Until recently, many California leftists claimed that their Great Leader, Democrat Governor Jerry Brown, had created a surplus for his loving people.
Perhaps they felt it was a way to show conservative Republicans that a government could be known as a leftie stronghold while balancing budgets.
There’s just one problem with this, something that was revealed last year by Hans Bader, of CNS news, and is now being exposed even further.
Turns out, the great “surplus” became a deficit when 2016 spending numbers were “discovered” to have been undercounted by $1.9 billion, and, this week, the Brown government revealed that the magical “bullet train” being built by the government between Los Angeles and San Francisco will run, get this, an estimated $77.9 billion by the time the first few trains might possibly run in 2029.
That’s an increase of $13 billion from estimates provided two years ago.
The price of the California bullet train project jumped sharply Friday when the state rail authority announced that the cost of connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco would be $77.3 billion and could rise as high as $98.1 billion — an uptick of at least $13 billion from estimates two years ago.
Can you imagine a private company doing this? Of course not. But the California government can take people’s money without asking them to voluntarily offer it; they can take the cash through taxation, which Brown and his allies have been doing, seemingly with pride.
Just last year, Jerry signed a bill that increased gas taxes and vehicle fees by $5.2 billion annually, and many residents believed the money would be reserved for highway and bridge repairs.
But as Republican California State Assemblymember Melissa Melendez noted last year, nearly 30% is not being used on roads and bridges.
Some is being spent on university projects, some for job training for felons, and some for parks, to name just a few divergences. Oh, and then there’s the money that will go towards, yeah, you got it, trains.
Yet this group of politicians wants to shell out between $77.3 and $98.1 billion on a “high speed” rail system between the City of Angels and the Gate City of San Fran.
No wonder businesses and residents have been fleeing the state in droves.
But this is not just a run-of-the-mill example of bad governance or legislative tomfoolery that should be lined up beside so many others in the US and world history.
This story includes in it a historical and economic lesson we can learn, and that lesson is about public rail projects.
Guess what?
Public rail is always, without exception, a loser. From the time of the boondoggle “Transcontinental Railway” that was years over time and millions over budget thanks to government cronyism.
And this tradition has not stopped. As I noted in my book, “Live Free or Die”, when factoring for tax subsidies and loans, no public rail line in history has run in the black.
In fact, almost anyone familiar with how politicians and special interests work can note that rail projects are ways to force taxpayers who don’t live near the lines and will likely not use them to subsidize rail users, rail builders, and employees, and business interests located near the rail stops.
The story hasn’t changed since the days of the Transcontinental Railroad when workers would knowingly plant rails on permafrost, aware that the land would shift in the spring, and they would be able to charge more to the feds for conducting the repairs.
If a rail line is a good economic investment, there is no need to subsidize it. If there is a market for the transportation, customers will be attracted, and private investors will line up to loan start-up cash.
In fact, this is precisely what happened during the time of the Transcontinental Railroad.
What many Americans don’t know is that while the feds were bungling and pocketing huge collections of taxpayer money for themselves, the privately run Great Northern Railway successfully beat the government at its own game, creating a transcontinental rail under time and on budget.
Nothing in politics changes.
But it’s important to look at the contemporary stories and try not to get frustrated. Rather, we can use them as catapults to go back into history and learn, then spread that information to others…
…Even as collectivists tell us how “financially responsible” they are in places like California.
Read more at MRCtv
The Chattanooga Choo Choo,The Orage Blossem Special,The Wabash Cannonball,The City of new Orleans,The Soul Train and the A Train all going somewhere the Moonbeam Pork Train going nowhere
Moonbeam wants his high speed Choo Choo so he can move more illegal aliens(Future Democratic Voters)all over the state
Date of opening 2029.
Moonbeam will be dead by then. [maybe]
SF and LA will only have homeless people riding back and forth as all the businesses will be gone.. ;^D
For some reasons politicians like Gerry Brown do have a very good sense for when the barn door is going to knock them on their ass
and conveniently slip out just before the event .
California is the new fly over country. Businesses are cowards they only go where they are welcome . They are welcome in California
to be over regulated , taxed to death , and now charged if they help uphold the law with respect to illegal immigrants. ICE is considered the enemy and tent cities are all the rage . Well done Gerry Clown .
$98 billion to be spent by a near bankrupt State .
No wonder the exodus is accelerating .
It’s know as FUFO in the UK, f*ck up and f*ck off!
Ontario has much in common with the UK.
There’s gold at the end of the career arc for socialist leaders.
Gator, I remember you posting this information before and I’m glad you have done so again. Note that your calculations are based on $68.4 billon and now the project is up to $77.9 billon.
I’ll repeat what I have said before. I was living sixty miles south of San Francisco during the BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit, a rail system) project. The projected ended costing a hundred times more than the voters were told when they approved it. My uncle is a civil engineer for the federal government. At the time one of the main motivations for public transportation was to save energy. My uncle had access to a federal study that estimated BART would have to be used for fifty years to break even with the energy required to build the system.
I ran figures a few years ago…
The California High-Speed Rail Authority has estimated the project’s year-of-expenditure cost at $68.4 billion (2011 estimate).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_RailWikipedia
SFO to LAX Round-trip = $137
http://www.orbitz.com/flights/from-San_Francisco-to-Los_Angeles.o4468.d4309/
499,270,073 Tickets
More than 6 million people fly between the Los Angeles basin and San Francisco Bay per year
http://cahsr.blogspot.com/2009/10/la-sf-nations-second-busiest-air-route.html
For round trip, cut that in half to 3 million.
So my back of the envelope figures show that for the cost of building the high speed rail, you could fly everyone for free for roughly 166 years.
Of course most projects like this can double in actual cost.
But who is counting?
I am. Now we can fly everyone for over 238 years.