A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts ‘Consensus’ Science
During the first 10 months of 2017, 400 scientific papers have been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate’s fundamental control knob…or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related “consensus” positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media.
These 400 new papers support the position that there are significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes. Climate science is not settled.
Modern temperatures, sea levels, and extreme weather events are neither unusual nor unprecedented. Many regions of the Earth are cooler now than they have been for most of the last 10,000 years.
Natural factors such as the Sun (106 papers), multi-decadal oceanic-atmospheric oscillations such as the NAO, AMO/PDO, ENSO (37 papers), decadal-scale cloud cover variations, and internal variability, in general, have exerted a significant influence on weather and climate changes during both the past and present. Detecting a clear anthropogenic forcing signal amidst the noise of unforced natural variability may, therefore, be difficult.
And current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to the advocacy for renewables, are often costly, ineffective, and perhaps even harmful to the environment. On the other hand, elevated CO2 and a warmer climate provide unheralded benefits to the biosphere (i.e., a greener planet and enhanced crop yields).
In 2016, there were 500 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in scholarly journals (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) challenging “consensus” climate science. This amounts to more than 900 papers in less than two years.
Below are the two links to the list of 400 papers as well as the guideline for the lists’ categorization.
Read rest at No Tricks Zone
Hi admin, i must say you have high quality posts here.
Your blog should go viral. You need initial traffic boost only.
How to get it? Search for; make your content go viral Wrastain’s tools
The Elephant in the room is the Grand Solar Minimum, will it trigger a “Little Ice age in 2030 ? Will it be as extreme as the Maunder Minimum ? Comments greatly appreciated .
Providing for the facts that real facts have no meaning to Liberals,Globalists,Enviromentalists,Demacrats and the Useless Nations and they want skeptics sent to Concentration Camps/Gulags