More than three decades ago, Congress launched an initiative called the U.S. Global Change Research Program [USGCRP]. Today, it spends billions of dollars a year empowering liberal climate scientists to spread climate change doom. [emphasis, links added]
The government group says its role is to provide the “scientific foundation to support informed decision-making across the United States” on climate change.
It’s done so by producing five National Climate Assessment reports, considered the “crown jewel” of climate research.
Despite taking funding from at least ten separate government agencies, producing the report seems to be the group’s sole function.
The most recent iteration—published in 2023 and still prominently showcased on its government website—warns that “severe climate risks to the United States will continue to grow.”
The next report is due out in the next couple of years, according to E&E News.
The National Climate Assessment is not simply an intellectual exercise, but rather one that carries real policy might.
Congress and agencies use it to justify regulations and funding decisions, and states and cities across the country lean on it as the non-partisan scientific foundation for their climate action plans.
In summary, it is the scientific bedrock for directing policy at all levels of government towards liberal climate change goals.
While the USGCRP states on its website that it has a budget of $4.95 billion in 2025, it only lists two full-time employees. So, who’s getting paid to put the massive and consequential report together?
Sources familiar with past iterations of the National Climate Assessment say the work is largely outsourced to a group called ICF, a massive government contractor that has an active contract to work on the report.
The Daily Wire identified at least one active contract from NASA for ICF to “support” the USGCRP.
ICF is set to be paid millions of dollars during the Trump administration to “assist the nation and the world to understand, assess, predict, and respond to human-induced and natural processes of global change.”
The contract was first announced in June 2021 and described as a $34 million five-year contract to help with the National Climate Assessments.
Only $18 million has been paid out, according to the government spending database. But with another assessment on deck and ICF under contract for another year, the additional $16 million could be disbursed in the next year.
A climate scientist who has worked on the National Climate Assessment in the past says ICF runs the show, virtually controlling the entire USGCRP.
“By providing all staff for the USGCRP, a federal agency, the ICF exerts undue influence over the global change narrative and priorities presented by the federal government,” said the official, who requested anonymity to discuss the work.
“The ICF, through the USGCRP, exerts an undue influence on the production of the National Climate Assessment every four years. [Except for] its Executive Director and the Director of the National Climate Assessment, the ICF supplies all staff associated with the USGCRP.”
Those two positions mentioned by the climate official are the only two employees listed on the USGCRP staff list: a director of the National Climate Assessment named Ariela Zycherman and a deputy director for services named Heidi Roop.
A top Trump administration official, Russell Vought, has signaled that he wanted to exert more oversight over the next climate assessment. Vought runs the powerful Office of Management and Budget and has openly stated that he wants to make deep cuts to “woke and weaponized” spending.
Vought has specifically called out the USGCRP’s report, arguing that the bureaucrats who write it end up with outsized power over government action. He’s called for an investigation of the political leanings of the contractors that assemble the report.
Both staffers listed by the USGCRP appear to be highly partisan actors. Last year, Zycherman contributed to the presidential campaigns of both Joe Biden and then-VP Kamala Harris, according to campaign finance records.
Roop has her pronouns in her Instagram bio and describes herself as a “climate scientist focused on preparing for a warmer world.”
And ICF is an incredibly partisan firm.
Its website boasts about its “corporate citizenship,” “culture and belonging,” and “environmental justice.”
Several blogs are posted on its site about how to infuse “equity” into “climate discussions,” support EV mandates, and advance “environmental justice.”
Perhaps most telling, nearly all of the officials its website lists as being part of the ICF Climate Team are Democrat donors, giving to candidates including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
The Daily Wire was unable to spot any contributions to Republicans.
ICF takes in far more in government contracts than its active $34 million from NASA.
An analysis of federal spending data found that the consulting firm rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars each year through federal contracts and took in over $2 billion during the Biden administration.
The consulting firm is likely aware that the scope of its government work could be slashed during Trump’s term, and so are investors.
Its stock price was at $171 a share days ahead of last November’s election but has since cratered to just $77 a share, the lowest it had been since the last time Trump was president.
Read rest at Daily Wire
I Agree with SP’s comment – 100%
If anything to add – I would request that that whole Climate Bureaucracy
GET Completely DISMANTLED before Trump leaves office!
Just another Government Burracracy that needs to be defunded by 100%