About 143 years ago, this September 30, the Hearthstone Historic House in my mother’s hometown (Appleton, Wisconsin) became the first home in the world lit by electricity. [emphasis, links added]
Today, few can imagine our lives without plentiful, reliable, affordable electricity – for lights, computers, washers, driers, dishwashers, heating, air conditioning, television, vehicles, hospitals, schools, factories, data centers, artificial intelligence, and more, to light, improve, and sustain our lives.
And yet nearly 750 million people still have no access to electricity. Billions more have minimal, sporadic access.
The vast majority live in Sub-Saharan Africa: 600 million with no electricity; hundreds of millions more with minimal or sporadic power. Many Asians and Latin Americans are similarly deprived. Often, electrification rates are high in cities but extremely low in the countryside.
Incredibly, across much of Europe, millions of poor and middle-class families are also deprived. Many simply cannot afford the electricity prices that have skyrocketed in the wake of coal, gas, and nuclear power plant closures, in favor of wind and solar installations.
Other Europeans no longer have jobs, because factories and entire industries cannot afford those prices, have closed down, and sent their jobs to China and other coal-based electricity nations.
Still others are being told by climate-obsessed pressure groups, media, and political elites to light, heat, and cool only one room, wear more sweaters, and appreciate electricity when it’s available, not gripe about its cost or absence.
Europe refuses to frack for oil and gas … but imports Russian fuels, thereby sustaining Putin’s war on Ukraine’s citizens and civilian infrastructure.
Several US states have also imposed Euro-style electricity rates, rolling or recurring blackouts, and economic disruption in the name of saving the planet from climate calamities.
Leading, applauding, and demanding this insanity are the United Nations, European Union, International Court of Justice (ICJ), multilateral anti-development banks, non-governmental organizations, and even the now-defunct USAID.
They harp about climate emergencies, demand that countries switch to “clean” energy, and refuse to approve or finance fossil fuel projects even for Africa.
The ICJ recently asserted that people have a “human right” to a “clean, healthy, sustainable environment,” which, to the court, means no impacts from fossil-fuel-driven climate change.
It said nothing about rights to reliable and affordable energy, modern healthcare, or decent living standards.
These proclamations and policies carry serious and often lethal consequences, especially for the world’s poorest people. They excuse and justify policies that effectively keep families and nations mired in poverty, squalor, joblessness, disease, and malnutrition.
The ICJ-defined right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment also ignores the reality that “clean energy” requires extensive mining and minerals processing, using fossil fuels, and resulting in extensive toxic land, air, and water pollution.

Much of this dirty work is done in the poor families’ own backyards (because the elites want no mining or processing in their fiefdoms), and much of it involves child and slave labor, no or substandard workplace safety rules, and rampant land and habitat desecration.
The subsequent wind, solar, and transmission installations impact hundreds of times more crop, habitat, and scenic lands than coal or gas power plants that generate electricity in far greater quantities, far more reliably, and far less expensively.
In India’s Thar Desert next to Pakistan, native species are being sacrificed on the climate crisis and clean energy altar.
Solar panels already blanket over 200 square miles; more than 2.5 million trees have been cut down to install them; and another 14,000 square miles of habitat (almost equal to Switzerland or half of South Carolina) could be clear-cut for more panels, Vijay Jayaraj reports.
Even ponds that once attracted pelicans and a dozen other species are covered with solar panels. Numerous other wild species are also struggling to survive as their habitats are destroyed.
Cleaning and cooling the panels already requires the equivalent of 300,000 people’s drinking water needs every week.
This destruction is happening all over the world. The ICJ still insists wind and solar power foster “clean, healthy, sustainable, climate-friendly” economies – and ignores the privation it perpetuates.
The limited, intermittent, unpredictable electricity from Climate Cabal-approved generators guarantees that the world’s still-impoverished people will never have the appliances we take for granted.
They may eventually have cell phones and laptops, a few lights, dorm-room refrigerators, and jobs maintaining “renewable” power systems.
However, they will never enjoy the modern healthcare, homes, and living standards that require 24/7/365 coal, gas, nuclear, or hydroelectric power.
So before we let the Climate-Industrial Complex inflict its lies, ideologies, and policies on people who’ve never had an opportunity to enjoy – much less reject – the marvels of modern civilization, let’s ask those folks if they’re okay with that version of a “clean, sustainable” future by giving up their aspirations for the lives and wonders they see in movies and magazines.

Let’s find out whether they’ve had a chance to speak with their European counterparts, and inquire about how Europe’s automotive, glass, pharmaceutical, and other industries are faring.
How many workers still have jobs? How many companies have moved their operations to China, India, or other faraway locales? How much do they enjoy living under the costs and restrictions imposed by EU politicians and bureaucrats?
Eastern Europeans weren’t overjoyed to exchange six years under the Nazis for 50 years under the benevolent people’s republics of the Soviet Union.
Poor families in Africa, Asia, and Latin America may not be equally excited about the prospect of swapping their current daily grinds for the minimally better lives envisioned for them by would-be global ruling elites.
Perhaps they will no longer have to live in mud-and-thatch huts, carry water from distant wells, cook over wood and dung fires that infect women and their babies with lung diseases, drink parasite-infected water and eat spoiled food, suffer from malaria and other insect-borne diseases, be treated in antiquated hospitals that don’t even have window screens, and die decades before they should.
But how much better will their lives be under policies imposed by elites who decide their fates after flying private jets from one of their mansions to the next 5-star UN-sanctioned climate or economic conference?
The world’s poor don’t just have a human right to truly clean, healthy, sustainable environments.
They have a right to enjoy the benefits of affordable 24/7 electricity, well-paid jobs, and all the modern appliances, healthcare, homes, prosperity, and 6,000+ products made from petrochemicals that most people in industrialized nations already enjoy.
And to do so without being guilted and conned by phony claims that aspiring to such energy and lives will bring worsening storms and inundations from rising seas, more forest fires, stressed blood supplies, and other catastrophes conjured up by climate grifters and their political, academic, and media allies.
Poor and developing nations need to band together, finance their own energy infrastructure, development, health, and prosperity – and tell the carbon colonialists to take a hike.
Top photo by Yahaya Ahmed via Pexels
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power – Black Death, and other books and articles on energy, climate change, economic development, and human rights.
The hysterical, hyperbolic author does not realize that undeveloped nations are not pursuing net zero policies.
No one is forcing these nations to go green.
If a developed nation offered them free money to build a solar or wind farm, they might do it.
But about 175 nations out of 195 merely talk about net zero.
They’re only virtue signaling.
The author has a wild imagination.
Trillions of dollars have been spent around the world rolling out wind and solar infrastructure and we have got in return more expensive and less reliable power with serious environmental impacts.
The elephant in the room is the impact of severe wind droughts or dunkelflautes over continental areas, causing gaps in the contribution of windpower to the grid, that Paul Miskelly and Anton Lang documented in Australia over a decade ago.
https://rafechampion.substack.com/p/the-late-discovery-of-wind-droughts
Dirt farmers are alert to the threat of rain droughts, but the wind farmers never checked the reliability of the wind supply.
https://rafechampion.substack.com/p/we-have-to-talk-about-wind-droughts
Back to the point of the post, Lomborg has shown how a fraction of those trillions spent in the ways that he described -public health and education for example, would yield massive human returns and no doubt the same would apply to energy projects using the ample resources of coal and gas in many Third World countries.
In Trump’s first term he was pushing the big international finance organizations to fund sensible energy projects.
I think it was the president of World Bank at the UN Confab who said that loans would again be considered for coal plants in sub-Saharan Africa. That’s a big shift in the right direction if they actually follow through with this.
Thanks Steve. The Obama administration resisted sensible funding.