• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden’s ’30 x 30′ Land Grab Is A Gift To The Climate Crazies

by Alexander Scipio
August 26, 2021, 10:26 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
3
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

save planet protestWe keep writing about the absurdity of feeling anxious, worried, or scared by the factually unsupported Anthropogenic Global Warming (“AGW;” aka “Climate Change”) hoax. This is true, but for many, it’s a yawn.

Who is to be believed these days? Just more lines in a never-ending stream of can-you-believe-this-stuff? Will it get 3.2 degrees Centigrade warmer 50 years after we’re all dead? Yawn. Will our oppression by our betters really make that big a difference today? Yawn. Will AOC & the Klimate Kult™ ever stop talking? Zzzzzzz…

It’s time to wake up.

In a previous piece, I noted that whoever is running Joe Biden (just think of that; we are the most powerful military and economic power in the world and no one knows who is in charge; complete non-accountability. That we accept this is both absurd and amazing) anyway – that whoever is calling the shots has issued an Executive Order over Joe’s name to confiscate 30 percent of America’s land and waters by 2030 (“30 for 30” is the catch-phrase).

He is doing this to help resolve the Klimate Krisis. Which doesn’t exist.

Thirty percent. Of America’s landmass. This is a big number – and a bigger deal. Without any constitutional authority, whoever is making the decisions for The Big Guy wants to steal from your children and mine 30 percent of three-and-a-half-million square miles.

That’s a million square miles for Uncle Sam.

The federal government has no authority to grab land  – the expectation of the Founders was that the federal government would own no land and would give (or sell) back to the States land not incorporated into a State for the purpose of new States or larger States.

The federal government’s authority to dispose was unlimited (except for trust standards), but its authority to acquire, retain, and manage was not: all the latter functions could be exercised only to serve enumerated powers.

Stealing a million square miles via an executive order from a demented president and to serve no enumerated power? Seriously? Are you awake yet? How much is a million square miles?

  • It’s almost twice the size of Alaska. It’s more than any European country other than Russia. It’s five times the size of France.
  • It’s all of the States created from the Louisiana Purchase plus the States of CA and NE. Or – starting from the smaller states, it’s all of the Louisiana Purchase plus the states of KY, VA, IN, ME, SC, MD, VT, NH, MA, NJ, HI, VT, DE.
  • It’s all of the land acquired from defeating Mexico in that war plus the states of MT, OR, ID, KS, MN, SD. Or – starting from the smaller States, it’s all of the Mexican acquisitions plus NC, NY, MS, PA, LA, TN, OH, KY, VA, IN, ME, SC, WV, VT, NH, MA, NJ, HI, CT, DE, RI.

How about now? Awake?

“Conservationists” say we need to return these grasslands (let’s assume they confiscate the Midwest) to their “native condition.” That we need to remove all the cows cuz cow farts are killing us and cows are destroying our grasslands. How much do you think a steak or a burger will cost then? (“Let them eat soy!”)

Years ago I rode out on a multiday wild horse (photographic) hunt in western Nevada run by UC Davis (an ag school) as an extension course. A professor of grass (the kind cows eat, not the kind Democrats smoke) was the instructor.

He told of a consulting gig for the Nature Conservancy to find out why the grasslands they had liberated from a rancher were not looking good – they were thick and woody, looking nothing like the grasslands they had expected once the Conservancy removed the non-native Herefords, Angus, etc.

The differences on two sides of a fence – a foot away from each other – were plain: on the side with grazing cows the grass looked like grass. On the “conserved” side it looked like small, woody, unhealthy bushes.

Well… if you recall your history, the Western Plains had two bison herds of millions of animals each that never stopped eating and moving. They grazed the grass and moved on.

The grass evolved with these ruminants. Take away the grazer and the grass no longer is in the environment in which it had evolved. And so changes.

The idea that confiscating a million square miles will make the country look like a Disney movie is just plain ignorant. But it’s the Left, so that’s to be expected.

The Left already has told us what they will do with these confiscated lands. They’ll ban grazing permits, probably ban hunting, and bus or fly in tens of thousands of illegal immigrants into the towns and cities of these lands to ensure they are changed from Red to Blue. (You don’t think they’ll confiscate any blue states, do you?)

They will completely alter the culture of the core of our country. And the political results. Intentionally. Illegally. Unconstitutionally.

Biden already has said he will restart Obama’s AFFH usurpation of local zoning laws, requiring cities to build multi-family housing in the suburbs, to mandate bus lines, to build in the suburbs everything everyone moved to the suburbs to get away from.

Because socialism, disguised as “equity.” Where do you think he will start, if not on the “green fields” of newly stolen land?

Will they confiscate the water resources, as well? Does the water flow across and under the land? Will the number of farms decline? What will this to do our food supply? Famine always follows socialism.

Will the people of these confiscated lands move? Do you think they’ll have a choice? Where do you think they will house these thousands of illegals? Will we have a “Right of Return”?

To the best of my knowledge, one governor has gone public with a reaction: the governor of Nebraska. Gov. Pete Ricketts has noted this proposed confiscation covers an area nine times the size of his state, and that it will devastate families and small farms.

While this is true, confiscating our country from our citizens seems to me a tad more important than one industry, and more than a few Americans don’t have at the top of their to-do list (unfortunately) preservation of farms – they get their food from the supermarket and seem not to know that food is grown and raised, harvested, slaughtered, and packaged before it gets to the supermarket.

Yes, we need our farms, but we need everything else in this one-million-square miles, as well: families, communities, American culture: America.

That more governors aren’t reacting to a proposed unconstitutional federal land grab is, frankly, embarrassing. It’s almost as though governors don’t or refuse to grasp that the states are the senior partners in our government.

Governors need to step up to this unknown person or cabal running the Executive Branch and trying to steal from us one-third of our own country. And say “Nope.” Loud, early, and often.

Read more at The Pipeline

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Judge Dismisses Bucks County Climate Lawsuit Against Big Oil

May 19, 2025
Energy

New Lawsuit Targets Empire Wind Offshore Project Over Marine Mammal Harm

May 19, 2025
Extreme Weather

Meteorologist: No, We’re Not Going Extinct — Slate’s Climate Panic Ignores Reality

May 19, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Boxorox says:
    4 years ago

    I sense this write-up is mainly an anti-government rant, to be honest. A great deal of the U.S. landmass is already government-owned. Consider military bases, national parks and federal highway easements and it’s easy to see that nothing is really amiss here.

    A google search for “How much U.S. property is owned by the federal government reveals:
    “The federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four major federal land management agencies administer 606.5 million acres of this land (as of September 30, 2018).”
    which I have no reason to argue against.

    If were are going to form and hold an alliance to fight the nit-wittery that is the climate scare, let us please stay on topic. Otherwise, gripes like this on this forum just make us look like a band of complainers.

  2. Randy M Verret says:
    4 years ago

    First of all, you can’t call it “30 x 30.” The updated name for this purported “conservation” plan is “America the Beautiful.” Based on what I’ve seen, I don’t think the federal government is orchestrating a “land grab,” per se. GOOD LUCK trying to confiscate private property without just compensation & due process. LEGAL battles are the LEAST of the government’s concerns. Armed conflict and exercise of 2nd amendment rights and State “push back” under the 10th amendment will prove formidable. The Feds are well advised to “tread lightly” when it comes to fundamental property rights in pursuit of the environmental lunacy…

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Biden’s many Crimes against the American People but as always the M.S.Media wil always cover up for him the same way they covered up for Clinton(Bill)and Obama

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • gavel moneyJudge Dismisses Bucks County Climate Lawsuit Against Big Oil
    May 19, 2025
    The court joined a 'growing chorus' of state and federal courts in ruling Bucks County’s climate claims are not justiciable. […]
  • offshore wind farm stormy seasNew Lawsuit Targets Empire Wind Offshore Project Over Marine Mammal Harm
    May 19, 2025
    Numerous groups are suing Empire Wind's offshore wind project over marine mammal harms and legal violations in New Jersey and New York coastal waters. […]
  • graveyard tombstonesMeteorologist: No, We’re Not Going Extinct — Slate’s Climate Panic Ignores Reality
    May 19, 2025
    Slate’s extinction fantasy ignores real data on human resilience, tech progress, and why warming isn’t the catastrophe alarmists claim it is. […]
  • Miliband swooning over windMiliband’s Net Zero Plan Sparks Backlash Over Jobs, Security, And China Ties
    May 19, 2025
    Ed Miliband’s radical net zero push risks jobs, energy security, and sovereignty as critics warn of grid failures and overreliance on China and Russia. […]
  • Cofrentes nuclear power plant spainSpain Quietly Boosts Nuclear And Gas After Blackout It Still Won’t Explain
    May 19, 2025
    Spain’s grid failure started in Andalusia, but officials still won’t say why—despite leaning more on nuclear and gas after the blackout. […]
  • city summer sunClimatologist Rebuts ‘Hottest Year Ever’ Claims: ‘Not Even Close’
    May 16, 2025
    Media headlines say it's the hottest year ever—but the real climate story gets buried under data tricks, historical erasure, and narrative control. […]
  • Antarctica sea lionsAntarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions
    May 16, 2025
    New data shows Antarctic ice is growing and Arctic sea ice has stabilized—raising serious questions about climate models and mainstream climate claims. […]
  • power lines electricityPennsylvania Supreme Court Presses Officials On RGGI Carbon Tax
    May 16, 2025
    Pennsylvania's high court grilled state officials about whether the money it wants to collect from the RGGI pact constitutes a fee or a tax. […]
  • german wind farmGerman Wind Slump Triggers Energy Losses, Industry Turmoil
    May 15, 2025
    Germany's wind power output plunged in 2025 as wind speeds hit a 50-year low, slashing profits and sparking doubts about energy reliability. […]
  • Geothermal PlantGeothermal Gold Rush: U.S. Digs Deep To Power the Future
    May 15, 2025
    America is racing to unlock geothermal energy using shale-era tech — and it could power AI, homes, and industry while cutting reliance on China. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch