• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

California’s Clean Energy Math Doesn’t Work Without Nuclear

Does the Golden State want to be part of the nuclear renaissance?

by Kerry Jackson
January 09, 2026, 8:20 AM
in Energy, Money & Finance, News and Opinion, Politics
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
2

diablo canyon nuclear plant
As the California Coastal Commission agreed this month to keep the state’s last nuclear energy plant open for at least five more years, the Trump administration announced federal funding for the development of small modular nuclear reactors. [some emphasis, links added]

The Diablo Canyon Power Plant in San Luis Obispo, the only remaining nuclear energy facility in the state, was saved this month from imminent death when the Coastal Commission voted to issue the permit the plant needs to obtain a federal license to operate for another 20 years.

The twin-reactor site has been providing safe, clean, and reliable electrical power for four decades.

Nationally, the Tennessee Valley Authority and Holtec Government Services in Michigan were chosen to develop light-water small modular reactor projects. Each will receive up to $400 million in federal cost-shared funding.

Champions of limited government will dispute the federal government’s involvement rather than allowing the market to make that choice.

They should. It’s a legitimate gripe.

However, $800 million is a small amount of private capital to be invested in nuclear power once public policy clears the way for the marketplace.

The government has picked nuclear energy to be a loser for decades, suppressing its growth with regulatory and licensing hurdles, and even state-level bans on new plant construction (including California’s almost half-century-old [de facto] moratorium).

The number of domestic nuclear reactors peaked at 112, but now there are only about 90, says the Energy Information Administration, and 23 are decommissioning as of August.

Maybe it’s time to make up for the penalties imposed without justification on nuclear power?

California has been at the forefront of banning nuclear power, but some lawmakers have been considering rolling back the ban so the state can meet its clean energy goals.

A bill was introduced earlier this year to exempt small modular reactors – the same technology that the administration is betting on – from the nuclear ban.

A system powered solely by solar, wind, and hydro isn’t an engineering strategy; it’s a belief system.

Nuclear-friendly bills proposed in 2022 and 2024 also intended to accelerate the development of small modular reactors.

That none of the three has become law is discouraging, since the state needs to avail itself of nuclear options if it’s to meet its green energy targets and avoid weekly rolling blackouts, Leonard Rodberg recently wrote in CalMatters.

“A system powered solely by solar, wind, and hydro isn’t an engineering strategy; it’s a belief system. Zealotry and energy reliability don’t mix,” says Rodberg, a Queens College urban studies professor emeritus.

Even in 2050, five years after California is to have achieved “carbon neutrality” in power generation, Rodberg says there will still be “extended periods throughout the year when the renewables” will fail to meet the load demand.

“In fact, there are 52 days during the year when significant amounts of gas have to be burned to avoid system failure.”

If natural gas is banned, then nuclear will have to make up the shortage. It can take 10 to 12 years to add new nuclear capacity, from the planning and licensing phase to completion of construction.

We should add a few years, with this being California, where all construction projects become slogs. It is unachievable to build a 90% clean power grid by 2035, replacing fossil fuel generation with nuclear.

Read rest at Issues & Insights

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 2

  1. Davd Lewis says:
    3 weeks ago

    I once read an article that concluded if California had put as much money into nuclear power as they have wind and solar, the state would have energy independence. That is also true of Germany. Nuclear power runs 24/7 with no carbon dioxide emission. There is slight down time for maintenance.

    Reply
  2. Steve Bunten says:
    3 weeks ago

    Every state in the US that has declared they will not be using fossil fuels to generate electricity need nuclear power. That’s the only way to achieve this ridiculous goal. And yet many of these blue states have shut down fully functional nuclear plants because the same groups who want to close coal plants also hate nukes. This also happened in Germany but because the Germans don’t have natural gas in the way we have in the US they had to restart coal plants instead of restarting their nuclear plants.

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • highway 1 collapseClimate Change Isn’t Breaking Highway 1 — Nature And Bad Siting Are
    Feb 2, 2026
    Highway 1 damage reflects natural erosion and poor siting, not worsening storms or climate change, despite LA Times claims. […]
  • calif gas stationDespite Highest Pump Prices, California Lawmakers Float Mileage Tax
    Feb 2, 2026
    With pump prices among the nation’s highest, California lawmakers are considering a mileage-based tax to replace declining gas-tax revenue. […]
  • african kids playingThe Climate Agenda Is Collapsing—Will The Global Poor Finally Be Heard?
    Feb 2, 2026
    The global climate agenda is cracking as poor nations reject Europe and the UN’s energy policies in favor of growth, power, and survival. […]
  • an inconvenient truthThe Climate Movie That Aged Badly
    Feb 2, 2026
    Twenty years on, Al Gore’s famous climate documentary has flopped spectacularly against real-world outcomes or its own predictions. […]
  • climate training judges‘Shockingly Inappropriate’: Legal Experts Slam Judges’ Guide Over Climate Bias Claims
    Jan 30, 2026
    Legal experts say a key judges’ reference manual strays from neutral education, raising concerns about bias in cases involving environmental lawsuits. […]
  • Eco Outlet Blames Argentina’s Bad Cherry Season On Climate Change – It’s Not
    Jan 30, 2026
    A single bad cherry season doesn’t equal climate change, and long-term data show Argentina’s production has grown. […]
  • africa poverty poorWhy Climate Panic Is A Distraction From True Environmental Threats
    Jan 30, 2026
    While elites fixate on carbon, developing nations face a far deadlier crisis of pollution, toxic waste, and poisoned drinking water. […]
  • polar bearsStudy Finds Barents Sea Polar Bears Thriving Despite Arctic Sea Ice Loss
    Jan 30, 2026
    A new study finds Barents Sea polar bears were fatter and healthier after 1995, even as the region experienced dramatic sea ice loss in the 2000s. […]
  • antique desk globeThe ‘Godfather’ Of Climate Science Built His Theory On An Imaginary World
    Jan 30, 2026
    Modern climate science traces back to an imagined model built on assumptions, not real-world observations. […]
  • Madison wind demolitionDemolition Of New York Wind Farm Exposes Waste, Taxpayer Abuse
    Jan 30, 2026
    A once-touted wind project was torn down after just 25 years, despite millions in subsidies, tax credits, and guaranteed grid access. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky