Given the state of affairs in Ukraine and the Middle East and the rise of China as a chief U.S. adversary, one would assume that the Department of Defense (DoD) has its hands full combating real threats to U.S. national security. [emphasis, links added]
One would also think that under the fraught geopolitics of the current world, the DoD would be harnessing its precious resources toward identifying future menaces that literally pose an existential threat to the security of the United States.
Climate change does not constitute a current threat to U.S. national security, but the DoD leaders think otherwise.
In fact, the DoD believes that the climate crisis is a “national security priority.”
On December 11, the DoD announced it is very concerned with climate change in Africa because “climate-stressed areas are a recruiting opportunity for terrorist groups.”
Accordingly, the DoD declared,
“The consequences of inaction on climate will be severe, and our allies and partners will face growing security challenges as a result.”
Tragically, this is only the latest example of the DoD being sidetracked into fighting climate change.
More concerningly, this is part of a much larger effort to reorient the military’s primary focus from preventing real-world threats to abating the nonexistent threat of climate change.
In September of 2021, the DoD released its Climate Adaption Plan, which states,
“The Department of Defense (DOD) has identified climate change as a critical national security issue and threat multiplier and top management challenge… [and] must take bold steps to accelerate adaptation to reduce the adverse impacts of climate change.” As expected, the 32-page plan outlines in intricate detail how the DoD must “integrate climate change adaptation and climate resilience across agency programs, management of real property, public lands and waters, and financial services.”
One month later, the DoD released its Climate Risk Analysis, which explained that:
“Climate change is reshaping the geostrategic, operational, and tactical environments with significant implications for U.S. national security and defense. Increasing temperatures; changing precipitation patterns; and more frequent, intense, and unpredictable extreme weather conditions caused by climate change are exacerbating existing risks and creating new security challenges for U.S. interests.”
Soon after, the DoD announced that the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Air Force had all created “Action Plans” to mitigate the so-called climate crisis.
Here is a brief snippet from the Navy’s Action Plan:
“The Department must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and draw greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere, stabilize ecosystems, and achieve, as an enterprise, the nation’s commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050.”
In case you’re wondering, the other two branches of the military have also pledged to be “net zero” by 2050 under their Action Plans.
Of course, the DoD’s pivot to fighting climate change rather than ensuring that U.S. national security is its ultimate priority comes courtesy of the Biden administration.
As Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin wrote:
“On January 27, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, making it administration policy that climate considerations will be an essential element of U.S. foreign policy and national security.”
Fortunately, the Biden administration will be gone soon. Unlike Biden, President-elect Donald Trump understands that the attention of the U.S. military should be laser-focused on protecting the nation from viable threats instead of reducing its carbon footprint.
In 2017, Trump eliminated the term “climate change” from the list of worldwide threats in his National Security Strategy. Rather, Trump made it clear that his administration would focus on Russia, China, and other nation-states that pose a critical danger to U.S. interests.
Moreover, Trump pointed the finger at previous presidents who put “American energy under lock and key” while articulating that he “embraces a future of American energy dominance and self-sufficiency.”
During Trump’s first term, American energy dominance was achieved as the United States became a net oil exporter for the first time in 75 years.
Unfortunately, much of this progress was undone by Biden, who “mobilized a whole-of-government effort” to fight climate change.
However, what Biden undid Trump can redo.
When Trump returns to the Oval Office on January 20, 2025, he will do everything in his power to ensure that the U.S. military is solely focused on protecting U.S. national security.
He will also unleash the American energy sector like he did during his first term, which will further cement U.S. hegemony.
The days of the DoD being preoccupied with fighting the weather are over. Going forward, the United States and the world writ large will be safer.
Read more at American Thinker
Prior to WW2 the US had a “War Department”. Afterwards, a “Department of Defence”. Hasn’t “won” a war since.
At the outbreak of WW2 in Europe FDR engaged in “Lend-Lease” with Great Britain. Manufacturing of war materials in the US ramped up. By the time the US was actively engaged it was in reasonably good shape with factories already producing weapons.
(Nobody “wins” a war, everyone loses, men and materials. A strong military deters possible aggressors.)