• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Renewables, And China’s Takeover Of Australia’s Power Grid

by Mark Latham
May 13, 2021, 10:20 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
8

aussie wind farmAs China expands its influence globally under the Belt and Road program, renewable energy is a big priority.

The world’s largest wind-turbine manufacturer, the Chinese-owned Goldwind, has a growing presence in Australian wind and solar farms, especially in Victoria (under Chairman Dan Andrews) but also in NSW under Energy Minister Matt Kean.

The Goldwind model is all good for China and all bad for Australia.

As an energy source, the company’s windmills and solar farms are making our manufacturing industries less viable, while in China, Goldwind is using huge volumes of thermal and coking coal to produce the wind towers and solar panels they send to Australia.

They are using the natural resource (coal) that our governments are trying to kill off, to create millions of jobs in their country as we deindustrialize ours.

It’s an example of economic self-harm, with Australia exporting mining and manufacturing jobs to China.

Every day, in the politburo’s energy office somewhere in Beijing, they must be laughing their heads off.

Goldwind is a Chinese state-owned company run by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Its founder Wu Gang is a long-standing CCP member and was a deputy to the 12th National People’s Congress.

Goldwind was established in the 1980s. The CCP owned it outright until it was listed on the stock market. Now its top investors are Chinese state-owned corporations, which is just a different form of CCP control.

Whereas the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei has been subject to extensive political scrutiny, Goldwind’s activities have largely slipped under the radar. Yet there’s no doubt that international renewable energy investments are an integral part of China’s Belt and Road ambitions.

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis reports that between 2015 and 2021, the Chinese installed 40 percent of all wind energy worldwide and 36 percent of solar.

They have matching aspirations for this kind of dominance in pumped hydro, electric vehicles, and battery production. The Brookings Institution has said that ‘China has become the center of gravity for the global energy market’.

At a time when Australia’s relationship with China has deteriorated sharply and our national security is at risk, why are our governments sleepwalking into increased Chinese control of our electricity grid? If the Port of Darwin is important, the power grid is doubly so.

How can a country defend itself if another nation controls its essential electricity infrastructure and supply?

Goldwind is spearheading China’s drive to own and manage large parts of Australia’s power network. It already has dozens of assets on its books.

One of its strategies is to buy wind farms after local companies have secured development approvals, thereby avoiding community concern about Chinese control during the EIS and final consent stages.

This happened at the Gullen Range Wind Farm on the NSW Southern Tablelands in 2011, when Goldwind stepped in to purchase the development consent and built the necessary wind towers (using Chinese products, of course).

Ditto the same process in 2014 when Goldwind bought out the massive 119-wind tower White Rock development near Glen Innes, NSW. Double ditto three years later when it purchased the 300 MW Yass Valley (Coppabella) Wind Farm project consent.

In these three cases, Goldwind’s acquisitions were from an Australian company called Epuron, which seems to specialize in site identification, land leases, transmission planning, and public consultation for wind farm developments, before on-selling to China’s Goldwind.

Epuron’s leading wind farm engineer is Keer Huang, who has been a member of the China Entrepreneur Club since 2014. From 2018 to 2020 he worked for Goldwind as its site engineer.

Currently, Epuron has 11 more wind farm proposals underway, one of which is the Bowmans Creek development, east of Muswellbrook in the Hunter Valley.

Public feedback on the EIS for this 60-wind tower, 17,000-hectare monstrosity closed last Tuesday, 11 May. It’s a sprawling overbuilt development impacting heavily on regional landscapes and agriculture, mainly beef cattle grazing.

The local residents’ action group, Stop The Spin, has said, ‘The community does not and will never support the industrialization of our beautiful mountains surrounding the Hunter Valley.’

From what I can see, the possibility of another wind farm sale to Goldwind is not mentioned in Epuron’s presentational documents for the project.

When I asked Energy Minister Matt Kean on the parliamentary Notice Paper about the national security implications of Chinese companies taking over NSW’s electricity grid, he said it was a matter for the federal government.

Hopefully, Goldwind is on the list of Chinese companies Foreign Minister Marise Payne is re-examining, following her cancellation of Victoria’s Belt and Road deal.

Kean has a manic determination to reach 100 percent renewables under his so-called Electricity Roadmap, having announced last month that NSW needs to get out of all fossil fuel use (coal, gas, and oil) by 2035.

He doesn’t seem concerned by the extent of Chinese ownership. Last year he even gave Goldwind a $10 million grant to expand its energy operations in NSW.

That’s right, the NSW Government is funding the Chinese Communist Party and its corporate subsidiaries to take over our electricity grid.

The Port of Darwin is the Teddy Bear’s Picnic compared to this act of folly.

Read more at Spectator AU

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 8

  1. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    Let’s dream. What should happen is enough people in Australia will get fed up with the high cost and unreliability of renewable energy that the government will reverse course. That would not only be ending subsidies but permitting utilities to back out of contracts with the providers of renewable energy. All of those windmills owned by the Chinese would then we worthless. We can at least fantasize.

    Reply
  2. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    Land previously owned by a relatively early Australian conservation-minded farmer is now smothered by Chinese solar panels made, quite possibly, with the power from Australian coal.

    That’s no win for the environment or for Australia, rather a significant step backwards. Selling our coal just to buy wind turbines and solar panels is downright crazy.

    That trade unions support this craziness is an indictment on their ethics.

    Reply
    • Gumnut says:
      4 years ago

      There are industry (union supported) superannuation ads whereby you hold your hands in a square to symbolise your superannuation is growing faster than someone else’s. When I see that square, I see wind turbine blades not spinning, yet still blowing subsidy cash in.

      I must be a contrarian.

      Reply
  3. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    During the height of the Cold War a study concluded that a 9 mm handgun made in Poland would be the best choice for the US military. The US military was smart enough not to rely on a side arm made in a country that was a potential adversity. It appears that those in Australia have much less intelligence. Even though armed conflict isn’t likely there is definitely economic conflict.

    Reply
    • Jerry Katell says:
      4 years ago

      I have studied and continue to study the subject of global warming/climate change for 17 years. I doubt there has ever been a propaganda campaign that has succeeded as well as this. The best climatologists in the world, who are not on the take, have shown conclusively that there is no correlation between CO2 levels and heating or cooling and that there is no manmade climate crisis. It is a religion now with no scientific basis and with actual results never anything like the predictions of the phony models. I don’t know how this madness can be stopped. It probably can’t since it is being driven into the minds of the children, the next generation. Truly a tragedy.

      Reply
      • Dave of Reedy Creek, Qld. Aus. says:
        4 years ago

        Totally agree with you Jerry. I have been on the trail of this monumental fraud for over 20 years. It is all about money, power and control. How can western society survive in such an appallingly lopsided situation that we have now with the world’s two most densely populated countries. China and India are free to do anything they like and are big enough to do it, recent data says China’s emissions are now as much or more than the rest of the world. As for the rest of us; we are destroying our economies with faith in wind and solar while totally defacing our landscapes. When one considers the material in the base of one turbine alone which will remain as a blot permanently it make shivers run down my spine. What are we thinking? Neither turbines or solar panels are recyclable as well. What a mess this is and all on concocted lies.

        Reply
  4. Coeur de Lion says:
    4 years ago

    Note that President Xi wants the Paris Agreement to survive because of the harm done to ‘western’ economies so therefore supports it with his cynical promise to be ‘neutral’ by 2060 ho ho ho. Our lefties praise him for that.

    Reply
  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    China wants it all the share of the World Cake they take the whole thing

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • 1930S Dust BowlBloomberg’s Climate Alarm Misfires: U.S. Heat Records Show 1930s Still Hottest
    Oct 10, 2025
    New data challenges Bloomberg’s heat claims, showing U.S. temp records peaked in the 1930s, not the modern era, despite climate alarmist narratives. […]
  • Rinderknecht facebook postSuspected Pacific Palisades Firebug Ranted Online About Trump, Climate Change
    Oct 10, 2025
    The alleged firebug behind the Pacific Palisades fire ranted online about climate change, Trump, Antarctic ice, and plant-based diets. […]
  • Solar panel farmBLM Cancels Mammoth Nevada Solar Project Under Trump’s Energy Agenda
    Oct 10, 2025
    BLM pulled the plug on a massive Nevada solar power project amid the Trump administration’s crackdown on renewable energy projects. […]
  • North Sea Wind FarmScientists Warn EU’s Net Zero Push Fueling Green Colonialism In Poor Countries
    Oct 10, 2025
    Scientists warn the green energy push risks exploiting developing nations, draining resources, and worsening global inequality under climate action. […]
  • Leonardo DiCaprio and his megayacht‘Green Antoinettes’ Preach Sacrifice While Jetting Off In Luxury
    Oct 10, 2025
    From Leo DiCaprio to AOC, celebs and politicians moralize about climate austerity while jetting off in luxury, fueling public backlash. […]
  • city underwaterYahoo News Pushes False Claim Cape Coral Will Vanish Under Rising Seas
    Oct 9, 2025
    Yahoo News amplified a false claim that Cape Coral will vanish under rising seas, ignoring NOAA tide data showing only a modest, steady sea level trend. […]
  • Santa Ynez Reservoir and hydrantLAFD After-Action Report Omits Empty Reservoir’s Role In Palisades Fire
    Oct 9, 2025
    LAFD’s Palisades Fire report cites firefighting issues but leaves out how the empty Santa Ynez Reservoir worsened the disaster. […]
  • Palisades FireDemocrats, Media Falsely Blamed Deadly California Fire On Climate Change—It Was Arson
    Oct 9, 2025
    The Feds say a man intentionally set the Palisades Fire, undermining claims from Democrats and media that climate change and oil companies were to blame. […]
  • Pope ice blessingPope Leo’s Arctic Ice Blessing Eroding Church’s Spiritual Mandate
    Oct 8, 2025
    Pope Leo’s Arctic ice blessing exposed how diving into climate politics erodes the Church’s spiritual authority and aligns it with radical agendas. […]
  • Offshore oil rigFederal Judge Rules Biden’s Massive Offshore Oil And Gas Ban Was Illegal
    Oct 8, 2025
    A federal judge ruled Biden overstepped his authority when he blocked offshore oil and gas drilling across 625 million acres, overturning his permanent ban. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky