• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden Races To Hand Out $25B In Green Loans Before Trump Takes Office

by Thomas Catenacci
November 25, 2024, 8:24 AM
in Electric Vehicles (EVs), Energy, News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
2
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

biden climate presser
The Biden administration is in a hurry to finalize more than a dozen green energy loans worth more than $25 billion before President-elect Donald Trump takes office in mid-January—a frantic effort that lawmakers and industry officials are warning could lead to fraud and abuse of taxpayer money. [emphasis, links added]

Through the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office, the administration is working to finalize a total of 16 pending loans worth a total of $25.1 billion, a Washington Free Beacon analysis found.

Those loans figure to be in serious jeopardy—Trump repeatedly vowed to “terminate” green energy spending on the campaign trail—and, in recent weeks, Biden officials have picked up the pace of finalizing pending commitments.

Over the last two months, the Loan Programs Office closed on seven loans worth $5.9 billion, including two that were closed after the election.

Those two loans went to EV battery component plants in Michigan and New York. By comparison, the office closed on five loans worth $6.5 billion during the prior 27 months.

The quick pace carries risks, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee ranking member John Barrasso (R., Wyo.) and House Energy and Commerce Committee chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R., Wash.) told the Free Beacon.

“Now that the election is over, the Biden administration wants to triple the amount of money passed out to politically connected firms,” Barrasso said. “Congress and the incoming Trump administration will act to ensure taxpayer dollars aren’t wasted on insider payoffs and green pipe dreams.”

“President Biden’s Department of Energy is rushing billions of dollars out the door as a last-ditch effort to advance its failing rush-to-green agenda,” added McMorris Rodgers.

“This effort only increases the risk for Solyndra-style waste and abuse—which is why the administration should immediately end its reckless spending spree.”

Early in the Obama administration, the Loan Programs Office was responsible for providing $535 million to solar panel maker Solyndra, which filed for bankruptcy just two years later.

Solyndra has since become synonymous with wasteful federal spending and is often cited by critics as a cautionary tale when Congress earmarks taxpayer funding for new green energy programs.

The Loan Programs Office’s operations ground to a near halt during the first Trump administration. The office approved just one loan between 2016-2020, an up to $3.7 billion loan guarantee for a Georgia nuclear power plant project in 2019.

But Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 reactivated the office, giving it hundreds of billions of dollars in additional lending power, a massive increase that quickly made it a centerpiece of the Biden administration’s broader climate agenda.

In addition to the $25.1 billion in pending loans, the office is sitting on loan applications requesting a total of $303.5 billion, a number larger than the gross domestic product of nearly 30 states.

Overall, the Loan Programs Office has announced loans worth a total of $37.6 billion for 29 green energy projects since 2022. Officials have been able to close on just 12 of those loans.

“This is an egregious abuse of taxpayer dollars,” said Tom Pyle, the president of the Institute for Energy Research and a member of the 2016 Trump transition team.

“Not one additional loan should go out the door between now and the inauguration. President Trump ran on an energy platform that included repealing the subsidies in the IRA and yet Biden is trying to rush this money out the door before he rides off into the Delaware sunset.”

“On day one, I hope the Trump administration will halt all loans that are not closed and audit all of the projects that have been approved, but especially the ones they are attempting to rush out the door since the election,” he continued.

Mike McKenna, a Republican energy lobbyist who worked in the Trump White House, added that the incoming administration should “retrieve and redirect unspent money at DOE and in other places.”

“The loan program at DOE is too likely to devolve into corruption,” he told the Free Beacon. “It needs to be shuttered.”

Among the loans pending before the Department of Energy, the largest is a $9.2 billion conditional commitment to BlueOval SK—a joint venture between Ford Motor Company and South Korean battery firm SK Battery—to fund multiple EV battery manufacturing facilities in Tennessee and Kentucky. The conditional commitment was announced in June 2023.

A BlueOval SK spokeswoman said the company is actively working with the Department of Energy on final loan approval and “will share details upon conclusion of that process.” Ford declined to comment.

The Department of Energy is also reviewing conditional loan commitments worth a combined $9 billion to the following companies: EV battery company Redwood Materials, hydrogen power company Plug Power, green ammonia producer Wabash Valley Resources, green jet fuel company Gevo Net-Zero 1, South Korean solar panel maker Hanwha QCells, and battery maker KORE Power.

The Free Beacon reported in January that Loan Programs Office director Jigar Shah held a financial stake in Plug Power through his green investment firm before joining the Biden administration, raising conflict-of-interest concerns.

Read rest at Free Beacon

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

Billions Wasted: The 5 Worst Green-Energy Projects That Biden Funded

Jun 10, 2025
Bipolar

Zeldin: Alaska’s Energy Will Power Jobs, Strength, Wealth

Jun 10, 2025
Energy

Green Energy Firm Funded By Biden’s Billions Files For Chapter 11

Jun 10, 2025

Comments 2

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    7 months ago

    Smells like scorched earth to me.
    That’s how the commies defeated the Nazi’s.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    7 months ago

    The biggest Green has lots of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ on it

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Heinz KetchupBillions Wasted: The 5 Worst Green-Energy Projects That Biden Funded
    Jun 10, 2025
    Biden admin approved billions in wasteful green spending—from EV megasites and Exxon hydrogen grants to climate-friendly ketchup upgrades. […]
  • Prudhoe Bay alaskaZeldin: Alaska’s Energy Will Power Jobs, Strength, Wealth
    Jun 10, 2025
    Alaska's vast energy resources drive U.S. dominance, jobs, and security with oil, gas, coal, and critical minerals. […]
  • solar panel installGreen Energy Firm Funded By Biden’s Billions Files For Chapter 11
    Jun 10, 2025
    Sunnova filed for bankruptcy after massive layoffs and a record DOE loan, raising new questions about federal solar energy funding. […]
  • birds wind farmMedia Blame Climate Change For Bird Die-Off, Ignore Wind And Solar Farms
    Jun 9, 2025
    Bird and butterfly populations are plummeting, but media outlets ignore wind and solar farms as possible culprits. […]
  • San Fran houses‘See You In Court’: Feds Threaten Legal Action Over California’s Pursuit Of Gas Appliance Bans
    Jun 9, 2025
    California’s U.S. attorney general warned regulators not to pass appliance rules that restrict domestic energy use, including natural gas. […]
  • alps stream waterStudy Finds Europe Was Warmer And Wetter For Most Of The Last 9,000 Years
    Jun 9, 2025
    New study shows Europe was warmer and wetter than almost any other period in the preindustrial Holocene. […]
  • Bullet Train in other country‘No Viable Way Forward’: DOT Audit Gives California High-Speed Rail Failing Grade
    Jun 9, 2025
    A federal DOT audit slams California's bullet train as mismanaged, overbudget, and years behind schedule—with funding now at risk. […]
  • Irrigation system watering cropsMeteorologist Rips NYTimes For Ignoring Real Data, Variability In ‘Thirstier Atmosphere’ Story
    Jun 9, 2025
    NYTimes blames droughts on a ‘thirstier’ atmosphere, but real-world data and natural climate drivers tell a very different story. […]
  • Seattle hot sunClimate Homicide? Lawyers Sue Big Oil For Woman’s Heat-Wave Death
    Jun 6, 2025
    Lawyers are using a woman’s heat-related death to push a climate change lawsuit against energy companies in Washington State. […]
  • summer bbqGermany’s Heat Hysteria: Authorities Recommend No Beer, Barbecues On Hot Days!
    Jun 6, 2025
    Germany’s heat-wave plan urges bans on beer, barbecues, and sports as officials ramp up hysterical warnings about summer health risks. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch