• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Germany’s Wind Giants Now Want Taxpayer Subsidies

by Brian Parkin and William Wilkes
February 11, 2020, 10:37 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
6

offshore wind farmThe first time Germany auctioned offshore wind projects, developers were happy to forgo any subsidies, confident the technology was robust enough to turn a profit unaided. Now, they’re not nearly so sure.

Germany’s offshore wind giants now are looking at a U.K. program that would ensure they get paid enough for their power, no matter what wholesale prices are doing.

Potential bidders in Germany’s next round of offshore auctions in 2022 including Orsted A/S and Vattenfall AB are attempting to convince Chancellor Angela Merkel to draft new auction rules to secure income from the giant machines at sea.

They are concerned the government’s muddled climate policy will make investments in the technology riskier and feel they need guarantees to invest billions of euros.

It’s a stark change from the last round of auctions in 2017 when Orsted and EnBW AG won most of Germany’s maiden offshore wind auction by forgoing the crutch of subsidies.

At the time, Merkel hailed the result as a breakthrough in clean power’s competitiveness that might set a precedent.

The government may need to offer the kinds of contracts-for-difference, or CfDs, that the U.K. has used to promote the technology.

Those agreements will lock in the price of power generated by new projects. Winners last year included SSE Plc, Equinor ASA and Innogy SE.

Investors seek an offshore payment regime “that makes economic sense — and that’s clearly the CfD system,” Volker Malmen, Orsted’s German managing director, said by email.

The government is currently evaluating its auction system for offshore wind and has taken note of industry pressure to adopt CfDs, the Economy and Energy Ministry said in an email to Bloomberg on Friday, without being more specific.

Such a system would give necessary financial security while ensuring the continued development of offshore wind to achieve climate targets, he said.

A spokesman for Vattenfall AB, which has won offshore capacity in the Netherlands with zero-bids, said the utility also backs a roll-out of the instruments.

As Merkel gears up moves to cut emissions, policy shifts are becoming more frequent, fanning uncertainty among investors, said Stefan Thimm, managing director of Germany’s BWO offshore industry lobby, which represents some of Europe’s biggest utilities.

Read more at Bloomberg

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Gee what a surprise . They need a subsidy . What a shock now that the bird blenders are erected .
    When Germany makes mistakes they go big .

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Strange the fact that two organiztion created to protect Birds now support Wind and Solar Energy that is a hazard to birds The National Audubon Society and the Royal Society for the Protecting of Birds have allowed Politics to get in the way of what they was created for

  3. pater eusebius tenebrarum says:
    6 years ago

    Of course they want subsidies. This stuff is simply not economically viable and everybody knows it.

  4. Brian James says:
    6 years ago

    Jul 31, 2019 Green Killing Machines: the impact of renewable energy on wildlife and nature

    https://youtu.be/psFkvOpSQc0

  5. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    The investors want a payment regime that makes economic sense? What about the consumer /ratepayer / taxpayer? Subsidies muddy the picture. Who pays for what becomes opaque. When I pay my Ontario Hydro bill, they tell me that I’ve received ‘support’ , last month the support was more than my payment. I pay for my ‘support’ through my taxes. Guaranteed that I’m paying for other peoples’ support ,too.
    I’m also paying for the electricity that charges subsidized EV’s, too.
    I can see our future. Energy will be treated like our single payer government health care. Subsidized, substandard, monopolized and rationed.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    So now they want subsidies for those Bird and Bat maiming Wind Turbines that ar unreliable and totaly useless? Talk about wasting tax payers money

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • MamdaniDemocrats Sell Affordability But Their Green Agenda Is Driving Up Prices
    Dec 9, 2025
    Democrats push affordability, but their green agenda is driving up energy costs and squeezing Americans nationwide. […]
  • Panic-Stricken Climate Alarmists Resort To Even Bolder Lies
    Dec 9, 2025
    Climate alarmists are panicking as their fearmongering loses power, and the public awakens to the truth. […]
  • Offshore wind farmClinton-Appointed Judge Blocks Trump’s Offshore Wind Farm Freeze
    Dec 9, 2025
    Clinton-appointed judge overturns Trump’s halt on offshore wind projects, calling the order unlawful. […]
  • plastic recyclingThree Words Environmentalists Hate: ‘Stop Recycling Plastic’
    Dec 9, 2025
    Recycling was sold as the fix, but new research shows it may be one of the biggest drivers of microplastics in our lives. […]
  • Newsom clean energy presserBlue States Backtrack On Green Agenda As Energy Costs And Reliability Bite
    Dec 8, 2025
    States are reversing aggressive green policies as energy costs, reliability, and failed climate lawsuits force a rethink. […]
  • desert sunFinancial Times Fuels Extreme Weather Panic In Arab Region, Misrepresents WMO Report
    Dec 8, 2025
    New WMO data undercut the scary claims, but Financial Times still pushed a narrative of rising Arab heat, drought, and floods. […]
  • Boulder scotusWhy SCOTUS Must Not Let Climate Lawfare Dictate U.S. Energy Policy
    Dec 8, 2025
    Boulder’s climate lawsuit gives the Supreme Court a chance to stop activists from using courts to impose national energy rules. […]
  • Petermann glacier aerial shotDefying Media Hype, Greenland’s Petermann Glacier Has Grown Over 18 Miles Since 2012
    Dec 8, 2025
    Despite media alarmism, Greenland’s Petermann Glacier has grown over 30 kilometers since 2012, with Arctic ice showing 15 years of stable trends. […]
  • dakota pipeline protestGreenpeace Asks Dutch Court To Overturn Multi-Million-Dollar American Verdict
    Dec 8, 2025
    Greenpeace is asking a Dutch court to overturn a multi-million-dollar U.S. verdict, using European law to block American court rulings. […]
  • polar bearPolar Bears Thriving As Arctic Sea Ice Expands, Data Shows
    Dec 8, 2025
    Healthy polar bears and fast-growing sea ice are reshaping the Arctic story this year, with real data showing stability instead of a death spiral. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky