• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

D.C.’s Top Lawyer Going After Energy Companies Using Activists’ Money, Lawyers

by Spencer Walrath
October 01, 2019, 2:20 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
6
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

exxon sign stationWashington D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine just announced his intention to open an investigation and “very likely” pursue litigation against several energy companies in a Frankensteinian monster of a lawsuit.

Speaking at an event hosted by the Sierra Club last week, Racine encouraged the audience to “look out for developments in the fall,” according to reporting by E&E News.

According to Racine, the investigation will not only scrutinize investor disclosures related to climate change, similar to New York’s, but will also include a “broader climate change aspect,” comparable to against multiple energy companies.

This multi-pronged approach suggests that Racine has predetermined that energy producers must be guilty of something, and he plans to hire outside attorneys to help him dig around until he figures out what exactly he wants to allege they are guilty of.

But Racine’s tactics have come under fire in recent months and have revealed a desire to avoid transparency and a willingness to welcome outside donors and undue influence into the Office of the Attorney General (OAG).

DC’s unprecedented bid for outside counsel for climate litigation

In February 2019, the OAG released a proposal soliciting outside counsel on a contingency basis “for legal services in support of OAG’s investigation and potential litigation against ExxonMobil Corporation…in connection with Exxon’s statements or omissions about the effects of its fossil fuel products on climate change.”

According to the proposal, the hired outside counsel will only receive monetary compensation for their work if they negotiate a settlement or are victorious in court.

However, the arrangement also allows for hired counsel to seek outside funding, opening the case up to a phenomenon called “litigation investment,” which allows investors to pay the upfront costs of litigation in exchange for a healthy cut of the eventual settlement or award.

Typically, this is used to help a plaintiff without means to pay their medical bills or immediate legal costs.

According to Andrew Grossman, an attorney and adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, this phenomenon was blocked by most states and bar associations until recently and is “unheard-of” for financing law enforcement action by government officials.

As Grossman explained, such an arrangement opens the case up to special interests that would benefit from the power of an attorney general’s office:

“It is unusual enough that the government is looking to hire outside attorneys to target a particular private party for law enforcement, on a contingency-fee basis. That gives a whole new meaning to ‘policing for profit.’…

“This allows a litigation investor or even a hedge fund to invest in law enforcement, and the investors stand to profit the more aggressively that the private attorneys wield the government’s power.”

In this regard, Racine stands alone as the only attorney general to allow this outside financing in connection with climate litigation.

Racine invites more special interests to the swamp

This is not the only example of Racine’s willingness to solicit outside counsel at the risk of exposing the office to special interests – especially those critical of the energy industry.

Racine’s office is coordinating with and receiving assistance from the activist group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to pursue litigation against the federal government.

CREW is funded by powerful Democratic donors like George Soros and is critical of individuals working in the oil and gas industry.

While the OAG claims their work is in relation to litigation against the federal government, the hired counsel, attorney Robert B. McKinstry is an environmental lawyer, focused on climate change.

OAG evades transparency laws in an effort to hide the relationship with Bloomberg litigation task force

The OAG has also evaded transparency around their involvement with the Michael Bloomberg-funded Environmental Impact Center at the NYU School of Law.

The Environmental Impact Center embeds seasoned environmental attorneys in Democratic AG offices to pursue litigation and other work related to climate change.

As EID has previously noted, the Competitive Enterprise Institute filed a suit against the city for failing to cooperate with open records requests regarding their relationship with the outside institution.

Conclusion

As D.C. signals that it wishes to join the climate litigation campaign, Racine’s comments last week suggest this case will serve as a Hail Mary for the powerful anti-energy interest groups, regardless of their crusade’s potential costs to taxpayers, or the integrity of the OAG offices they’ve convinced to join their ranks.

Read more at EID Climate

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Health

No, Climate Change Isn’t Behind Britain’s Mosquito Fears

May 27, 2025
Energy

‘Green’ Waste Piles Up As Solar Panels And Wind Turbines Pollute Landfills

May 27, 2025
Energy

MISO Ignored Warnings Before Holiday Blackout Left Blue City In The Dark

May 27, 2025

Comments 6

  1. ninetyninepct says:
    6 years ago

    Energy companies should show their support by stopping deliveries and sales of all petroleum products until the court case is finished. The AG might actually be awarded some sort of a settlement which the oil companies should pay in oil. Best the AG start building a few thousand massive storage tanks somewhere and scare up a bunch of customers.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    This whole thing is nothing but a total scandal were being told that America is the worlds #1 PRODUCER OF GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE if you real’y beleive all the load of Malarkey coming from the Greens

  3. TEWS_Pilot says:
    6 years ago

    Exxon should file a “John Doe” restraining order against everyone who participates in this shakedown not allowing them to step foot on any Exxon or Exxon contracted distributor of their products or buy any of their products or services anywhere. If they don’t want to use the products and services, forbid them from using them.

  4. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    If we surrendered to a hefty carbon tax, would the campaign stop? No. That money would disappear, there’d be more needs, and more after that.
    And the planet’s climate wouldn’t change one iota as a result.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    There are Vultures(Trial Lawyers)circling over Exxon/Moble they smell a big profit through Litigation and lawsuits this AG needs a new job as Janitor after all if they can make the mess then they should be made to clean it all up

  6. Russell Johnson says:
    6 years ago

    A war on energy, nothing moves or produces without crude oil and all of it’s by-products.
    This tack indicates there is no corruption too vile for lawyers……..

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • mosquitoNo, Climate Change Isn’t Behind Britain’s Mosquito Fears
    May 27, 2025
    The Guardian asserts that climate change will make the UK more hospitable to mosquito-borne diseases, ignoring established drivers. […]
  • wind turbine blades landfill‘Green’ Waste Piles Up As Solar Panels And Wind Turbines Pollute Landfills
    May 27, 2025
    Solar and wind waste is piling up with no clear plan for disposal, raising new questions about the cost of going green and the myth of net zero. […]
  • new orleans blackoutMISO Ignored Warnings Before Holiday Blackout Left Blue City In The Dark
    May 27, 2025
    Nearly 100,000 lost power in New Orleans after MISO cut the grid, raising alarm over blackout risk tied to green energy replacing coal and gas. […]
  • protest FFF world on fire‘Doomed From Birth’: How Climate Alarmism Is Stoking An Epidemic Of Youth Anxiety
    May 26, 2025
    Hollywood heirs like Ramona Sarsgaard and Violet Affleck are spiraling into climate panic—fueled by activism, media hype, and elite institutions. […]
  • Biden touting green economyGOP’s Big, Beautiful Bill Would Rescind $500 Billion In Green Energy Handouts
    May 26, 2025
    The House-passed BBB would repeal $500B in green handouts, slash subsidies, and undo key parts of the inaptly named Inflation Reduction Act. […]
  • humpback whale ny coastHow Climate Buzzwords Hijacked The Language To Hide Environmental Harm
    May 26, 2025
    Climate buzzwords like ‘carbon footprint’ and ‘green energy’ mislead the public and mask real environmental damage. […]
  • north sea oil rigTrump Urges UK To Cut Sky-High Bills With More Drilling, Less Renewables
    May 23, 2025
    Trump urged the UK to slash sky-high energy bills by expanding oil and gas drilling, embracing fracking, and ditching costly renewables and imports. […]
  • Ocean waves near pierMeteorologist Slams CNN For Stoking Debunked Fears Of A Collapsing AMOC
    May 23, 2025
    CNN pushes debunked AMOC collapse claims to fuel coastal flooding and economic panic—ignoring data, expert doubts, and real insurance cost drivers. […]
  • NY Times headline screencapNYT Decries NOAA Staffing Cuts While Ignoring Altered Temperature Records
    May 23, 2025
    NYT highlights Trump rollback of climate programs, but skips over NOAA’s temp data tampering and holes in the climate crisis narrative. […]
  • gavin newsom joe bidenSenate Strikes Down California EV Mandate In Blow To Biden’s Climate Agenda
    May 23, 2025
    Senate overturns California EV mandate, striking down one of Biden’s final climate moves in a blow to draconian green energy rules. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch