For years, climate change “deniers” have been attacked and ridiculed because we don’t believe in the “science” of the left. [some emphasis, links added]
Yet, invented “science” isn’t science, and too many scientists have cowed to it, incentivized by money or fear of being cancelled, and have climbed on the bandwagon.
More and more people, however, are realizing the scam that’s been perpetrated and are speaking out.
And now, those who defend climate change caused by humans are furious and alarmed.
To discourage dissenters to the progressive narrative, the UN stepped up to stop the “disinformation”, intending to ramp up the war against climate change “deniers”:
“At the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), held in Brazil in November 2025, several states endorsed the UN’s ‘Declaration on Information Integrity on Climate Change, an initiative recognizing and trying to combat the rise in climate disinformation in media and politics.’
“The UN Declaration is professedly a pledge to ‘fight false information’ about climate change.
At first glance, the Declaration seems fairly innocuous. But if you read it carefully, it clearly condemns those who don’t agree with the UN agenda, demanding censorship of the opposition, largely through the media.
Here is one of the listed commitments:
“Promote and support the sustainability of a diverse and resilient media ecosystem through adequate policies to enable and ensure accurate and reliable coverage, specially, within this context, on climate and environmental issues, as well as policies on advertising transparency and accountability…”
It is not the place of the UN to determine a limitation on the discussion of climate change, or to create a media network to censor opposing viewpoints or findings.
And yet they persist in pursuing this agenda and insist that everyone fall in line.
Desiree Fixler, an expert in sustainable finance and investment banking and a former member of the WEF’s Global Future Council on Responsible Investing, turned whistleblower and identified the climate change crisis as a hoax:
“Fixler, a whistleblower, used to work as a sustainability officer for Deutsche Bank, until she exposed their ‘greenwashing’ and was fired for it. Since then, she has been exposing the climate change narrative and the ‘net zero’ agenda as a scam. In a recent podcast, she explained how the UN and WEF agendas of net zero emissions and ‘stakeholder capitalism’ – a WEF concept – are means to gain control and implement socialism. ‘They’re lying to the public,’ Fixler recently said on the Winston Marshall podcast.
” ‘They’ve manufactured a climate crisis. There is climate change, but there is no climate crisis… asset managers, consultants, and governments… they’re all in on it because they all profit from it.’ “
Last year, Stanford University reported on a “rise” in new organizations pushing back against the left’s “climate change crisis” claims:
“New Stanford-led research in PLOS One reveals a growing constellation of think tanks, research institutes, trade associations, foundations, and other groups actively working to oppose climate science and policy. The number of countries with at least one such ‘counter climate change organization’ has more than doubled over the past 35 years.”
The researchers, in a roundabout way, recognize the aggressiveness of the left’s climate change policies in action as a major factor for the pushback:
“According to the Jan. 22 study, the two factors most closely linked to the formation of at least one counter climate change organization are the strength of a country’s commitment to protecting the natural environment and the level of formal organization in its social sector.”
(As it turns out, people are less concerned with some unobservable boogeyman than they are with their utility bills and whether or not they can afford a car.)
An especially frustrating part of this story is that climate change adherents mischaracterize the position of the “deniers,” who don’t deny that the climate is changing, but that there is inadequate scientific evidence to suggest that human beings are the source of those changes.
Please stop with the scare tactics
Phrases like “climate breakdown” and “climate crisis” are not science
Their intent is to frighten, using panic to push poor policies
If you want to follow science, it is global warming or climate changehttps://t.co/yhPpXi9ENk pic.twitter.com/VD5cQ0SpWo
— Bjorn Lomborg (@BjornLomborg) September 7, 2023
This is a critical issue: How can we consider stopping climate change when we don’t have scientific data about what causes it?
Well-known scientists are finally speaking out against the UN censorship initiative:
“Prominent voices, including Bjorn Lomborg, have criticized the UN’s stance, insisting that taxpayer-funded climate policies warrant thorough scrutiny, not censorship.
“Lomborg contends that the UN’s agenda is not only misguided but runs the risk of economically damaging the very countries it claims to help, as evidenced by countries like Germany facing high energy costs amid aggressive climate goals.”
We must take seriously the efforts of the UN to censor scientific debate, because the consequences could be dire:
“The implications of this censorship extend far beyond the realm of energy policy, as it threatens foundational principles of democracy and free expression, calling into question the very nature of scientific and academic inquiry.”
The controversy and debate must continue!
Read more at American Thinker
