An Obama-appointed judge in Montana dismissed with prejudice a high-profile lawsuit a group of 22 children brought against the Trump administration, accusing it of pursuing energy policies that will worsen global warming and, as a result, threaten their lives. [emphasis, links added]
The plaintiffs argued that three energy-focused executive orders President Trump signed shortly after taking office violate their Fifth Amendment rights to life and liberty by worsening pollution that threatens their health and futures.
They said the actions escalate “climate-related dangers” and infringe upon their rights to personal security.
Their complaint asked the federal district court in Montana to block implementation of the executive orders, something that would have potentially erased hundreds of policies that a dozen separate federal agencies have announced since Trump took office.
In effect, the complaint sought to reverse Trump’s energy agenda.
John Podesta, who oversaw former President Joe Biden’s climate agenda, testified before the court in support of the lawsuit as an “expert witness” last month.
During his nearly two-hour testimony, Podesta argued Trump’s orders are illegal, took personal digs at Trump, and blasted federal policies benefiting the oil industry, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
In his order on Wednesday, however, Judge Dana Christensen wrote that the lawsuit “amounts to hundreds of lawsuits” that have been bundled into a single case. He said the courts lack the authority to block the executive orders.
“While this court is certainly troubled by the very real harms presented by climate change and the [executive orders’] effect on carbon dioxide emissions, this concern does not automatically confer upon it the power to act,” he wrote.
“Plaintiffs are effectively asking that this court order the United States to return to the environmental policy of the previous administration,” Christensen continued, noting that such an injunction would not prevent the Trump administration from still pursuing its agenda to prioritize fossil fuels and suppress green energy using other means.
The ruling is a setback for climate activists who hoped the case could dismantle Trump’s efforts to boost oil, gas, and coal production while rolling back policies favoring the green energy industry.
It’s also a black eye for Podesta, whose attempt to thwart the Trump administration appears to have fallen flat.
The Oregon-based left-wing nonprofit Our Children’s Trust filed the lawsuit on behalf of the 22 child plaintiffs in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana in May 2025.
Lead plaintiff Eva Lighthiser, a 19-year-old hiker, said at the time that Trump’s executive orders are a “death sentence for my generation.”
Top image: President Trump signing executive orders in the Oval Office by Daniel Torok, The White House, United States Government Work
Read rest at Free Beacon
Who knew that Podesta is an “expert witness”! I didn’t know he had any kind of scientific degree to bestow on him the moniker of “expert witness”. Thankfully this judge saw through the ruse and dismissed it with prejudice meaning they can’t re-litigate the dismissal.
These law suits are an attempt to by pass democracy and implement the liberal agenda. President Trump was campaigned on a pro-energy platform and was elected by the democratic process. The 22 children lawsuit attempts to over ride the democracy.