Supporters of a regional pact that would tackle transportation emissions are struggling to win over several New England governors concerned that the climate change initiative will increase gas prices.
After the Transportation and Climate Initiative was announced last month, New Hampshire’s Republican Gov. Chris Sununu said the state won’t join, citing fears of a gas price hike.
Vermont’s Republican Gov. Phil Scott said he couldn’t support the initiative if it amounts to a tax on carbon.
A spokesman for Maine’s Democratic Gov. Janet Mills said states like Maine have unique transportation issues and will be “appropriately cautious.”
The initiative is aimed at a dozen Northeast and mid-Atlantic states and would take effect in 2022.
It would address pollution from transportation — which represents 40% of greenhouse gas emissions in the region, the largest source of emissions. The area has tens of millions of registered vehicles.
New Jersey has not committed to implementing the initiative while a spokesman for Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said his administration was still examining it.
Virginia is also reviewing the draft memorandum.
“I am happy to see that other Governors are following my lead in rightfully sounding the alarm on this new gas tax,” Sununu said in a statement. “New Hampshire is proof that the best environmental stewardship can be achieved without massive tax schemes.”
Many of the states are already part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which covers 10 states in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic and targets emissions from the power sector.
Under the Transportation and Climate Initiative, wholesale fuel companies would be required to purchase pollution allowances at auction.
The sale of those allowances could generate billions for states to invest in carbon-reducing transportation options — like electric buses, electric car charging stations, bike lanes, and sidewalks.
The initiative could lead to emissions reductions in the region by as much as 25% by 2032. But the opposition appears to be around a potential gas price hike.
If fuel companies pass the cost of the allowances onto consumers, the price of gas in the region could climb by five cents to 17 cents per gallon in 2022, when the pact would take effect.
Among the pact’s opponents are Americans for Prosperity, the advocacy group founded by the billionaire Koch brothers.
The group’s New Hampshire chapter came out against the TCI the same day as Sununu, calling the initiative a top-down government mandate that would “punish hardworking Granite Staters.”
Supporters of the initiative said the fears over gas prices are overblown and ignore the agreement’s potential benefits.
“Personally I think this is political grandstanding,” said Timmons Roberts, a professor of environmental studies at Brown University. “This is the incremental change, it would be over 12 years. This is just using a well-meaning effort as a whipping boy.”
But Roberts and others acknowledge that the pact needs to address the concerns of low-income and working families who must drive long distances for work or school. …
The pact has been praised by many of the region’s business, health and environmental leaders, including Massachusetts Republican Gov. Charlie Baker.
He touted the pact in his State of the Commonwealth address last week as part of his plan for the state to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Read rest at KRQE
“The sale of those allowances could generate billions for states to invest in carbon-reducing transportation options — like electric buses, electric car charging stations, bike lanes, and sidewalks.”
Want to bet? These moneys will go into a slush fund that can be dipped into for any purpose a state legislator can dream up. And boy-oh-boy, do they come up with some nightmares…..
Liberals are more nutty then a warehouse full if Christmas Fruitcakes
This article appears to be saying ‘greenhouse gases’ are real and do drive the temperature up. I was under the impression that violates the laws of thermodynamics.
Since when have “journalists” been concerned about presenting the truth about anything they feel strongly about. Or anything else for that matter.
True, but it is the CCD editor’s choice what articles he publishes. I can only assume he’s seeking to show a ‘balanced’ number of articles.
Why should they risk losing jobs and raising the Utility bills of their states residents just to appease Al Gore the Bore and those idiots from Greenpeace
On top of this, all the elitist Democrats will still fly private and expend more energy to power their mansions. Let’s force these people to curb their ways before they nationalize it on the rest of us.