I am a geologist which means I have rocks in my head and some of those rocks have recorded the climate history of Earth. Here is their story.
We will start with the big picture.
The graphic below [after the jump] shows the estimated temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) content for the past 600 million years. [emphasis, links added]
The blue line is the estimated temperature; the black line is the estimated CO2 content of the atmosphere.
Notice that for much of the past 600 million years, the temperature has been about 12°C warmer than it is now and life has flourished. (Note that the climate crazies claim that if the global temperature increases by 2°C above present, we will die.)
The dips in the temperature curve are ice ages. Ice ages have occurred on a cycle of about 145 million years. Ice ages consist of glacial epochs and warmer interglacial periods. We are now in an interglacial period. (In the popular vernacular, glacial epochs are often called “ice ages.”)
The glacial epoch cycle happens whenever our solar system, in its travels around the center of our galaxy, goes through some spiral arms of the galaxy with very dense clusters of stars that bombard the Earth with more cosmic rays, which produce more clouds and other effects in the atmosphere, which limit the amount sunlight that gets to Earth’s surface.
Cosmic ray flux can be deduced from the so-called cosmogenic nuclides, such as beryllium-10, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 as measured in ancient sediments, trees, shells, and meteorites.
A general estimate of climate is given by the types of sedimentary rocks deposited, such as limestone, siltstone, shale, sandstone, and glacial deposits. Each type of rock is deposited under certain climatic conditions. Fossils within the rocks give an even better picture.
Another method of estimating temperature is by using oxygen isotopes, a method that is claimed to estimate temperature within one degree.
Normal oxygen is O16 with six protons and six neutrons. There is also “heavy” oxygen with eight neutrons. When combined with hydrogen to produce water, each molecule has a different reaction to temperature.
The geologic reconstruction of temperature is based on oxygen-18 isotopes from fossils and cave stalagmites.
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is also estimated by rock types and especially by fossil leaves. Leaves have pores called stomates whereby the plant takes in CO2 and expels oxygen. If CO2 is abundant, the leaves have fewer and/or smaller stomates than when CO2 is scarcer.
Notice the graphic above the Carboniferous Period circa 300 million years ago. This was an age when most of Earth’s coal deposits were formed. That sucked up lots of CO2.
Notice that CO2 started to decline about 375 million years ago but the temperature decrease of the ice age started about 320 million years ago.
CO2 rose again after ice-age temperatures warmed the ocean driving some CO2 in the ocean into the atmosphere.
Besides rocks, ice cores also give us some information about climate in our current ice age:
Now let’s take a look at our current interglacial period, called the Holocene, which began about 11,000 years ago.
Here, too, we see a temperature fluctuation (recorded by lake-bed sediments and ice cores). The fluctuations are due mainly to several different solar cycles, which when combined produce a 1,500-year cycle of warming and cooling.
Notice that the magnitude of warm periods is declining with time. Does that mean we are heading for another glacial epoch?
History shows that the cool periods were usually times of famine because crops would not sufficiently grow.
Another influence on climate is the relationship of the Earth to the sun. Earth’s orbit around the sun is elliptical which varies in eccentricity. The tilt of Earth’s axis of rotation relative to its orbital plane also varies.
These are called Milankovitch Cycles and may be caused by the varying gravitational attraction of the large planets in our solar system. These cycles cause variations in sunlight reaching polar regions.
The climate also changes with the position of the continents, which control ocean currents. Submarine volcanoes must be considered when evaluating the causes of climate change.
Usually, these changes are regional, not global, however, they may have global influences such as changing precipitation patterns as seen with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).
A Note on the “Greenhouse) hypothesis:
There is much hype about so-called “greenhouse” gases. The “greenhouse” hypothesis deals with heat transfer by conduction and radiation but completely ignores heat transfer by convection (i.e. wind).
As the sun warms the Earth’s surface, heat is reradiated into the atmosphere as a broad spectrum of infrared radiation, some of which is captured by greenhouse gases and sent back to the surface.
Greenhouse gases don’t warm the surface, they slow the cooling. Without them, nighttime temperatures would drop to freezing.
The table above shows the contribution of each “greenhouse” gas. Water vapor is the principal player. CO2 from burning fossil fuels comprises only 0.1% of total “greenhouse” gases; methane represents only 0.06%.
Neither has any effect on global temperature.
Top photo by Donald Giannatti on Unsplash
Read rest at Wry Heat
Thank you Mr. Stewart. Very interesting paper you referenced.
Jonathan
Kudos Jonathan. Go to the site following. The destruction of the C02 theory.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba6853
Submarine volcanoes are irrelevant for climate change and no data exist to prove the heat releases could be measured at the ocean’s surface. The last known eruption was January 2022 and had no effect on the global average temperature.
While water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, it is a feedback to changes in troposphere temperatures, not a forcing DIRECTLY causing warming or cooling.
Convection is required for the greenhouse effect. The author says no. The author is wrong.
The greenhouse effect does warm the surface. The author is wrong again. The warming is small relative to the upwelling radiation of Earth cooling itself, so CO2’s effect is often described as impeded cooling.
The final sentence is
“Neither has any effect on global temperature”
Neither appears to mean CO2 and methane.
The sentence is false and marks the author as a climate science fool.. CO2 has a significant effect on climate. Methane does not.
.
Rocks tell us nothing about the effects of manmade CO2
I believe the author has rocks in his head on the subject of climate science. Do not take this climate buffoon author seriously
Richard, may I call you Dick? Please take a course in writing composition. You’re a scatter brain.
I found Duhamel’s post instructional in the analysis of proxy data.
Also, James Kamis presented a convincing essay on the source of El Nino, geothermal.
You are a biased science denier.
Agree. He frequently tears down scientists without telling us what his scientific background is or why we should disregard their posting. And I found the geologist’s post quite instructional. I like your last statement that Dick is a denier of science with his posts.
Insults do not refute anything I wrote
If so, why do you frequently attempt to refute contributors to this website using insults? Tourette syndrome?
Your insults do not refute any of the facts I posted.
I happen to like and recommend almost every article on this website for the daily recommended reading list I publish on a blog
This article was a rare exception
https://honestclimatescience.blogspot.com/
The volcanic eruption of January 2022 added 15% water to upper atmosphere. You have said on numerous occasions that water is a strong green house gas, and you are right. With that much water being injected there had to be an impact on earth’s temperature. That came in 2023 in what some called the warmest year ever. The fact that there was a delay has been used as a lame excuse to dismiss a natural cause for warming.
Tota; BS
The stratosphere contains about 1% of all atmospheric water vapor, so a 10% or 15% increase of the 1% is tiny
There is no delayed effect of a volcano. The strongest effect is in the next month or two. There was no observed effect on the global average temperature in January through March 2022
The warming that started in mid-2023 was from a new El Nino, not some imaginary delayed effect of a submarine volcano
1991, Mt. Pinatubo unleashed a torrent of sulfur gases into the atmosphere. A year later, 1992, my crops froze in September. That’s more than a month or two.