• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

The Dirty Truth About Open-Pit Mining For Greenland’s Rare Earth Minerals

by James Edward Kamis, guest post
September 01, 2022, 11:32 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
5

open pit miningMany believe that open-pit mining of Greenland’s rare earth metals is necessary to build and run electric cars, windmills, and solar panels.

Except open-pit mining of Greenland’s rare earth metals will have a far greater impact environmental impact than portrayed by the media, the United States Government, and mining companies.

I was one of two onsite geologists who aided in the expansion of Idaho’s huge open-pit Maybe Canyon Phosphate Mine. This experience taught me that it is difficult to appreciate the size and complex operations of a giant open-pit mine unless you have worked in one.

I am certain the public does not have any idea of the processes involved in open-pit mining. Like most products, the public thinks that rare earth metals magically appear.

They Don’t.

The photo below is Utah’s Kennicott open-pit copper mine, which is 2.5 miles wide, 0.75 miles deep, and has removed six billion tons of rock rich in copper.

Utah’s Open Pit Copper Mine, which is 2.5 miles wide, 0.75 feet deep, and has removed 6 billion tons of rock.

Copper is a rare earth metal so this mine is an excellent example of what an open-pit mine in Greenland would look like.

Operations of an open-pit mine

  1. Use chemicals that were taken from another mined area to explode solid rock areas of the mine.

  1. Use diesel-powered machines to reduce the size of large boulders created by the explosions.

diesel bulldozer

  1. Utilize multiple monster diesel-fueled trucks to haul off the crushed rock. Trucks that are built with iron extracted from another mine and rubber tires that are generated by processing oil. You need to drill wells, some in ocean areas, to produce oil.

  1. Build a diesel- or natural gas-fueled refinery plant. It is important to note that natural gas is composed of 90% methane. So, the refineries will emit huge amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Also, a rare earth metal plant needs 20 tons of water (150 trillion gallons of water) to make one ton of rare earth metals.

  1. Build a large reservoir capable of retaining vast amounts of mined waste rock.

  1. Construct a network of huge pipelines to transport mined waste rock to the mined waste-rock retaining reservoir.

  1. Ship the now concentrated metals to another processing plant that prepares the metals, which are placed in a renewable-energy device.

  1. Restore the mined area to its original state. This process uses monster trucks, graders, etc. So, the restoration process also has a large carbon footprint.

Potential Environmental Damage from the Open-Pit Mining Process

The process of open-pit mining Greenland’s rare earth metals will cause significant, unintended, and irreversible damage to Greenland’s physical and biological environments. Here are a few examples.

1. Scares on Pristine Coastlines.

2. Failure of Mine Waste Rock Retaining Lakes

Pictured above is the failure of Imperial Metals Mount Polley gold and copper mine waste-rock retaining-reservoir failure. This occurred in British Columbia, Canada, and it dumped 24 million cubic meters (more than 31 million cubic yards) of mine waste and sludge into neighboring Lake Polley and polluted the Hazeltine Creek watershed (above figure and here).

Through the years, thousands of waste-rock retaining reservoirs and lakes have failed. Mostly because when the mines are abandoned, they aren’t maintained. Failure of Greenland’s rare earth metal mines would empty into surrounding ocean areas and bays. Not good.

3. Radioactive Pollution

Greenland’s rare earth metal accumulations are very rich in radioactive uranium. In the not-so-distant past, Greenland was on the verge of opening a monster open-pit mine that contained significant amounts of uranium.

“Greenland may soon start building the world’s fifth-largest uranium mine and second-biggest rare earth operation, which could fuel independence dreams in the island, an “autonomous administrative division” within Denmark since 2009” ( see here ).

However, native Greenlanders strongly objected to the mining of radioactive-rich rocks near their hunting grounds and villages. The proposed mines are known to have high levels of radioactive rocks.

The quote below details the presence of radioactive rocks in the open-mining areas within Greenland.

“NOAH and Renewable Energy, another Danish NGO, list many serious environmental costs if the Kvanefjeld mine is allowed to proceed. There are huge risks from air pollution during open-cut mining and even greater risks associated with dumping radioactive waste in Lake Tareq. In addition to uranium, the radioactive waste would include thorium. Thorium tailings are 3‒10 times more radioactive than uranium, the two NGOs pointed out in their September 12 submission, responding to the mine’s latest Environmental Impact Statement. The tailings will cause health problems, even if the built-in dams behave as planned. The risk increases over time, primarily after the mine has been shut down and when monitoring and maintenance have been completed. In addition to the planned discharges, there will be unintentional spills via leaks and accidents. In the long run, large areas around the mine will be contaminated with radioactive elements and non-radioactive substances, many of which are highly toxic. The people living in the polluted areas will be permanently exposed to radioactive and other toxic substances via drinking water, food, and air. Seafood is also becoming polluted due to the massive discharges of waste, including wastewater, along the coast. Bioaccumulation of radionuclides and non-radioactive chemicals can become a serious problem. All this means that uranium mining in Kuannersuit in addition to significant chemical pollution will leave millions of tons of tailings containing some of the most toxic known radioactive substances, such as radium, thorium, radon, and polonium, and this waste remains radioactive at a dangerous level for hundreds of thousands of years. In addition, the Arctic environment is particularly vulnerable to pollution because it is rebuilding very slowly, and the long-term consequences of uranium mining could be extensive radioactive pollution, which, due to the health hazard, may make it necessary to ban agriculture, fishing, trapping, and livestock farming.” (see here).

4. Mercury Pollution

Research studies have proven that the rivers, ocean bays, and open ocean waters in the proposed Greenland mining areas have extremely high concentrations of natural mercury.

Mercury comes from bedrock layers that are mercury rich. Mercury is a rare earth mineral. If anything goes awry with the mining process, huge additional amounts of natural mercury will get dumped into Greenland’s seawater and freshwater systems.

“Unlike polluted rivers in other parts of the world, contaminated by industrial activity, the researchers believe the Greenland mercury is coming from natural sources. If it were coming from human pollution, then the snow on top of the ice sheet should also be full of mercury—yet previous studies have shown it’s comparatively clean. Instead, the scientists believe the meltwater mercury is probably leaching out of the bedrock beneath the ice. Mercury concentration in the meltwater rivers was at least an order of magnitude higher than the concentrations found in ordinary rivers across the Arctic. These concentrations became slightly diluted by the time they flowed out into the fjords—but were still higher than expected, the researchers say. Even after mingling with the salty water, the levels in the fjords remained about an order of magnitude higher than the mercury levels found in most open ocean waters” (see here).

Who Controls the World’s Despots of Rare Earth Metals

Prior to the 1980s, the United States was the world’s top owner of rare earth metals. Beginning in the 1980s, environmental groups began taking action to shut down all the United States’ rare earth mines, saying they were destroying the environment.

They succeeded.

By the middle of the 1990s, there was only one operating rare earth metal mine in the United States and this one is near abandonment. During this time, the United States gave up its legal right to own another country’s accumulations of rare earth metals.

These actions have had consequences.

China now owns 90% of the Earth’s rare earth metals. The recent tensions between China and the United States could result in them ending sales to the United States or greatly raising the sale price of its rare earth metals to the United States.

Also, when China’s economy recovers from the current worldwide financial slowdown, its economy will return to its fast-paced growth. This rapid growth will force China to use most of its rare earth supplies. As a result, China will reduce sales to the United States.

Also, China has done a very poor job of keeping their rare earth metal mines environmentally safe as seen in the photo below (see here).

Summary

This article is purposely loaded with numerous photos of open-pit mining operations for a reason. A picture tells a thousand words. Too often, recent media articles have used words and not pictures to convince the public that open-pit mining of Greenland’s rare earth metals will help save the environment.

It’s normal to believe that open-pit mining of many minerals is necessary to support human life.

However, it is also necessary to inform the public that open-pit mining is a very messy business. In fact, open-pit mining in Greenland may help mitigate destroying parts of the United States. This, though, will be at the expense of damaging Greenland’s pristine environment.


James Edward Kamis is a Geologist with a B.S. in geology from Northern Illinois University and an M.S. in geology from Idaho State University who has always been fascinated by the connection between Geology and Climate. More than forty-four years of research/observation have convinced him that the Earth’s Heat Flow Engine, which drives the outer crustal plates, is also an important driver of the Earth’s climate. The Plate Climatology Theory (plateclimatology.com) was recently presented at the annual 2016 American Metrological Society Conference in New Orleans, LA. (see here)

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    Biden forcing us al to drive EV is just more proof he runs on Poltics not facts Clinton and Obamas did about the same thing as well

  2. Randy Verret says:
    3 years ago

    Good article. Like any extractive industry, there are ALWAYS environmental impacts & attendant “trade-offs.” Rare earth mining is nio different. No frree lunch in this line of work…

    • Steve Bunten says:
      3 years ago

      Lots of good stuff in here on the problems with mining any metal that we use in our modern society. But not at all comprehending him calling copper a rare earth metal. It is not. But the extraction of copper and any other metal used by our modern society requires mining a huge amount of ore that then has to be processed to get to the metal of interest. And it requires, as he says, a lot of fossil fuels, something our ignorant politicians don’t seem to know or don’t care–just wave a magic wand and the metal appears.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Twenty Years Later, An Inconvenient Truth Fails to Hold UpTwenty Years On, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ Thoroughly Debunked
    Jan 15, 2026
    Twenty years later, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ predictions, from Kilimanjaro to glaciers, have failed to materialize. […]
  • bbcBBC Pushes 12% Pay Cut Claim Built On Hypothetical Models, Not Actual Data
    Jan 15, 2026
    BBC claims climate change is cutting U.S. pay by 12%. A meteorologist shows why the data tells a very different story. […]
  • Kamala Harris seaside mansionKamala Buys $8M Malibu Mansion Despite Her Climate Warnings About Rising Seas
    Jan 15, 2026
    Kamala buys $8.2M Malibu mansion near beaches she warned could flood from rising seas and extreme weather. […]
  • sun hazeWhy Blotting Out The Sun Borders On Climate Madness
    Jan 15, 2026
    When green groups try to block the sun, the risks to wildlife, crops, and climate show the sheer folly of solar geoengineering. […]
  • homeowners insurance policy court gavelBlue States Push Climate Liability Bills That Would Hike Costs For Consumers
    Jan 15, 2026
    Blue states are pushing climate liability bills that could make homeowners pay more while targeting energy companies. […]
  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS Weighs Whether Oil Companies Can Shift Climate Lawsuits To Federal Court
    Jan 14, 2026
    Justices weighed whether oil companies can move climate lawsuits to federal court, while warning of a potential exodus from state tort cases. […]
  • hurricane media alarmismData Show Hurricanes Not More Frequent Or Intense, Refuting Alarmist Media Claims
    Jan 14, 2026
    Observational data show hurricanes aren’t stronger or more frequent, refuting alarmist media claims based on fake climate attribution models. […]
  • nuclear plant illinoisTrump’s Nuclear Push Wins On Efficiency, Costs, And Scale—Climate Benefits Are Secondary
    Jan 14, 2026
    WaPo is right: Trump’s nuclear push boosts efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness—climate benefits are secondary. […]
  • bill mckibbenBill McKibben’s Alarmist Misfire: What Midterm Voters Actually Care About
    Jan 14, 2026
    Fear-based climate messaging won’t sway 2026 voters. Here’s what candidates actually need to say about energy and the environment. […]
  • climate past presentEarth’s Climate Cycles Are Ancient—The Global Warming Agenda Isn’t
    Jan 14, 2026
    Earth’s climate has always shifted, but the Left treats global warming as a permanent political weapon—history be damned. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky