• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Thanks To Biden, China And Big Business Are The Biggest Winners At COP26

by Aynsley Kellow
November 12, 2021, 8:03 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
1

xi jinping joe bidenThe key development at Glasgow on Wednesday 10 November was probably the announcement of a US-China Joint Glasgow Declaration on Enhancing Climate Action in the 2020s.

This seemingly took Boris Johnson by surprise, because he had just expressed pessimism about the progress on negotiations, and seemingly he was not notified of the impending announcement.

The Declaration has been reported by the mainstream media in Australia as if it were some marvelous breakthrough in negotiations.

Journalists seem to have forgotten (or perhaps they never knew) that President Obama also issued a joint statement on climate change with Xi Jinping in 2015,  just before the Paris Agreement.

This was also just before a massive expansion in Chinese construction of coal-fired power stations both domestically and abroad. Those abroad were facilitated by Obama forcing restrictions on the World Bank, preventing it from financing them, opening the field for China.

Nine Entertainment (The Age/SMH) even managed to get the contents of the Declaration wrong, stating that:

‘Crucially, the statement notes both countries are committed to the Paris Agreement goal of limiting temperature rises to 1.5 degrees…’

In fact, the document read:

‘The two sides also recall the Agreement’s aim in accordance with Article 2 to hold the global average temperature increase to well below 2 degrees C and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 degrees C.’

This was in accordance with the Chinese making it quite clear in Glasgow that the 2°C must remain, and to remove it would break the consensus (perhaps the Nine journalists should have subscribed to this Bulletin, where it has been explained a number of times).

The Declaration had all the hallmarks of a symbolic gesture to give the appearance of action, and China committed to nothing but to cooperate in the future and its ‘commitments’ were vague in the extreme.

While it recorded that ‘The United States has set a goal to reach 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035’ this was reciprocated with ‘China will phase down coal consumption during the 15th Five-Year Plan and make best efforts to accelerate this work.’

Making all those solar panels and wind turbines for the USA will doubtless make that more difficult.

Both countries have declared an intention to ‘communicate’ new Nationally Determined Contributions for 2035 in 2025. Of course, President Xi might well expect a change of US administrations in the 2024 elections, so they are promising little.

Both have promised to ’work cooperatively to complete at COP26 the implementing arrangements (“rulebook”) for Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement, as well as common time frames for NDCs.

So, despite the hyperbole, the Declaration represents little of substance, and it is worth remembering that Biden publicly criticized Xi for not turning up in Glasgow despite knowing (unless he was unaware) that the Declaration had been under negotiation since April and strategic tensions with China persist.

The outlook for a meaningful outcome remains pessimistic. The key remains meeting the finance requirements of the developing countries.

India has now put a deadline on its demand for $1 trillion, which it has now made it clear it wants by 2030. It seeks this amount to fund the deployment of renewables, energy storage, decarbonization of the industrial sector, and spending on adaptation to defending infrastructure on a warming planet.

Prime Minister Modi announced that India would increase its non-fossil fuel energy capacity to 500 GW by 2030; meet 50% of its energy requirements from renewable energy sources by 2030; reduce its total carbon emissions by one billion tons by 2030; reduce the carbon intensity of its economy by 45% by 2030; achieve net zero emissions by 2070.

But India wants the money to finance this, and a delegate has made it clear that ‘India will not update its NDC till there is clarity.’

It remains to be seen whether the financial sector will come to the party. One notable feature at Glasgow has been the willingness of businesses to step up to the plate, especially those companies focused on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting.

Pressure from investment funds and groups like Climate Action 100+, an investor group with 545 members managing a combined $52 trillion of assets, have driven much of this.

We have seen some divestment of coal assets by corporations such as BHP, Rio Tinto, and Anglo American, but the important thing to note is that they are not closing coal mines, but simply seeking to remove them from their portfolios.

In other words, they are insulating themselves from ESG pressures rather than helping avoid climate change by ceasing mining coal.

Earlier this year, BHP sought to extend the life of its Mt Arthur mine by 20 years, while also seeking a buyer, making it clear that the object was to remove it from its balance sheet rather than reduce emissions.

The investor group Market Forces was quickly onto this and demanded they close the mine rather than sell it.

When Rio and BHP sold their shares in a Colombian mine, they were purchased by Glencore, which sought and received the blessing of Climate Action, in return for promising to improve its future climate goals.

Mt Arthur mine in NSW

The activist financial groups are in fact now concerned at the consequences, unforeseen by them but very foreseeable, that their success in forcing the ESG-sensitive corporations to divest just moves ownership of coal mines by those less sensitive about saving the planet and, lacking a global presence, less vulnerable to pressure from the activist funds.

There is, in fact, finance available for coal – just not finance maximally vulnerable to ESG activism.

This has been exemplified by the way in which Anglo American has responded ­ by placing its South African coal assets in a spinoff company, Thungela Resources Ltd, which was handed to its existing shareholders to do with their equity as they wished, and with a senior Anglo executive appointed as CEO.

Corporations that are active in a single jurisdiction not only enjoy considerable structural power to influence their government but are also less vulnerable to attacks on their reputation than global players.

Regarding the motivation of the corporations, we should also bear in mind that the resource requirements of renewables (steel, cement, copper, etc) promise massive revenues for the likes of BHP and Rio, so selling (not closing) coal mines to free up cash for investments in such commodities is also good for business.

Boris Johnson went out on a limb with Glasgow and has risked considerable political capital on an outcome that (when crunched in the ‘models’) limits warming to 1.5°C.

That outcome remains very much in doubt, at a time when he finds his government embroiled in political scandal and facing an inconvenient energy crisis that has made something of a mockery of his planned shift to renewable energy.

He even ran into criticism for the hypocrisy of taking a private jet rather than a train back to London for a dinner.

No doubt, some text will be developed and cobbled together, not by the deadline of 6 pm Friday, but after the usual late-night negotiation on the last day.

Whether it amounts to much and whether it is implemented is in serious doubt, but – like Chamberlain returning from Munich – Boris will return afterward to London clutching something on paper. The only thing in doubt will be whether he catches a train or flies.

Read more at Climate Change The Facts

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 1

  1. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    As the article pointed out, President Obama also issued a joint statement on climate change with Xi Jinping in 2015. Since that time China has built hundreds of new coal fired power plants. We can be very sure that after the latest US-China Joint Glasgow Declaration that China will build hundreds more new coal fired power plants.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • COP30 Amazon17 Republican AGs Urge Trump Admin To Skip COP30 Over Green Energy Policies
    Oct 24, 2025
    The attorneys general say attending COP30 would back costly, unreliable wind and solar and risk U.S. energy security. […]
  • severe storm over cityClimate Expert Reveals Latest Scandal Tied To Billion-Dollar Disasters
    Oct 24, 2025
    Climate Central takes over the Billion-Dollar Disasters tabulation, sparking fresh controversy over its methods and motives. […]
  • ocean sun cloudsNew Study Finds 75% Of Rising Ocean Heat Likely Natural, CO2 Not A Factor
    Oct 24, 2025
    Study shows ocean warming driven mostly by natural cycles, not greenhouse gas emissions, challenging mainstream global warming narratives. […]
  • LNG terminal in germanyU.S. And Qatar Push Back On EU’s Climate Mandates That Threaten LNG Exports
    Oct 24, 2025
    U.S. and Qatari officials warn that the EU’s latest climate regulations under CSDDD could endanger Europe’s access to affordable natural gas. […]
  • marines trainingCrazy Hill Op-Ed Demands Generals Respond To Climate Change ‘National Security’ Threat
    Oct 23, 2025
    The Hill warns of climate Armageddon unless U.S. generals join the fight against ‘Mother Nature,’ now deemed a national security threat. […]
  • Shipping port near power plantEurope’s Energy Crisis Shows Net Zero Dogma Comes At A Cost
    Oct 23, 2025
    While China’s rare earth threat exposes U.S. supply chain risks, Europe’s energy crisis shows how net zero policies backfired spectacularly. […]
  • wind farm climate outDemocrats Ditch Climate Messaging As Rising Utility Costs Hit Voters
    Oct 23, 2025
    As Democrats struggle with climate messaging, voters feel the pinch from rising utility bills and the party's costly green energy policies. […]
  • Protest system change not climate changeLead Attorney Admits Real Goal Of Climate Lawsuits: Backdoor Carbon Tax
    Oct 23, 2025
    A top lawyer spearheading climate lawsuits says the quiet part out loud: litigation is a backdoor carbon tax on oil companies and consumers. […]
  • WMO reportHow The World Meteorological Organization Lies To You—Using Your Taxes
    Oct 22, 2025
    The WMO’s 2025 greenhouse gas report hides key data that undercuts the so-called climate 'crisis' narrative—funded by your tax dollars. […]
  • Hurricane generating ocean waves2025 Hurricane Season Is Flopping As Alarmist Predictions Fail
    Oct 22, 2025
    The 2025 hurricane season so far has seen no major U.S. landfalls, exposing alarmists’ failed predictions of catastrophic storms. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky