t pretty. Seems that some weather events in the past were even worse than today’s.

  2. Colin Joseph Harkin says:
    2 years ago

    If CNN wonders why so many people no longer watch their channel, perhaps if they paid attention to the need to ‘tell the truth’ they just might discover the answer to that question.

    Listen-up CNN – you are nothing but a propaganda outlet for socialism. Period.

  3. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    2 years ago

    CNN(Communust New Network) the creation of Red Ted Turner once again fakes the news which isnt surprising since its mostly leftists propaganda not news the same for the New York Slimes

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • France Aude wildfireWhen Climate Science Gets Ignored, Weather Porn Drives Headlines And Policy
    Oct 21, 2025
    Climate warnings rely on debunked, overstated science, so when new data disproves the scare, media and officials stay largely silent. […]
  • Markey Warren, the OGs of the Green New ScamDems Dial Back Climate Alarm, Pivot To Soaring Electricity Bills They Caused
    Oct 21, 2025
    Democrats downplay climate policy as they shift to rising electricity costs that their green policies and unsustainable subsidies caused. […]
  • climate griftThe Climate Grift Unravels: Sec. Wright Saves Billions By Canceling Wasteful Projects
    Oct 21, 2025
    Secretary Wright has exposed Biden-era climate waste, clawing back billions lost to corruption and green boondoggles. […]
  • Unloading cargo shipRough Seas Ahead: The Coming Fight Over Net Zero Shipping
    Oct 20, 2025
    Net-zero shipping can’t work — but that won’t stop UN bureaucrats from trying to institute a carbon tax again and profiting off its failure. […]
  • Eagle sits on power pole near wind farmSecretary Burgum Orders Crackdown On Wind Turbines Killing Bald And Golden Eagles
    Oct 20, 2025
    Secretary Burgum orders action against wind turbines killing Bald and Golden Eagles, targeting years of government neglect. […]
  • day after tomorrowNew Study Shows AMOC Stable, Contradicting Alarmist Narrative
    Oct 20, 2025
    New research finds the AMOC is stable, challenging claims that the Atlantic current is weakening and triggering extreme cooling. […]
  • Children's Trust RallyGen Z Used To Whip Up Global Climate Lawsuits; Critics Call It Brainwashing
    Oct 20, 2025
    Critics warn left-wing activists are using Gen Z to drum up more global climate lawsuits using fear, brainwashing, and alarmist training materials. […]
  • KamalaKamala Blames ‘Climate Anxiety’ For Young Americans Avoiding Parenthood
    Oct 20, 2025
    Harris says young Americans fear having kids due to ‘climate anxiety,’ echoing alarmist messaging promoted for years by her party and media allies. […]
  • Antarctic Peninsula PenguinsState Of The Climate 2024: ‘No Runaway Warming, No Climate Crisis’
    Oct 17, 2025
    Observational data shows global temperatures, sea levels, and other climate trends remain within normal ranges, with no sign of an emergency. […]
  • cargo shipU.S. Blocks Global Shipping Carbon Tax, Delays IMO Vote One Year
    Oct 17, 2025
    Trump administration successfully blocked a global shipping carbon tax, forcing a one-year delay on the IMO’s vote. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky